Are effects of antihypertensive treatment on lipoproteins merely "side-effects"? A comparison of prazosin and metoprolol.

Acta medica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1988-01-01
H Lithell, K Haglund, F Granath, J Ostman
{"title":"Are effects of antihypertensive treatment on lipoproteins merely \"side-effects\"? A comparison of prazosin and metoprolol.","authors":"H Lithell,&nbsp;K Haglund,&nbsp;F Granath,&nbsp;J Ostman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thirty-seven patients with a supine systolic blood pressure greater than 160 and/or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mmHg were enrolled in the study and treated for 6 months with prazosin and 6 months with metoprolol (in random order). Neither the systolic nor the diastolic blood pressures differed after the two types of treatment (median difference 0/0 mmHg). The mean and median differences in serum cholesterol, however, were 0.4 and 0.3 mmol/l respectively, which were 9 and 5% of the pretreatment values. The corresponding differences in the atherogenic index (in which cholesterol in high density lipoproteins is integrated) were 10 and 8% of the pretreatment values. This difference in the metabolic response to the two drugs at the same blood pressure level is most probably of importance in the long-term prevention of ischaemic heart disease, for which high levels of serum cholesterol and atherogenic index are major risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7011,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Scandinavica","volume":"223 6","pages":"531-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with a supine systolic blood pressure greater than 160 and/or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mmHg were enrolled in the study and treated for 6 months with prazosin and 6 months with metoprolol (in random order). Neither the systolic nor the diastolic blood pressures differed after the two types of treatment (median difference 0/0 mmHg). The mean and median differences in serum cholesterol, however, were 0.4 and 0.3 mmol/l respectively, which were 9 and 5% of the pretreatment values. The corresponding differences in the atherogenic index (in which cholesterol in high density lipoproteins is integrated) were 10 and 8% of the pretreatment values. This difference in the metabolic response to the two drugs at the same blood pressure level is most probably of importance in the long-term prevention of ischaemic heart disease, for which high levels of serum cholesterol and atherogenic index are major risk factors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降压治疗对脂蛋白的影响仅仅是“副作用”吗?哌唑嗪与美托洛尔的比较。
37名仰卧收缩压大于160和/或舒张压大于95 mmHg的患者参加了这项研究,并接受了6个月的吡唑嗪和6个月的美托洛尔治疗(随机顺序)。两种治疗后收缩压和舒张压均无差异(中位差0/0 mmHg)。然而,血清胆固醇的平均值和中位数差异分别为0.4和0.3 mmol/l,分别为预处理值的9%和5%。相应的动脉粥样硬化指数(高密度脂蛋白中胆固醇的综合指数)的差异为预处理值的10%和8%。在相同血压水平下,两种药物代谢反应的差异很可能对缺血性心脏病的长期预防很重要,而高水平的血清胆固醇和动脉粥样硬化指数是缺血性心脏病的主要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult hypophosphatasia. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis. A double-blind study in general practice. Assessment of D-dimer in plasma: diagnostic value in suspected deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Plasma and skeletal muscle electrolytes in patients on long-term diuretic therapy for arterial hypertension and/or congestive heart failure. Acute myocarditis. Serologic diagnosis, clinical findings and follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1