CT evaluation of the equivocal pulmonary nodule

Murray A. Howe, Barry H. Gross
{"title":"CT evaluation of the equivocal pulmonary nodule","authors":"Murray A. Howe,&nbsp;Barry H. Gross","doi":"10.1016/0730-4862(87)90012-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the setting of a questionable pulmonary nodule demonstrated by conventional radiographs, the place of CT in the diagnostic algorithm is not well established. We reviewed our experience in 50 consecutive patients referred to CT for a “possible pulmonary nodule.” From the chest radiographs we noted nodule location, maximum dimension, presence on one or both views, and presence on a previous radiograph (&gt; 1 year old), and nodules were categorized as “likely” or “unlikely” to be real parenchymal lesions based on radiographic appearance. Of a total of 56 questionable nodules, CT demonstrated no abnormality in 21 cases, parenchymal nodules in 16, scarring, atelectasis, or infiltrate in 11, and normal structural variants in 8. True pulmonary nodules were statistically significantly more frequently categorized as “likely” lesions than normal variants or no disease, but this was not of a magnitude to be clinically useful. Based on analysis of various radiographic features of equivocal nodules and their subsequent outcomes, we suggest a radiologic approach to the equivocal pulmonary nodule.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77839,"journal":{"name":"Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0730-4862(87)90012-6","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0730486287900126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In the setting of a questionable pulmonary nodule demonstrated by conventional radiographs, the place of CT in the diagnostic algorithm is not well established. We reviewed our experience in 50 consecutive patients referred to CT for a “possible pulmonary nodule.” From the chest radiographs we noted nodule location, maximum dimension, presence on one or both views, and presence on a previous radiograph (> 1 year old), and nodules were categorized as “likely” or “unlikely” to be real parenchymal lesions based on radiographic appearance. Of a total of 56 questionable nodules, CT demonstrated no abnormality in 21 cases, parenchymal nodules in 16, scarring, atelectasis, or infiltrate in 11, and normal structural variants in 8. True pulmonary nodules were statistically significantly more frequently categorized as “likely” lesions than normal variants or no disease, but this was not of a magnitude to be clinically useful. Based on analysis of various radiographic features of equivocal nodules and their subsequent outcomes, we suggest a radiologic approach to the equivocal pulmonary nodule.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊性肺结节的CT评价
在常规x线片显示的可疑肺结节的情况下,CT在诊断算法中的地位尚未得到很好的确立。我们回顾了连续50例因“可能的肺结节”而接受CT检查的患者的经验。从胸片上我们记录了结节的位置、最大尺寸、单侧或双侧表现以及之前的x线片表现(>根据影像学表现将结节分为“可能”或“不太可能”为真正的实质病变。在56例可疑结节中,CT未见异常21例,实质结节16例,瘢痕、肺不张或浸润11例,正常结构变异8例。在统计学上,真正的肺结节被归类为“可能”病变的频率明显高于正常变异体或无疾病,但这种程度不足以在临床上发挥作用。基于对模糊性肺结节的各种影像学特征及其后续结果的分析,我们建议对模糊性肺结节采用放射学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calendar CT in congenitally-corrected transposition of the great vessels MRI in epilepsy CT appearance of low attenuation areas in basal ganglia in childhood: Report of 23 cases Post-surgical anterior pseudomeningocele presenting as an abdominal mass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1