Risk factors and prevention of atherosclerosis: specific prevention directed to the high-risk patients.

Acta cardiologica. Supplementum Pub Date : 1988-01-01
F H Epstein
{"title":"Risk factors and prevention of atherosclerosis: specific prevention directed to the high-risk patients.","authors":"F H Epstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high-risk population strategy of coronary heart disease prevention are not alternatives but complement each other, both being parts of a comprehensive community programme. High-risk persons must be detected through screening and require more individual and intensive protection than persons at lesser risk for whom the population approach provides adequate preventive care. The relative effectiveness of the two strategies may be compared, using data from prospective epidemiological studies. The high-risk strategy alone compares well with a limited population strategy alone but the balance is shifted in favour of the population at large. In practice, it does not matter to compare the two strategies in isolation but to assess their effectiveness in combination; it can be shown that the combined effect is likely to make a major dent in the burden of disease in the population. It used to be thought and hoped that the discovery of new and more powerful risk factors would discriminate more sharply between future cases and non-cases of coronary heart disease and thus concentrate the majority of new events in a minority of the population. An attempt was made to show that new advances will add to the preventive potential inherent in risk factors but are not likely to identify future victims of the disease with such precision that the high-risk strategy would eventually supplant the population strategy. Instead, new screening strategies must be developed to detect and protect to the greatest possible extent all the risk carriers who are scattered, in terms of single and multiple risk factors, all-over the population. A major responsibility for the effectiveness of the high-risk strategy is carried by the practicing physician, to select the best treatment for individuals and their families and to encourage adherence to a new life style, as well as compliance with drug therapy, if indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":75374,"journal":{"name":"Acta cardiologica. Supplementum","volume":"29 ","pages":"141-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cardiologica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high-risk population strategy of coronary heart disease prevention are not alternatives but complement each other, both being parts of a comprehensive community programme. High-risk persons must be detected through screening and require more individual and intensive protection than persons at lesser risk for whom the population approach provides adequate preventive care. The relative effectiveness of the two strategies may be compared, using data from prospective epidemiological studies. The high-risk strategy alone compares well with a limited population strategy alone but the balance is shifted in favour of the population at large. In practice, it does not matter to compare the two strategies in isolation but to assess their effectiveness in combination; it can be shown that the combined effect is likely to make a major dent in the burden of disease in the population. It used to be thought and hoped that the discovery of new and more powerful risk factors would discriminate more sharply between future cases and non-cases of coronary heart disease and thus concentrate the majority of new events in a minority of the population. An attempt was made to show that new advances will add to the preventive potential inherent in risk factors but are not likely to identify future victims of the disease with such precision that the high-risk strategy would eventually supplant the population strategy. Instead, new screening strategies must be developed to detect and protect to the greatest possible extent all the risk carriers who are scattered, in terms of single and multiple risk factors, all-over the population. A major responsibility for the effectiveness of the high-risk strategy is carried by the practicing physician, to select the best treatment for individuals and their families and to encourage adherence to a new life style, as well as compliance with drug therapy, if indicated.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉粥样硬化的危险因素与预防:针对高危患者的针对性预防。
预防冠心病高危人群战略不是相互替代的,而是相辅相成的,两者都是综合社区方案的组成部分。必须通过筛检发现高危人群,与风险较低的人群相比,他们需要更多的个人和密集的保护,而人口方法可以为他们提供充分的预防保健。可以使用前瞻性流行病学研究的数据比较这两种策略的相对有效性。单独的高风险策略比单独的有限人口策略要好,但平衡被转移到有利于广大人口。在实践中,单独比较这两种战略并不重要,重要的是综合评估它们的有效性;可以证明,两者的综合作用很可能大大减轻人口的疾病负担。过去人们认为并希望,新的更强大的风险因素的发现将更明显地区分未来的冠心病病例和非病例,从而将大多数新病例集中在少数人群中。人们试图表明,新的进展将增加风险因素固有的预防潜力,但不太可能如此精确地确定该疾病的未来受害者,从而使高风险战略最终取代人口战略。相反,必须制定新的筛查策略,以最大限度地发现和保护所有分散的风险携带者,就单一和多种风险因素而言,在整个人口中。对高风险策略的有效性的主要责任是由执业医生承担,为个人及其家庭选择最佳治疗方法,鼓励坚持新的生活方式,并在必要时遵守药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A theory of the heartbeat. Open diastole and closed systole. The use of gene probes to investigate the etiology of hyperlipidaemia and arterial diseases. Implications of the main therapeutic trials conducted in hypertension. Diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. Calcium and hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1