Abdominal hysterectomy versus supravaginal uterine amputation: psychic factors.

P Kilkku, V Lehtinen, T Hirvonen, M Grönroos
{"title":"Abdominal hysterectomy versus supravaginal uterine amputation: psychic factors.","authors":"P Kilkku,&nbsp;V Lehtinen,&nbsp;T Hirvonen,&nbsp;M Grönroos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study, the psychic complaints after abdominal hysterectomy (n = 105) and supravaginal uterine amputation (n = 107) are investigated. The first author interviewed personally all the subjects preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. The proportion of subjects without psychic symptoms increased from 49.5% to 67.7% in the hysterectomy group (p less than 0.01) and from 53.3% to 76.8% in the amputation group (p less than 0.001). The difference between the groups at 3 years phase was significant (p less than 0.01). From the single symptoms, nervousness or irritability and depression, decreased during the follow-up period significantly in the amputation group but not in the hysterectomy group. The results clearly indicate that the view of an increased risk for depression or other psychic complications after removal of the uterus should be revised. On the other hand, the results support our earlier findings that supravaginal uterine amputation is still an applicable method in benign conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75497,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","volume":"202 ","pages":"62-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, the psychic complaints after abdominal hysterectomy (n = 105) and supravaginal uterine amputation (n = 107) are investigated. The first author interviewed personally all the subjects preoperatively and 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. The proportion of subjects without psychic symptoms increased from 49.5% to 67.7% in the hysterectomy group (p less than 0.01) and from 53.3% to 76.8% in the amputation group (p less than 0.001). The difference between the groups at 3 years phase was significant (p less than 0.01). From the single symptoms, nervousness or irritability and depression, decreased during the follow-up period significantly in the amputation group but not in the hysterectomy group. The results clearly indicate that the view of an increased risk for depression or other psychic complications after removal of the uterus should be revised. On the other hand, the results support our earlier findings that supravaginal uterine amputation is still an applicable method in benign conditions.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部子宫切除术与阴道上子宫截肢:心理因素。
本研究调查了腹部子宫切除术(105例)和阴道上子宫切除术(107例)术后的心理疾患。第一作者于术前及术后6周、6个月、1年、3年亲自对所有受试者进行访谈。无精神症状的受试者比例在子宫切除术组从49.5%上升到67.7% (p < 0.01),在截肢组从53.3%上升到76.8% (p < 0.001)。3年时各组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。从单一症状来看,神经紧张或烦躁和抑郁在截肢组随访期间明显减少,而子宫切除术组则没有。结果清楚地表明,子宫切除后抑郁或其他精神并发症风险增加的观点应该改变。另一方面,结果支持我们早期的发现,阴道上子宫截肢仍然是一种适用于良性条件的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of chronic critical leg ischaemia--a cost benefit analysis. The effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on wound healing. An experimental study. Open biliary tract surgery on 2023 patients based on personal experience. A clinical study. Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. Microinvasive lumbar disc surgery. A study on patients treated with microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy for disc herniation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1