A cost-effectiveness comparison of the intraocular lens and the contact lens in aphakia.

L M Davies, M F Drummond, E G Woodward, R J Buckley
{"title":"A cost-effectiveness comparison of the intraocular lens and the contact lens in aphakia.","authors":"L M Davies,&nbsp;M F Drummond,&nbsp;E G Woodward,&nbsp;R J Buckley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is currently interest in the effectiveness and cost of the intraocular lens as compared with other methods of correcting aphakia following cataract extraction. We have undertaken a retrospective review of patients undergoing cataract surgery by the extracapsular method at Moorfields Eye Hospital during the period January 1982 to July 1983. From the total population we selected at random two groups of patients, having their aphakia corrected either by means of a contact lens or an intraocular implant. Patients under the age of 60 years and those with complicating illnesses were excluded from the study. Using case notes, we followed the sample patients from the time of referral until one year after the operation, and recorded a number of clinical and economic variables such as waiting time for operation, length of inpatient stay, incidence of per- and post-operative complications, number of follow-up visits, final visual acuity and (for the contact lens patients) waiting time for lens issue and average daily wearing time. We found that the visual acuities obtained, and the total costs to society, were similar for the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":76757,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom","volume":"105 ( Pt 3) ","pages":"304-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is currently interest in the effectiveness and cost of the intraocular lens as compared with other methods of correcting aphakia following cataract extraction. We have undertaken a retrospective review of patients undergoing cataract surgery by the extracapsular method at Moorfields Eye Hospital during the period January 1982 to July 1983. From the total population we selected at random two groups of patients, having their aphakia corrected either by means of a contact lens or an intraocular implant. Patients under the age of 60 years and those with complicating illnesses were excluded from the study. Using case notes, we followed the sample patients from the time of referral until one year after the operation, and recorded a number of clinical and economic variables such as waiting time for operation, length of inpatient stay, incidence of per- and post-operative complications, number of follow-up visits, final visual acuity and (for the contact lens patients) waiting time for lens issue and average daily wearing time. We found that the visual acuities obtained, and the total costs to society, were similar for the two groups.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工晶状体与隐形眼镜治疗无晶状体的成本-效果比较。
目前,人们对人工晶状体与其他矫正白内障摘除术后无晶状体的方法相比的有效性和成本感兴趣。我们对1982年1月至1983年7月期间在Moorfields眼科医院接受白内障囊外手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们从总体人群中随机选择两组患者,通过隐形眼镜或眼内植入矫正无晶状体。年龄在60岁以下的患者和患有并发症的患者被排除在研究之外。使用病例记录,我们对样本患者进行了随访,从转诊到手术后一年,并记录了许多临床和经济变量,如手术等待时间、住院时间、手术前后并发症的发生率、随访次数、最终视力、(对于隐形眼镜患者)等待配戴眼镜的时间和平均每日佩戴时间。我们发现,两组人获得的视力和对社会的总成本是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reis-Bucklers' corneal dystrophy. Fluorescence angiography. HYPERTENSIVE RETINOPATHY. Carotid artery disease. Recombinant DNA Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1