Neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces spinal excitability in Multiple Sclerosis patients with spasticity symptoms

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple sclerosis and related disorders Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2025.106457
Martina Scalia , Riccardo Borzuola , Martina Parrella , Giovanna Borriello , Francesco Sica , Fabrizia Monteleone , Andrea Macaluso
{"title":"Neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces spinal excitability in Multiple Sclerosis patients with spasticity symptoms","authors":"Martina Scalia ,&nbsp;Riccardo Borzuola ,&nbsp;Martina Parrella ,&nbsp;Giovanna Borriello ,&nbsp;Francesco Sica ,&nbsp;Fabrizia Monteleone ,&nbsp;Andrea Macaluso","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2025.106457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been recently proposed in patients with neurological diseases, such as spinal cord injuries and stroke, to improve symptoms of spasticity, resulting in both increased control of voluntary movements and improved functional ability in daily activities. Despite several authors suggest that these results could be related to a reduced spinal excitability, which is known to be higher in spastic patients, no previous studies investigated the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the effect of NMES in reducing spasticity. In addition, there are no studies in the literature adopting NMES to improve spasticity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Therefore, this study aims at comparing acute responses in spinal excitability, as measured by H-reflex, between MS patients with and without spasticity, following three experimental conditions: 1) isometric voluntary contraction (ISO) of the ankle plantar flexor muscles; 2) NMES passively applied (pNMES) to the ankle plantar flexor muscles; and 3) NMES superimposed onto isometric voluntary contraction (NMES+) of the same muscles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>15 MS patients with spasticity (MS+) and 15 MS patients without spasticity (MS-) took part in a single experimental session, which consisted in the application of NMES to the ankle plantar-flexor muscles in the most spastic and compromised leg. Following the assessment of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), participants were asked to perform 15 repetitions of 6 s at 20 % of MVIC, with 6 s of recovery between repetitions, during the three experimental conditions (ISO, pNMES, NMES+). Before and after each condition, soleus (SOL) H-reflex amplitudes were recorded by using surface electromyography (sEMG).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In MS+, H-reflex amplitude significantly decreased after both pNMES (<em>p</em> = 0.007) and NMES+ (<em>p</em> = 0.003), while it was unaltered after ISO (<em>p</em> = 0.829). In MS-, H-reflex amplitude did not change under any experimental condition (ISO: <em>p</em> = 0.383; pNMES: <em>p</em> = 0.328; NMES+: <em>p</em> = 0.087).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The reduction of H-reflex after pNMES and NMES+ can be attributed to a reduced spinal excitability in spastic MS patients, which may be attributed to presynaptic inhibition, recurrent inhibition, gamma-aminobutyric acid activity and persistent inward current. These results are highly relevant from both neurophysiological and clinical point of views, suggesting new approaches to manage spasticity symptoms in neurological patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 106457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034825001993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been recently proposed in patients with neurological diseases, such as spinal cord injuries and stroke, to improve symptoms of spasticity, resulting in both increased control of voluntary movements and improved functional ability in daily activities. Despite several authors suggest that these results could be related to a reduced spinal excitability, which is known to be higher in spastic patients, no previous studies investigated the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the effect of NMES in reducing spasticity. In addition, there are no studies in the literature adopting NMES to improve spasticity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Therefore, this study aims at comparing acute responses in spinal excitability, as measured by H-reflex, between MS patients with and without spasticity, following three experimental conditions: 1) isometric voluntary contraction (ISO) of the ankle plantar flexor muscles; 2) NMES passively applied (pNMES) to the ankle plantar flexor muscles; and 3) NMES superimposed onto isometric voluntary contraction (NMES+) of the same muscles.

Methods

15 MS patients with spasticity (MS+) and 15 MS patients without spasticity (MS-) took part in a single experimental session, which consisted in the application of NMES to the ankle plantar-flexor muscles in the most spastic and compromised leg. Following the assessment of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), participants were asked to perform 15 repetitions of 6 s at 20 % of MVIC, with 6 s of recovery between repetitions, during the three experimental conditions (ISO, pNMES, NMES+). Before and after each condition, soleus (SOL) H-reflex amplitudes were recorded by using surface electromyography (sEMG).

Results

In MS+, H-reflex amplitude significantly decreased after both pNMES (p = 0.007) and NMES+ (p = 0.003), while it was unaltered after ISO (p = 0.829). In MS-, H-reflex amplitude did not change under any experimental condition (ISO: p = 0.383; pNMES: p = 0.328; NMES+: p = 0.087).

Conclusion

The reduction of H-reflex after pNMES and NMES+ can be attributed to a reduced spinal excitability in spastic MS patients, which may be attributed to presynaptic inhibition, recurrent inhibition, gamma-aminobutyric acid activity and persistent inward current. These results are highly relevant from both neurophysiological and clinical point of views, suggesting new approaches to manage spasticity symptoms in neurological patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经肌肉电刺激降低多发性硬化症痉挛症状患者的脊髓兴奋性
背景神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)最近被建议用于神经系统疾病患者,如脊髓损伤和中风,以改善痉挛症状,从而增加对自主运动的控制和改善日常活动的功能能力。尽管一些作者认为这些结果可能与脊髓兴奋性降低有关,而脊髓兴奋性在痉挛患者中更高,但之前没有研究调查NMES在减轻痉挛作用下的神经生理机制。此外,文献中尚未见采用NMES改善多发性硬化症(MS)患者痉挛的研究。因此,本研究旨在比较有和无痉挛的MS患者的脊髓兴奋性的急性反应,通过h反射测量,在三个实验条件下:1)踝关节足底屈肌的等长自律性收缩(ISO);2) NMES被动应用(pNMES)于踝关节足底屈肌;3) NMES叠加在同一肌肉的等长自律性收缩(NMES+)上。方法15例伴有痉挛的MS患者(MS+)和15例无痉挛的MS患者(MS-)进行NMES对最痉挛和受损腿的踝关节跖屈肌的应用实验。在评估最大自主等距收缩(MVIC)后,参与者被要求在三种实验条件(ISO, pNMES, NMES+)中以20%的MVIC重复15次,每次6秒,重复之间有6秒的恢复时间。采用表面肌电图(sEMG)记录各组前后比目鱼肌(SOL) h反射振幅。结果MS+时,pNMES (p = 0.007)和NMES+ (p = 0.003)后h反射振幅均显著降低,ISO后无变化(p = 0.829)。在MS-中,h反射振幅在任何实验条件下都没有变化(ISO: p = 0.383;pNMES: p = 0.328;NMES+: p = 0.087)。结论pNMES和NMES+后h反射的减少可能与痉挛性MS患者脊髓兴奋性降低有关,这可能与突触前抑制、复发抑制、γ -氨基丁酸活性和持续内向电流有关。这些结果从神经生理学和临床的角度来看都是高度相关的,为神经系统患者治疗痉挛症状提供了新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
期刊最新文献
Bridging perspectives on comorbidities in multiple sclerosis: A pilot study with individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals Characterising executive functioning in the chronic phase of autoimmune encephalitis: A study by the Australian autoimmune encephalitis consortium Neurocognitive performance in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis Development of novel biomechanical outcomes using motion capture to characterize hand function in multiple sclerosis Cognitive-Motor dual-task assessments in people with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1