A Qualitative Study Exploring Adolescent and Caregiver Perspectives of Emergency Department Response After a Positive Suicide Screen

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Annals of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.019
Rachel Cafferty MD , Anastasia Klott MD , Ashley Dafoe MA , Chloe Glaros MPH, MSW , Brooke Dorsey PhD, MA , Maya Haasz MD , Bruno J. Anthony PhD , Sean T. O’Leary MD, MPH
{"title":"A Qualitative Study Exploring Adolescent and Caregiver Perspectives of Emergency Department Response After a Positive Suicide Screen","authors":"Rachel Cafferty MD ,&nbsp;Anastasia Klott MD ,&nbsp;Ashley Dafoe MA ,&nbsp;Chloe Glaros MPH, MSW ,&nbsp;Brooke Dorsey PhD, MA ,&nbsp;Maya Haasz MD ,&nbsp;Bruno J. Anthony PhD ,&nbsp;Sean T. O’Leary MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.03.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>As a safety net for adolescents, the emergency department (ED) is considered an opportune setting for suicide screening and response (ie, safety assessments, brief interventions, and referrals). This study explored adolescent and caregiver perspectives on the ED’s response when nonacute suicide risk was identified during universal screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a qualitative study of adolescents who completed the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) in the ED and/or their caregiver. Our institution performs universal suicide screening with the ASQ for all ED patients aged 10 or more years. We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents (13 to 17 years) who had a “nonacute positive” ASQ (defined as “yes” to questions 1 to 4 on the ASQ without current thoughts of suicide), and/or their caregiver. Interviews were scheduled after ED discharge and occurred from October 2023 to June 2024. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded in ATLAS.ti. Content analysis was used to identify salient themes. The analytic team diagrammed each participant’s story to augment the analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We completed 17 interviews (8 adolescents and 9 caregivers). Three primary themes were identified: (1) responses by ED clinicians are lacking, confusing, and inconsistent; (2) ED responses should be tailored, well timed, private, and autonomous; and (3) resources provided by the ED should empower adolescents and caregivers moving forward. Participants recommended resources that overcome barriers to care and standardized ED interventions to better support patients and families.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, the ED response to nonacute suicide risk was described as inadequate. Participants recommended additional resources to safely manage suicidal thoughts and navigate mental health treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8236,"journal":{"name":"Annals of emergency medicine","volume":"86 4","pages":"Pages 391-401"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064425001477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

As a safety net for adolescents, the emergency department (ED) is considered an opportune setting for suicide screening and response (ie, safety assessments, brief interventions, and referrals). This study explored adolescent and caregiver perspectives on the ED’s response when nonacute suicide risk was identified during universal screening.

Methods

This was a qualitative study of adolescents who completed the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) in the ED and/or their caregiver. Our institution performs universal suicide screening with the ASQ for all ED patients aged 10 or more years. We conducted semistructured interviews with adolescents (13 to 17 years) who had a “nonacute positive” ASQ (defined as “yes” to questions 1 to 4 on the ASQ without current thoughts of suicide), and/or their caregiver. Interviews were scheduled after ED discharge and occurred from October 2023 to June 2024. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded in ATLAS.ti. Content analysis was used to identify salient themes. The analytic team diagrammed each participant’s story to augment the analysis.

Results

We completed 17 interviews (8 adolescents and 9 caregivers). Three primary themes were identified: (1) responses by ED clinicians are lacking, confusing, and inconsistent; (2) ED responses should be tailored, well timed, private, and autonomous; and (3) resources provided by the ED should empower adolescents and caregivers moving forward. Participants recommended resources that overcome barriers to care and standardized ED interventions to better support patients and families.

Conclusion

In this study, the ED response to nonacute suicide risk was described as inadequate. Participants recommended additional resources to safely manage suicidal thoughts and navigate mental health treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项质性研究,探讨青少年和照顾者对自杀筛检阳性后急诊科反应的看法。
研究目的:作为青少年的安全网,急诊科(ED)被认为是进行自杀筛查和应对(即安全评估、简短干预和转诊)的合适场所。本研究探讨了青少年和护理人员在普遍筛查中发现非急性自杀风险时,急诊科的反应。方法本研究对在急诊科和/或其照顾者完成自杀筛查问题(ASQ)的青少年进行定性研究。我们的机构对所有10岁或以上的ED患者进行普遍的自杀筛查。我们对患有“非急性阳性”ASQ的青少年(13至17岁)进行了半结构化访谈(定义为对ASQ的第1至4题回答“是”,目前没有自杀念头)和/或他们的照顾者。访谈安排在急诊室出院后,时间为2023年10月至2024年6月。采访录音,转录,并在ATLAS.ti编码。内容分析用于确定突出主题。分析团队将每个参与者的故事绘制成图表,以增强分析。结果共完成17次访谈(青少年8例,照顾者9例)。确定了三个主要主题:(1)急诊科临床医生的反应缺乏、混乱和不一致;(2)教育响应应该是量身定制的、适时的、私人的和自主的;(3)教育署提供的资源应赋予青少年和照顾者向前发展的权力。与会者推荐了克服护理障碍的资源和标准化ED干预措施,以更好地支持患者和家庭。结论:在本研究中,ED对非急性自杀风险的反应被描述为不充分。与会者建议提供额外资源,以安全地管理自杀念头并指导心理健康治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of emergency medicine
Annals of emergency medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
819
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Emergency Medicine, the official journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians, is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to improving the quality of care by publishing the highest quality science for emergency medicine and related medical specialties. Annals publishes original research, clinical reports, opinion, and educational information related to the practice, teaching, and research of emergency medicine. In addition to general emergency medicine topics, Annals regularly publishes articles on out-of-hospital emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, injury and disease prevention, health policy and ethics, disaster management, toxicology, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Man With Respiratory Failure. Woman With Chest Discomfort. Policy Statements. Pregnant in the Pit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1