Knowledge coupling, medical education and patient care.

L L Weed
{"title":"Knowledge coupling, medical education and patient care.","authors":"L L Weed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical education and the acquisition of professional credentials do not guarantee that medical knowledge (information that is taught, apart from the reality of practice, or gleaned from the literature) will be coupled rigorously to the decision-making process of everyday clinical practice. The limitations of the unaided human mind in a memory-based educational system must be forthrightly acknowledged by those who would be responsible for curriculum reform, so the need for new premises and new tools will be recognized and implemented. Because of their knowledge of the many variables that are unique to them, the patients themselves must be given a much more central role in the process of medical care and medical education. Weaknesses of specialization and credentialing in the present obsolete system are analyzed. The behavior of a well-defined system of education and medical care, and the function of the performers within it, are described. Causes of resistance to curricular reform founded on new premises and use of new tools, such as computers, are considered. New computer tools, as components of a problem-solving decision support system (knowledge couplers, knowledge networks, the coupler editor and documentation system, and the computerized patient record), are described. How these might be incorporated into a new type of medical education curriculum is presented. Finally, new goals, within the context of the new premises being implemented into a new system of education and medical care, are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":77916,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in medical informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical education and the acquisition of professional credentials do not guarantee that medical knowledge (information that is taught, apart from the reality of practice, or gleaned from the literature) will be coupled rigorously to the decision-making process of everyday clinical practice. The limitations of the unaided human mind in a memory-based educational system must be forthrightly acknowledged by those who would be responsible for curriculum reform, so the need for new premises and new tools will be recognized and implemented. Because of their knowledge of the many variables that are unique to them, the patients themselves must be given a much more central role in the process of medical care and medical education. Weaknesses of specialization and credentialing in the present obsolete system are analyzed. The behavior of a well-defined system of education and medical care, and the function of the performers within it, are described. Causes of resistance to curricular reform founded on new premises and use of new tools, such as computers, are considered. New computer tools, as components of a problem-solving decision support system (knowledge couplers, knowledge networks, the coupler editor and documentation system, and the computerized patient record), are described. How these might be incorporated into a new type of medical education curriculum is presented. Finally, new goals, within the context of the new premises being implemented into a new system of education and medical care, are outlined.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识耦合、医学教育和病人护理。
医学教育和专业证书的获得并不能保证医学知识(除了实践的现实,或从文献中收集的信息外,所教授的信息)将与日常临床实践的决策过程紧密结合。那些负责课程改革的人必须坦率地承认,在以记忆为基础的教育体系中,人类头脑的独立存在的局限性,因此,对新场所和新工具的需求将得到认识和实施。由于患者对自身所特有的许多变量的了解,必须让他们自己在医疗护理和医学教育过程中发挥更重要的作用。分析了现行陈旧体制中专业化和资质认证的弊端。描述了一个定义明确的教育和医疗系统的行为,以及其中的执行者的功能。在新场地和使用新工具(如计算机)的基础上抵制课程改革的原因被考虑在内。描述了作为问题解决决策支持系统组成部分的新计算机工具(知识耦合器、知识网络、耦合器编辑器和文档系统以及计算机化病历)。提出了如何将这些内容纳入一种新型的医学教育课程。最后,概述了在新的教育和医疗系统中实施新房舍的背景下的新目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tying it all together: The Integrated Academic Information Management System being implemented at Maryland. Medical linguistics: automated indexing into SNOMED. Design of clinical database management systems and associated software to facilitate medical statistical research. Computer modeling of clinical judgment. Use of microcomputers in health and social service applications in developing nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1