Is twice daily prophylaxis with salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate effective in the management of asthma?

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
J R Mikhail, S Daly
{"title":"Is twice daily prophylaxis with salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate effective in the management of asthma?","authors":"J R Mikhail,&nbsp;S Daly","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An open, crossover study lasting 8 weeks was performed to establish if a twice daily regimen of combined inhalation of salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate from a single inhaler was as effective in controlling asthma as the 4-times daily regimen. The results from these two treatment periods were compared with an initial 4-week baseline period when all patients received the same agents from separate inhalers on a 4-times daily dose schedule. Twenty stable asthmatics were entered into the study and 19 completed the three treatment periods. The clinic lung function data, symptomatic inhaler usage, requests for additional therapy and physician's subjective assessment of treatment showed that all three treatment regimens were similarly effective in managing the patients' asthma. There was no significant difference between the mean PEFR measurements taken 4 times each day between the two treatment regimens of the combination inhaler. However, except for PEFR in the afternoon, the mean values for both treatment schedules of the combination inhaler were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than those during the separate inhaler baseline period. More than half the patients considered that both treatment schedules of the combination inhaler provided better control of their asthma than treatment with the separate inhalers, and the majority preferred the twice daily regimen to the 4-times daily regimen. The results, overall, showed that in stable asthmatics the combined administration of salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate from one inhaler provides significantly better therapy than the same agents from separate inhalers and that the twice daily dose schedule of the combination inhaler is equally as effective as a 4-times daily regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 10","pages":"648-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An open, crossover study lasting 8 weeks was performed to establish if a twice daily regimen of combined inhalation of salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate from a single inhaler was as effective in controlling asthma as the 4-times daily regimen. The results from these two treatment periods were compared with an initial 4-week baseline period when all patients received the same agents from separate inhalers on a 4-times daily dose schedule. Twenty stable asthmatics were entered into the study and 19 completed the three treatment periods. The clinic lung function data, symptomatic inhaler usage, requests for additional therapy and physician's subjective assessment of treatment showed that all three treatment regimens were similarly effective in managing the patients' asthma. There was no significant difference between the mean PEFR measurements taken 4 times each day between the two treatment regimens of the combination inhaler. However, except for PEFR in the afternoon, the mean values for both treatment schedules of the combination inhaler were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than those during the separate inhaler baseline period. More than half the patients considered that both treatment schedules of the combination inhaler provided better control of their asthma than treatment with the separate inhalers, and the majority preferred the twice daily regimen to the 4-times daily regimen. The results, overall, showed that in stable asthmatics the combined administration of salbutamol and beclomethasone dipropionate from one inhaler provides significantly better therapy than the same agents from separate inhalers and that the twice daily dose schedule of the combination inhaler is equally as effective as a 4-times daily regimen.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日两次沙丁胺醇和二丙酸倍氯米松预防治疗哮喘有效吗?
进行了一项持续8周的开放交叉研究,以确定每日两次联合吸入沙丁胺醇和二丙酸倍氯米松的方案是否与每日4次方案一样有效。这两个治疗期的结果与最初的4周基线期进行了比较,当时所有患者以4次每日剂量计划从不同的吸入器中接受相同的药物。20例稳定期哮喘患者进入研究,其中19例完成了三个治疗期。临床肺功能数据、症状性吸入器的使用、额外治疗的要求以及医生对治疗的主观评估表明,所有三种治疗方案在治疗患者哮喘方面同样有效。在两种联合吸入器治疗方案之间,每天4次的平均PEFR测量值无显著差异。然而,除下午PEFR外,联合吸入器两种治疗方案的平均值均显著高于单独吸入器基线期(p < 0.05)。超过一半的患者认为联合吸入器的两种治疗方案比单独吸入器治疗更好地控制了他们的哮喘,大多数患者更喜欢每天两次的方案而不是每天4次的方案。总的来说,结果表明,在稳定的哮喘患者中,从一个吸入器中联合使用沙丁胺醇和二丙酸倍氯米松的治疗效果明显优于从单独的吸入器中使用相同的药物,并且每天两次的联合吸入器剂量计划与每天4次的治疗方案同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1