Choosing death. Withdrawal from chronic dialysis without medical reason.

Acta medica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1988-01-01
J C Roberts, C M Kjellstrand
{"title":"Choosing death. Withdrawal from chronic dialysis without medical reason.","authors":"J C Roberts,&nbsp;C M Kjellstrand","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed patients who died on chronic dialysis because they stopped the treatment, although there was no technical dialysis complication or new medical complication. These patients preferred death to the stress of dialysis. This occurred in 26/1766 (1.5%) patients, and was responsible for 26/704 (4%) of all deaths. We compared these 26 patients to 40 competent patients who discontinued treatment when a medical complication arose. The patients were similar in most respects (age, sex, diagnosis, duration of dialysis, living situation, and type of dialysis) and had the same number of medical complications when starting dialysis. However, the patients who stopped dialysis were more often on home dialysis, 8/24 vs. 3/40 of the other patients (p less than 0.05). Overall, stopping was three times more common in home than in center patients (3.0% vs. 1.1%) (p less than 0.02). Relatives responding to a written interview felt that nurses and social workers but not physicians had been helpful in the difficult time surrounding the patient's decision and death. This study indicates that particularly home dialysis patients are at a high risk of discontinuing dialysis because of the stress of the dialysis procedure. A realistic introduction to and realization of their dialysis problems, better training and better psychological support, particularly from physicians, are necessary to eradicate this avoidable cause of death in chronic dialysis patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7011,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed patients who died on chronic dialysis because they stopped the treatment, although there was no technical dialysis complication or new medical complication. These patients preferred death to the stress of dialysis. This occurred in 26/1766 (1.5%) patients, and was responsible for 26/704 (4%) of all deaths. We compared these 26 patients to 40 competent patients who discontinued treatment when a medical complication arose. The patients were similar in most respects (age, sex, diagnosis, duration of dialysis, living situation, and type of dialysis) and had the same number of medical complications when starting dialysis. However, the patients who stopped dialysis were more often on home dialysis, 8/24 vs. 3/40 of the other patients (p less than 0.05). Overall, stopping was three times more common in home than in center patients (3.0% vs. 1.1%) (p less than 0.02). Relatives responding to a written interview felt that nurses and social workers but not physicians had been helpful in the difficult time surrounding the patient's decision and death. This study indicates that particularly home dialysis patients are at a high risk of discontinuing dialysis because of the stress of the dialysis procedure. A realistic introduction to and realization of their dialysis problems, better training and better psychological support, particularly from physicians, are necessary to eradicate this avoidable cause of death in chronic dialysis patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择死亡。无医学原因退出慢性透析。
我们分析了因停止治疗而死于慢性透析的患者,尽管没有技术性透析并发症或新的医学并发症。这些病人宁愿死也不愿忍受透析带来的压力。这种情况发生在26/1766(1.5%)例患者中,占所有死亡病例的26/704(4%)。我们将这26名患者与40名因医学并发症而停止治疗的合格患者进行了比较。患者在大多数方面(年龄、性别、诊断、透析持续时间、生活状况和透析类型)相似,并且在开始透析时具有相同数量的医学并发症。而停止透析的患者进行家庭透析的比例为8/24比3/40 (p < 0.05)。总体而言,在家中停药的发生率是中心患者的三倍(3.0%比1.1%)(p < 0.02)。接受书面采访的亲属认为,在病人做出决定和死亡的艰难时刻,护士和社会工作者(而不是医生)提供了帮助。这项研究表明,由于透析过程的压力,特别是家庭透析患者中断透析的风险很高。现实地介绍和认识他们的透析问题,更好的培训和更好的心理支持,特别是来自医生的支持,对于消除慢性透析患者中这一可避免的死亡原因是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adult hypophosphatasia. Thiazide prophylaxis of urolithiasis. A double-blind study in general practice. Assessment of D-dimer in plasma: diagnostic value in suspected deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Plasma and skeletal muscle electrolytes in patients on long-term diuretic therapy for arterial hypertension and/or congestive heart failure. Acute myocarditis. Serologic diagnosis, clinical findings and follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1