Examination of heterogeneity in 200 Danish breast cancer pedigrees.

S B Gilligan, I B Borecki
{"title":"Examination of heterogeneity in 200 Danish breast cancer pedigrees.","authors":"S B Gilligan, I B Borecki","doi":"10.1002/gepi.1370030711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical impression of the expression of breast cancer includes the notion of etiological heterogeneity. The incidence of breast cancer rises in postmenopausal women and is very rare among males. The roles of putative genetic susceptibility factors, changing estrogen levels, and possible environmental agents are not clearly defined as they relate to the differential incidences. Williams and Anderson (1984) proposed that a dominant major gene influences the risk for breast cancer in the set of Danish pedigrees ascertained by Jacobsen and analyzed in the present investigation. Williams and Anderson evaluated the internal consistency of their conclusions by evaluating heterogeneity within pedigrees that were partitioned into sibships based on relation to the proband; they found no evidence of heterogeneity. In contrast, Elston and Bailey-Wilson (this volume) carried out a test of consistency of a dominant major gene model with the entire Jacobsen data set and found support for the notion of heterogeneity. An alternative to the search for heterogeneity within lineages, as done by Williams and Anderson, is to seek heterogeneity between families, based on clinically relevant data.","PeriodicalId":77852,"journal":{"name":"Genetic epidemiology. Supplement","volume":"1 ","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/gepi.1370030711","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic epidemiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.1370030711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The clinical impression of the expression of breast cancer includes the notion of etiological heterogeneity. The incidence of breast cancer rises in postmenopausal women and is very rare among males. The roles of putative genetic susceptibility factors, changing estrogen levels, and possible environmental agents are not clearly defined as they relate to the differential incidences. Williams and Anderson (1984) proposed that a dominant major gene influences the risk for breast cancer in the set of Danish pedigrees ascertained by Jacobsen and analyzed in the present investigation. Williams and Anderson evaluated the internal consistency of their conclusions by evaluating heterogeneity within pedigrees that were partitioned into sibships based on relation to the proband; they found no evidence of heterogeneity. In contrast, Elston and Bailey-Wilson (this volume) carried out a test of consistency of a dominant major gene model with the entire Jacobsen data set and found support for the notion of heterogeneity. An alternative to the search for heterogeneity within lineages, as done by Williams and Anderson, is to seek heterogeneity between families, based on clinically relevant data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
200个丹麦乳腺癌家系的异质性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic epidemiology: applications and comparisons of methods. Proceedings of Genetic Analysis Workshop IV. Snowbird, Utah, October 5-7, 1985. Genetic analysis workshop IV: Huntington disease linkage analysis, data description. A log-linear model for binary pedigree data. Linkage analysis of breast cancer among Utah and Dutch families using the sib-pair test. Linkage analysis of Dutch families at high risk for breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1