Low vision aids--evaluation in a general eye department.

R C Humphry, G M Thompson
{"title":"Low vision aids--evaluation in a general eye department.","authors":"R C Humphry,&nbsp;G M Thompson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review was undertaken of all patients referred for Low Vision Aid (LVA) assessment in the Wandsworth Health Authority over eighteen months. The majority of referrals (72 per cent) could have near visual acuity improved and were prescribed an LVA. Of those prescribed only 23 per cent found the LVA useful at home. Fifty-three per cent of patients preferred a high reading addition or hand magnifier to the prescribed LVA. The most helpful indications to predict success in using an LVA were found to be age of the patient, the type of eye disease and the strength of magnification required.</p>","PeriodicalId":76757,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom","volume":"105 ( Pt 3) ","pages":"296-303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A review was undertaken of all patients referred for Low Vision Aid (LVA) assessment in the Wandsworth Health Authority over eighteen months. The majority of referrals (72 per cent) could have near visual acuity improved and were prescribed an LVA. Of those prescribed only 23 per cent found the LVA useful at home. Fifty-three per cent of patients preferred a high reading addition or hand magnifier to the prescribed LVA. The most helpful indications to predict success in using an LVA were found to be age of the patient, the type of eye disease and the strength of magnification required.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低视力辅助设备——在普通眼科进行评估。
在过去的18个月里,对旺兹沃思卫生局所有接受低视力辅助(LVA)评估的患者进行了审查。大多数转介者(72%)的近视力可以改善,并规定了LVA。在处方中,只有23%的人认为LVA在家里有用。53%的患者更喜欢高读数附加或手持放大镜,而不是规定的LVA。预测使用LVA成功最有用的指征是患者的年龄、眼病类型和所需的放大率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reis-Bucklers' corneal dystrophy. Fluorescence angiography. HYPERTENSIVE RETINOPATHY. Carotid artery disease. Recombinant DNA Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1