Outcomes of bariatric surgery in Adolescents: A meta-analysis comparing three surgical techniques

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116354
Warda Ahmed , Kinza Jawed , Kashmala Hussain , Mehak Barolia , Syeda Sakina Mehdi , Aymen Ahmed , Russell Seth Martins , Faisal Ghulam Qureshi
{"title":"Outcomes of bariatric surgery in Adolescents: A meta-analysis comparing three surgical techniques","authors":"Warda Ahmed ,&nbsp;Kinza Jawed ,&nbsp;Kashmala Hussain ,&nbsp;Mehak Barolia ,&nbsp;Syeda Sakina Mehdi ,&nbsp;Aymen Ahmed ,&nbsp;Russell Seth Martins ,&nbsp;Faisal Ghulam Qureshi","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is used for managing obesity. Herein, we conducted the first meta-analysis directly comparing the three most performed MBS procedures among adolescents. Fourteen studies, comprising 13,994 patients, and comparing outcomes between at least two of laparoscopic gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in adolescents (age ≤21 years), were included. On subgroup analyses, SG (MD: −15.95 ​kg; −13.76 ​%) and RYGB (MD: −23.86 ​kg; −11.36 ​%) demonstrated a significantly greater absolute change in weight and percentage change in BMI than AGB, respectively. RYGB demonstrated a significantly greater absolute (MD: −1.68 ​kg/m) and percentage change in BMI (MD: −3.01 ​%) than SG. However, it was associated with a greater risk of post-operative complications than both SG (RR: 2.09) and AGB (RR: 3.51). Our meta-analysis shows that while RYGB is the most effective bariatric procedure for weight loss in adolescents, SG is much safer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 116354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102500176X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is used for managing obesity. Herein, we conducted the first meta-analysis directly comparing the three most performed MBS procedures among adolescents. Fourteen studies, comprising 13,994 patients, and comparing outcomes between at least two of laparoscopic gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) in adolescents (age ≤21 years), were included. On subgroup analyses, SG (MD: −15.95 ​kg; −13.76 ​%) and RYGB (MD: −23.86 ​kg; −11.36 ​%) demonstrated a significantly greater absolute change in weight and percentage change in BMI than AGB, respectively. RYGB demonstrated a significantly greater absolute (MD: −1.68 ​kg/m) and percentage change in BMI (MD: −3.01 ​%) than SG. However, it was associated with a greater risk of post-operative complications than both SG (RR: 2.09) and AGB (RR: 3.51). Our meta-analysis shows that while RYGB is the most effective bariatric procedure for weight loss in adolescents, SG is much safer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年减肥手术的结果:比较三种手术技术的荟萃分析
代谢和减肥手术(MBS)用于控制肥胖。在此,我们进行了第一次meta分析,直接比较了青少年中最常用的三种MBS手术。纳入了14项研究,包括13994名患者,并比较了至少两种腹腔镜胃旁路(RYGB),腹腔镜袖胃切除术(SG)和腹腔镜可调节胃束带(AGB)在青少年(年龄≤21岁)中的结果。亚组分析,SG (MD:−15.95 kg;- 13.76%)和RYGB (MD: - 23.86 kg;−11.36%)的体重绝对变化和BMI百分比变化分别明显大于AGB。与SG相比,RYGB表现出更大的绝对(MD: - 1.68 kg/m)和BMI百分比变化(MD: - 3.01%)。然而,与SG (RR: 2.09)和AGB (RR: 3.51)相比,它与术后并发症的风险更高。我们的荟萃分析显示,虽然RYGB是青少年减肥最有效的减肥方法,但SG更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of reintervention rates in mesh versus no-mesh inguinal hernia repair using electronic health records Fungating tumors, forgotten patients The suprapubic pseudosac crochet hook suspension technique in laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: An efficient alternative in pseudosac management Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia Decreased utilization of component separation techniques over time in complex abdominal wall reconstruction following introduction of preoperative botulinum toxin A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1