Towards reliable data in the scope of unmanned aircraft systems

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301914
Karolin Lohre , Harald Baier , Lukas Hardi , Andreas Attenberger
{"title":"Towards reliable data in the scope of unmanned aircraft systems","authors":"Karolin Lohre ,&nbsp;Harald Baier ,&nbsp;Lukas Hardi ,&nbsp;Andreas Attenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2025.301914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The goal of a digital forensic examination is to answer legal questions in the scope of IT systems. In order to come up with accurate answers, the data of the IT system at hand needs to be reliable. While the processing of digital traces of classical operating systems like Windows and its corresponding applications is well understood (especially with respect to the reliability of traces), emerging technologies often lack such an understanding of the trustworthiness of the examined data. In this work, we address the reliability of data in the scope of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). Although systems like UAS have become popular in various fields of application, digital forensic scientists and investigators currently lack an understanding of how to assess the correctness of UAS information, especially in the scope of Do-It-Yourself drone forensics. We shed light on common challenges when working with UAS data. Our main contribution is the introduction, explanation, and discussion of a conceptual framework to rate the reliability of UAS data. Our framework is based on three different categories representing three different levels of knowledge about the state of the UAS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 301914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281725000538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of a digital forensic examination is to answer legal questions in the scope of IT systems. In order to come up with accurate answers, the data of the IT system at hand needs to be reliable. While the processing of digital traces of classical operating systems like Windows and its corresponding applications is well understood (especially with respect to the reliability of traces), emerging technologies often lack such an understanding of the trustworthiness of the examined data. In this work, we address the reliability of data in the scope of Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). Although systems like UAS have become popular in various fields of application, digital forensic scientists and investigators currently lack an understanding of how to assess the correctness of UAS information, especially in the scope of Do-It-Yourself drone forensics. We shed light on common challenges when working with UAS data. Our main contribution is the introduction, explanation, and discussion of a conceptual framework to rate the reliability of UAS data. Our framework is based on three different categories representing three different levels of knowledge about the state of the UAS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
朝着可靠的数据在无人机系统的范围
数字法医检查的目标是回答IT系统范围内的法律问题。为了得到准确的答案,手头的IT系统的数据需要是可靠的。虽然传统操作系统(如Windows)及其相应应用程序的数字痕迹处理很好理解(特别是关于痕迹的可靠性),但新兴技术通常缺乏对检查数据可信度的理解。在这项工作中,我们解决了无人机系统(UAS)范围内数据的可靠性。尽管像UAS这样的系统在各个应用领域都很受欢迎,但数字法医科学家和调查人员目前对如何评估UAS信息的正确性缺乏了解,特别是在diy无人机取证的范围内。我们在处理无人机数据时阐明了常见的挑战。我们的主要贡献是介绍、解释和讨论一个概念性框架来评价UAS数据的可靠性。我们的框架基于三个不同的类别,代表了关于无人机状态的三个不同层次的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
A forensic analysis framework for IoMT network traffic using temporal reconstruction and artefact profiling A case study on the use of Amazon visual ID facial recognition metadata in investigation Hybrid DN-MobileNet: A study on an effective framework for source camera identification from videos Editorial Board Mapping the Tor darkmarket ecosystem: A network analysis of topics, communication channels, and languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1