Adoption studies: historical and methodological critique.

Psychiatric developments Pub Date : 1986-01-01
R J Cadoret
{"title":"Adoption studies: historical and methodological critique.","authors":"R J Cadoret","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The history of adoption studies and their use in separating heredity from environmental influences is reviewed. The adoptee separation paradigm became possible through changing social practices which formalized adoption procedures. In the earlier past of this century, the technique was used principally to investigate the relative importance of heredity and environment in the determination of IQ. It was not until the sixties that the technique was used to study the role of heredity in psychopathology. Genetic factors in alcoholism, criminality, personality disorders, antisocial personality, somatization disorder, affective disorder, hyperactivity and schizophrenia were assessed. The review analyses the potential interactions of confounding variables in such studies and how these can be controlled, and discusses the major methodological criticisms which have been raised. Although the predominant interest has been in the use of the technique to define genetic etiological factors in psychopathology, the paradigm is equally able to delineate precisely the role of environmental factors while controlling for heredity. With about 1 per cent of populations being adopted in Western countries, the further scope for such studies continues to hold promise.</p>","PeriodicalId":77773,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric developments","volume":"4 1","pages":"45-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of adoption studies and their use in separating heredity from environmental influences is reviewed. The adoptee separation paradigm became possible through changing social practices which formalized adoption procedures. In the earlier past of this century, the technique was used principally to investigate the relative importance of heredity and environment in the determination of IQ. It was not until the sixties that the technique was used to study the role of heredity in psychopathology. Genetic factors in alcoholism, criminality, personality disorders, antisocial personality, somatization disorder, affective disorder, hyperactivity and schizophrenia were assessed. The review analyses the potential interactions of confounding variables in such studies and how these can be controlled, and discusses the major methodological criticisms which have been raised. Although the predominant interest has been in the use of the technique to define genetic etiological factors in psychopathology, the paradigm is equally able to delineate precisely the role of environmental factors while controlling for heredity. With about 1 per cent of populations being adopted in Western countries, the further scope for such studies continues to hold promise.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收养研究:历史和方法论批判。
回顾了收养研究的历史及其在分离遗传和环境影响方面的应用。通过改变使收养程序正规化的社会实践,被收养人分离范式成为可能。在本世纪初,这项技术主要用于研究遗传和环境在智商决定中的相对重要性。直到20世纪60年代,这项技术才被用于研究遗传在精神病理学中的作用。对酗酒、犯罪、人格障碍、反社会人格、躯体化障碍、情感障碍、多动和精神分裂症的遗传因素进行了评估。这篇综述分析了这些研究中混杂变量的潜在相互作用,以及如何控制这些变量,并讨论了已经提出的主要方法批评。尽管主要的兴趣是使用该技术来定义精神病理学中的遗传病因,但该范式同样能够在控制遗传的同时精确地描述环境因素的作用。由于西方国家收养了大约1%的人口,因此这种研究的进一步范围仍有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avoidance behaviour and major depression in panic disorder: a report from the Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study. Rationale for the planned clinical trials with nerve growth factor in Alzheimer's disease. The Parental Bonding Instrument: psychometric properties reviewed. Two kinds of borderline concepts. Conceptual and empirical agreement between DSM-III, DIB, and Kernberg. Dreaming: the impact of life stress events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1