A dose-response study of inhaled terbutaline administered via Nebuhaler or nebuliser to asthmatic children.

M I Blackhall, S R O'Donnell
{"title":"A dose-response study of inhaled terbutaline administered via Nebuhaler or nebuliser to asthmatic children.","authors":"M I Blackhall,&nbsp;S R O'Donnell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 12, symptom-free, asthmatic children, aged 5-10 years, responses (increases in FEV1) were measured to cumulative doses of inhaled terbutaline delivered by two methods: a) 5 breaths from a 750 ml spacer (Nebuhaler) attached to a metered dose aerosol (doses were 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg); and b) by face mask attached to a Bennett twin-jet nebuliser containing terbutaline solution (doses were 1, 2, 4 and 8 mg in 2 ml). Responses were dose-related by both methods and the log dose-response lines were parallel. Twice the dose of nebulised terbutaline was required to give responses equivalent to those seen with the Nebuhaler (significant difference between the lines, ANOVA, P = 0.05). The highest doses given by either method resulted in achievement of at least 80% of the maximum possible improvement in respiratory function (i.e. predicted FEV1 (50th centile) minus basal FEV1) with no effects on pulse rate. Thus, the use of the Nebuhaler with terbutaline metered dose aerosol is at least as effective as administration of the same total dose by nebuliser in children who are not in acute respiratory difficulty. Also, it produces a dose-related bronchodilator effect, without pulse-rate effects, for doses of terbutaline between 0.5 to 4 mg (2 to 16 puffs of the metered dose (0.25 mg) aerosol).</p>","PeriodicalId":12053,"journal":{"name":"European journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"71 2","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 12, symptom-free, asthmatic children, aged 5-10 years, responses (increases in FEV1) were measured to cumulative doses of inhaled terbutaline delivered by two methods: a) 5 breaths from a 750 ml spacer (Nebuhaler) attached to a metered dose aerosol (doses were 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg); and b) by face mask attached to a Bennett twin-jet nebuliser containing terbutaline solution (doses were 1, 2, 4 and 8 mg in 2 ml). Responses were dose-related by both methods and the log dose-response lines were parallel. Twice the dose of nebulised terbutaline was required to give responses equivalent to those seen with the Nebuhaler (significant difference between the lines, ANOVA, P = 0.05). The highest doses given by either method resulted in achievement of at least 80% of the maximum possible improvement in respiratory function (i.e. predicted FEV1 (50th centile) minus basal FEV1) with no effects on pulse rate. Thus, the use of the Nebuhaler with terbutaline metered dose aerosol is at least as effective as administration of the same total dose by nebuliser in children who are not in acute respiratory difficulty. Also, it produces a dose-related bronchodilator effect, without pulse-rate effects, for doses of terbutaline between 0.5 to 4 mg (2 to 16 puffs of the metered dose (0.25 mg) aerosol).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘儿童经Nebuhaler或雾化器吸入特布他林的剂量反应研究。
在12名5-10岁无症状的哮喘儿童中,通过两种方法测量吸入特布他林累积剂量的反应(FEV1增加):a)从750 ml间隔器(Nebuhaler)中吸入5次呼吸,并将其附着在计量剂量的气溶胶上(剂量分别为0.5、1、2和4 mg);b)通过面罩连接含有特布他林溶液的Bennett双喷射喷雾器(剂量分别为1、2、4和8 mg / 2ml)。两种方法的反应均与剂量相关,对数剂量-反应线平行。需要两倍剂量的特布他林雾化才能产生与Nebuhaler相同的反应(两线之间的显著差异,方差分析,P = 0.05)。两种方法给予的最高剂量至少达到最大可能呼吸功能改善的80%(即预测FEV1(50百分位数)减去基础FEV1),而对脉搏率没有影响。因此,在没有急性呼吸困难的儿童中,使用Nebuhaler与特布他林计量气溶胶至少与使用相同总剂量的雾化器一样有效。此外,对于0.5至4mg特布他林剂量(计量剂量(0.25 mg)气溶胶的2至16支),它会产生与剂量相关的支气管扩张效应,而没有脉搏率效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microalbuminuria and the Presence of Hypoxemia in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Two-Phase Lung Damage Mechanisms For COVID-19 Disease, and Driving Force and Selectivity in Leukecyte Recruitment and Migration Lung Cancer and Isolated Adrenal Metastases: Different Disease? Diaphragmatic Pacing as an Alternative to Mechanical Ventilation: Early Experience from a Developing Country Acute Pneumonia: Biological Rules and Laws require Attention and Respect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1