[Evaluation of computerized tomograms using a black and white and a color monitor: an ROC (receiver operation characteristic) comparison].

Digitale Bilddiagnostik Pub Date : 1987-09-01
G Rockstroh, K H Rotte, E Kriedemann, H Cobet, F Boitz, N Cimanowski
{"title":"[Evaluation of computerized tomograms using a black and white and a color monitor: an ROC (receiver operation characteristic) comparison].","authors":"G Rockstroh,&nbsp;K H Rotte,&nbsp;E Kriedemann,&nbsp;H Cobet,&nbsp;F Boitz,&nbsp;N Cimanowski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different views about the value of a colour monitor for the evaluation of computer tomograms have prompted us to carry out this ROC (Receiver Operation Characteristic) examination. The latter was based on patient computer tomograms in which lesions of the liver were simulated by image manipulation. 5 radiologists analysed the image material (a) on a black-and-white monitor, (b) on a colour monitor, and (c) simultaneously on a black-and-white and a colour monitor. The study shows that the use of a colour monitor gives no essentially different result than evaluation with a black-and-white monitor. The slightly better result of 2% more true positive findings with simultaneous representation of black-and-white and colour image relative to the sole use of black-and-white display is within error limits. The colour representation gives no advantage for the evaluation of usual computer tomograms because the window technique enables a contrast representation in black-and-white too.</p>","PeriodicalId":77527,"journal":{"name":"Digitale Bilddiagnostik","volume":"7 3","pages":"151-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digitale Bilddiagnostik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different views about the value of a colour monitor for the evaluation of computer tomograms have prompted us to carry out this ROC (Receiver Operation Characteristic) examination. The latter was based on patient computer tomograms in which lesions of the liver were simulated by image manipulation. 5 radiologists analysed the image material (a) on a black-and-white monitor, (b) on a colour monitor, and (c) simultaneously on a black-and-white and a colour monitor. The study shows that the use of a colour monitor gives no essentially different result than evaluation with a black-and-white monitor. The slightly better result of 2% more true positive findings with simultaneous representation of black-and-white and colour image relative to the sole use of black-and-white display is within error limits. The colour representation gives no advantage for the evaluation of usual computer tomograms because the window technique enables a contrast representation in black-and-white too.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[使用黑白和彩色监视器的计算机断层扫描的评价:ROC(接受者操作特征)比较]。
关于彩色监视器对计算机断层图评价的价值的不同观点促使我们进行了这项ROC(接受者操作特征)检查。后者是基于病人的计算机断层扫描,其中肝脏病变是通过图像处理模拟的。5名放射科医生(a)在黑白显示器上分析图像材料,(b)在彩色显示器上分析,(c)同时在黑白和彩色显示器上分析。研究表明,使用彩色显示器的结果与使用黑白显示器的结果没有本质上的不同。与单独使用黑白显示器相比,同时显示黑白和彩色图像的结果比单独使用黑白显示器的结果高出2%,这一结果在误差范围内。彩色表示对于通常的计算机断层图像的评价没有任何优势,因为窗口技术也可以在黑白中进行对比度表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of the liver with Turbo FLASH]. [Origin and course of renal arteries. A CT study for determining optimal projection plane in renal artery angiography]. [Value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in diagnosis of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison with sonography, computerized tomography and angiography]. [Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS)]. [Digital sialography].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1