Current strategy of non-model-based bioprocess optimizations with genetic algorithms in bioscience - A systematic review

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110247
Robert Surma , Danuta Wojcieszyńska , Sikandar I. Mulla , Urszula Guzik
{"title":"Current strategy of non-model-based bioprocess optimizations with genetic algorithms in bioscience - A systematic review","authors":"Robert Surma ,&nbsp;Danuta Wojcieszyńska ,&nbsp;Sikandar I. Mulla ,&nbsp;Urszula Guzik","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes genetic algorithms (GAs), a widely used group of nature-inspired metaheuristics, and presents examples of their application in model-free optimization of bioprocesses. This approach is mainly used to solve optimization problems expressed through mathematical models. However, there are many situations in which laboratory optimization with GAs can be performed. In many cases, GAs have been reported to be superior to other popular optimization methods. Hence, their use is particularly recommended when multiple variables need to be studied simultaneously, the search space is large, and/or little is known about the interactions between individual factors. Despite their usefulness and simplicity, the number of reported experimental examples of non-model-based optimization using GAs remains limited. Real-world experimental evaluations, as opposed to mathematical fitness functions, are neither classified nor explicitly defined in the literature. The authors propose the term “Reality-Based Genetic Algorithms” and express hope for its widespread adoption. There is a significant need for both theoretical and empirical research on the parameter configurations of genetic algorithms for experimental optimization, and the authors anticipate that this gap will be addressed in the future. In the meantime, it is recommended to either use configurations that have been proven successful in similar studies or to experiment with different configurations to generate comparative data for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 110247"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525005980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes genetic algorithms (GAs), a widely used group of nature-inspired metaheuristics, and presents examples of their application in model-free optimization of bioprocesses. This approach is mainly used to solve optimization problems expressed through mathematical models. However, there are many situations in which laboratory optimization with GAs can be performed. In many cases, GAs have been reported to be superior to other popular optimization methods. Hence, their use is particularly recommended when multiple variables need to be studied simultaneously, the search space is large, and/or little is known about the interactions between individual factors. Despite their usefulness and simplicity, the number of reported experimental examples of non-model-based optimization using GAs remains limited. Real-world experimental evaluations, as opposed to mathematical fitness functions, are neither classified nor explicitly defined in the literature. The authors propose the term “Reality-Based Genetic Algorithms” and express hope for its widespread adoption. There is a significant need for both theoretical and empirical research on the parameter configurations of genetic algorithms for experimental optimization, and the authors anticipate that this gap will be addressed in the future. In the meantime, it is recommended to either use configurations that have been proven successful in similar studies or to experiment with different configurations to generate comparative data for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物科学中遗传算法非基于模型的生物过程优化的当前策略-系统综述
本文介绍了遗传算法(GAs),一组广泛使用的自然启发的元启发式,并介绍了它们在生物过程无模型优化中的应用实例。该方法主要用于解决通过数学模型表达的优化问题。然而,在许多情况下,可以使用GAs进行实验室优化。在许多情况下,据报道,ga优于其他流行的优化方法。因此,当需要同时研究多个变量,搜索空间很大,并且/或对单个因素之间的相互作用知之甚少时,特别建议使用它们。尽管它们有用且简单,但使用GAs进行非基于模型的优化的实验示例的数量仍然有限。与数学适应度函数相反,现实世界的实验评估在文献中既没有分类也没有明确定义。作者提出了“基于现实的遗传算法”一词,并表达了对其广泛采用的希望。在实验优化中,遗传算法参数配置的理论和实证研究都有很大的需求,作者预计这一空白将在未来得到解决。同时,建议使用在类似研究中已经被证明成功的配置,或者用不同的配置进行实验,为未来的研究产生比较数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting-based biomedical time-series data synthesis for open data and robust AI Precise oxygen therapy to emphysema patients by fuzzy-based gain tuning control of set-point regulated MRAC MIPHEI-ViT: Multiplex immunofluorescence prediction from H&E images using ViT foundation models Deep learning with limited data: a transfer learning approach for transcriptomic survival prediction Noninvasive heart rate estimation using semantic segmentation and parameter optimization on 4K UAV videos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1