Pedagogical analysis of construction workshops in architecture programs to teach structure and construction

Laurens Luyten, Ivo Vrouwe, Öykü Acican
{"title":"Pedagogical analysis of construction workshops in architecture programs to teach structure and construction","authors":"Laurens Luyten,&nbsp;Ivo Vrouwe,&nbsp;Öykü Acican","doi":"10.1007/s44150-025-00146-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Construction workshops, in which architecture students create physical artefacts, have long been an important part of the architectural curriculum. One well-known type is the design-build workshop, where students participate from conceptual design to real building construction. Still, other types exist, such as model-building workshops to create and test structural systems. While construction workshops are essential in the architectural education of structures and construction, knowledge gaps remain regarding (1) the learning goals they provide, (2) the main characteristics of their learning environment, (3) the evaluation of the student learning, and (4) the interrelation of these factors. </p><p>This study conducts a pedagogical analysis of construction workshops using a mixed qualitative research method and triangulating data collected from a substantial literature review and interviews with 11 experienced workshop tutors across Europe. The top-down coding of the data was guided by the extensive workshop experience of the authors and theories of constructive alignment, project-based learning, experiential learning, game-based learning, and collaborative learning, with learning goals divided into skills, knowledge, attitudes, and values. </p><p>The findings map a wide range of learning goals that construction workshops can provide and identify the main characteristics of the learning environment. Additionally, this paper presents various factors that motivate student engagement and learning, as well as an analysis of the learning evaluation. </p><p>This research aims to enhance the understanding of the educational qualities and design of construction workshops, and calls for further studies on the impact of learning environments on learning outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00146-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction workshops, in which architecture students create physical artefacts, have long been an important part of the architectural curriculum. One well-known type is the design-build workshop, where students participate from conceptual design to real building construction. Still, other types exist, such as model-building workshops to create and test structural systems. While construction workshops are essential in the architectural education of structures and construction, knowledge gaps remain regarding (1) the learning goals they provide, (2) the main characteristics of their learning environment, (3) the evaluation of the student learning, and (4) the interrelation of these factors.

This study conducts a pedagogical analysis of construction workshops using a mixed qualitative research method and triangulating data collected from a substantial literature review and interviews with 11 experienced workshop tutors across Europe. The top-down coding of the data was guided by the extensive workshop experience of the authors and theories of constructive alignment, project-based learning, experiential learning, game-based learning, and collaborative learning, with learning goals divided into skills, knowledge, attitudes, and values.

The findings map a wide range of learning goals that construction workshops can provide and identify the main characteristics of the learning environment. Additionally, this paper presents various factors that motivate student engagement and learning, as well as an analysis of the learning evaluation.

This research aims to enhance the understanding of the educational qualities and design of construction workshops, and calls for further studies on the impact of learning environments on learning outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对建筑学课程中的建筑讲习班进行教学分析,以传授结构和建筑知识
建筑工作室,在那里建筑学生创造实物文物,一直是建筑课程的重要组成部分。一种著名的类型是设计-建造工作坊,学生参与从概念设计到真正的建筑施工。当然,也存在其他类型,比如创建和测试结构系统的模型构建车间。虽然建筑工作坊在结构和建筑的建筑教育中是必不可少的,但知识差距仍然存在于(1)他们提供的学习目标,(2)他们的学习环境的主要特征,(3)学生学习的评估,以及(4)这些因素的相互关系。本研究使用混合定性研究方法和三角测量数据对建筑工作坊进行教学分析,这些数据收集自大量文献综述和对欧洲11位经验丰富的工作坊导师的访谈。数据的自顶向下编码是由作者广泛的研讨会经验和建设性对齐、基于项目的学习、体验式学习、基于游戏的学习和协作学习理论指导的,学习目标分为技能、知识、态度和价值观。研究结果描绘了建筑工作坊可以提供的广泛的学习目标,并确定了学习环境的主要特征。此外,本文还提出了激发学生参与和学习的各种因素,并对学习评价进行了分析。本研究旨在增进对建筑工作坊教育品质与设计的了解,并呼吁进一步研究学习环境对学习成果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Scale evaluation and predictive modeling of volcanic Ash–Silica fume aggregate concrete for sustainable construction Evaluation of shared understanding in multidisciplinary architecture, engineering and construction design teams Mardin rural architectural research: Kızıltepe Beşdeğirmen (Amrude) Village Applying a values-led approach to modern architectural heritage conservation in Dhaka: insights from stakeholders’ participation Functional distribution in tall timber buildings: Global case insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1