Sequential pulse defibrillation in man: comparison of thresholds in normal subjects and those with cardiac disease.

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1987-06-01
D L Jones, G J Klein, G M Guiraudon, A D Sharma, M J Kallok, W A Tacker, J D Bourland
{"title":"Sequential pulse defibrillation in man: comparison of thresholds in normal subjects and those with cardiac disease.","authors":"D L Jones,&nbsp;G J Klein,&nbsp;G M Guiraudon,&nbsp;A D Sharma,&nbsp;M J Kallok,&nbsp;W A Tacker,&nbsp;J D Bourland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared the parameters describing the defibrillation threshold in patients with normal hearts and in patients with ischemic heart disease, using a special electrode system and sequential pulses of current. Twenty-eight patients consented to the study (mean age: 36.6 +/- 10.1 years; mean mass: 80.7 +/- 13.8 kg). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (relatively normal hearts). Six patients had a history of previous myocardial infarction and aneurysm or coronary artery disease; and one patient had been resuscitated from an episode of sudden death, without evidence of consequent myocardial damage. For 26 patients, defibrillation thresholds were determined intraoperatively by passing sequential pulses through a catheter electrode and epicardial mesh electrode. For 2 patients defibrillation thresholds were determined during electrophysiologic study, after ventricular fibrillation was induced by programmed stimulation, by passing sequential pulses through a catheter and skin-patch electrode. Parameters for sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds between the two groups did not differ appreciably. Total energy for patients with normal hearts averaged 9.9 +/- 6.3 J compared to 8.9 +/- 4.6 J for patients with cardiac disease. No patient with cardiac disease had defibrillation parameters that exceeded the range of the normal patients. These results suggest that the presence of cardiac disease may not significantly alter the parameters necessary for successful defibrillation when using sequential pulses for delivery of energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"21 3","pages":"166-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We compared the parameters describing the defibrillation threshold in patients with normal hearts and in patients with ischemic heart disease, using a special electrode system and sequential pulses of current. Twenty-eight patients consented to the study (mean age: 36.6 +/- 10.1 years; mean mass: 80.7 +/- 13.8 kg). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (relatively normal hearts). Six patients had a history of previous myocardial infarction and aneurysm or coronary artery disease; and one patient had been resuscitated from an episode of sudden death, without evidence of consequent myocardial damage. For 26 patients, defibrillation thresholds were determined intraoperatively by passing sequential pulses through a catheter electrode and epicardial mesh electrode. For 2 patients defibrillation thresholds were determined during electrophysiologic study, after ventricular fibrillation was induced by programmed stimulation, by passing sequential pulses through a catheter and skin-patch electrode. Parameters for sequential pulse defibrillation thresholds between the two groups did not differ appreciably. Total energy for patients with normal hearts averaged 9.9 +/- 6.3 J compared to 8.9 +/- 4.6 J for patients with cardiac disease. No patient with cardiac disease had defibrillation parameters that exceeded the range of the normal patients. These results suggest that the presence of cardiac disease may not significantly alter the parameters necessary for successful defibrillation when using sequential pulses for delivery of energy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人序贯脉冲除颤:正常人和心脏病患者阈值的比较
我们使用一种特殊的电极系统和顺序脉冲电流,比较了描述正常心脏患者和缺血性心脏病患者除颤阈值的参数。28名患者同意这项研究(平均年龄:36.6±10.1岁;平均质量:80.7±13.8 kg)。21名患者接受了沃尔夫-帕金森-怀特综合征(相对正常的心脏)手术。6例患者既往有心肌梗死、动脉瘤或冠状动脉疾病史;还有一名患者从猝死中复苏,没有心肌损伤的迹象。对于26例患者,术中通过导管电极和心外膜网状电极连续脉冲来确定除颤阈值。2例患者在程序性刺激诱发心室颤动后,通过导管和皮肤贴片电极连续传递脉冲,在电生理学研究中确定除颤阈值。两组间序贯脉冲除颤阈值参数无明显差异。心脏正常患者的总能量平均为9.9 +/- 6.3 J,而心脏病患者的总能量平均为8.9 +/- 4.6 J。无心脏病患者除颤参数超出正常患者范围。这些结果表明,当使用顺序脉冲传递能量时,心脏疾病的存在可能不会显著改变成功除颤所需的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical fitness in the elderly. Anesthesia delivery systems. Effects of using potassium adsorption filters on saline-filled and saline-removed methods for the removal of potassium from red blood cell solutions Plasma viscosity and whole blood viscosity as diagnostic tools of blood abnormalities by using simple syringe method A technique for measuring spatial distribution of electromagnetic fields created by radio-frequency coils in MRI scanners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1