Terbutaline pressurised aerosol inhaled via a Nebuhaler--an effective alternative to subcutaneous adrenaline for treatment of acute severe asthma.

P Youngchaiyud, S Charoenratanakul
{"title":"Terbutaline pressurised aerosol inhaled via a Nebuhaler--an effective alternative to subcutaneous adrenaline for treatment of acute severe asthma.","authors":"P Youngchaiyud,&nbsp;S Charoenratanakul","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study was designed to compare terbutaline inhaled via a 750 ml spacer (Nebuhaler) with subcutaneous adrenaline injection as a first-line treatment for acute severe asthma. Patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups, receiving either 2 X 4 mg of inhaled terbutaline followed by 2 X 0.5 mg subcutaneous adrenaline (22 patients) or the same drugs in reverse order (24 patients). All patients received a further 2 mg inhaled terbutaline to assess remaining bronchodilator reversibility. Initial treatment with terbutaline produced near maximal bronchodilation (FEV1, FVC), whilst initial treatment with adrenaline did not. Terbutaline also reduced symptoms of dyspnoea and wheeze to a greater extent than adrenaline, and was better tolerated with respect to heart rate and side-effects such as tremor. In conclusion, terbutaline inhaled via Nebuhaler was at least as effective as subcutaneous adrenaline, produced fewer side-effects, and hence can be recommended for initial treatment of acute severe asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12053,"journal":{"name":"European journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"70 5","pages":"284-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was designed to compare terbutaline inhaled via a 750 ml spacer (Nebuhaler) with subcutaneous adrenaline injection as a first-line treatment for acute severe asthma. Patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups, receiving either 2 X 4 mg of inhaled terbutaline followed by 2 X 0.5 mg subcutaneous adrenaline (22 patients) or the same drugs in reverse order (24 patients). All patients received a further 2 mg inhaled terbutaline to assess remaining bronchodilator reversibility. Initial treatment with terbutaline produced near maximal bronchodilation (FEV1, FVC), whilst initial treatment with adrenaline did not. Terbutaline also reduced symptoms of dyspnoea and wheeze to a greater extent than adrenaline, and was better tolerated with respect to heart rate and side-effects such as tremor. In conclusion, terbutaline inhaled via Nebuhaler was at least as effective as subcutaneous adrenaline, produced fewer side-effects, and hence can be recommended for initial treatment of acute severe asthma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过Nebuhaler吸入特布他林加压气雾剂-一种有效的替代皮下肾上腺素治疗急性严重哮喘。
该研究旨在比较通过750毫升间隔剂(Nebuhaler)吸入特布他林与皮下肾上腺素注射作为急性严重哮喘的一线治疗。患者被随机分配到两个治疗组,接受2 × 4mg吸入特布他林后皮下注射2 × 0.5 mg肾上腺素(22例)或相反顺序服用相同药物(24例)。所有患者进一步吸入2mg特布他林以评估剩余支气管扩张剂可逆性。最初用特布他林治疗产生接近最大的支气管扩张(FEV1, FVC),而最初用肾上腺素治疗没有。特布他林还能比肾上腺素更大程度地减轻呼吸困难和喘息症状,并且在心率和震颤等副作用方面耐受性更好。综上所述,通过Nebuhaler吸入特布他林至少与皮下肾上腺素一样有效,产生的副作用更少,因此可推荐用于急性严重哮喘的初始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microalbuminuria and the Presence of Hypoxemia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Two-Phase Lung Damage Mechanisms For COVID-19 Disease, and Driving Force and Selectivity in Leukecyte Recruitment and Migration Lung Cancer and Isolated Adrenal Metastases: Different Disease? Diaphragmatic Pacing as an Alternative to Mechanical Ventilation: Early Experience from a Developing Country Acute Pneumonia: Biological Rules and Laws require Attention and Respect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1