Neurotic depression accompanied by somatic symptoms: a double-blind comparison of flupenthixol and diazepam in general practice.

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
M Grillage
{"title":"Neurotic depression accompanied by somatic symptoms: a double-blind comparison of flupenthixol and diazepam in general practice.","authors":"M Grillage","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 192 patients suffering from mild to moderate depression, with or without anxiety, accompanied by one or more specific somatic symptoms, was entered into a double-blind, multi-centre trial to compare flupenthixol and diazepam as treatments for psychosomatic syndromes in general practice. Each patient was treated for 4 weeks and assessed after 1, 2 and 4 weeks on the Hamilton Depression Scale, with visual analogue scales of depression and somatic symptoms, by global assessments (psychological and somatic symptoms) and on a side-effects scale. The principal somatic symptoms were tension headache (69 patients), epigastric discomfort (59 patients), chest pain (39 patients) and backache (25 patients). There were 9 drop-outs (2 on flupenthixol and 7 on diazepam), of whom 5 (2 on flupenthixol and 3 on diazepam) who were treated for at least 2 weeks were included in the analysis of results. All patients received 1 tablet a day (0.5 mg flupenthixol or 2.5 mg diazepam) for the first week. Thereafter, all except 5 patients (3 on flupenthixol and 2 on diazepam) had their dose doubled for the remaining 3 weeks of study. Both drugs were effective in producing consistent improvement in all four somatic symptom groups in terms of both depression and somatic symptoms over the 4 weeks of study. There was a trend throughout in favour of flupenthixol as the more therapeutically effective. Flupenthixol was significantly more effective in relieving depressive symptoms and somatic symptoms in all four somatic symptom groups considered together. It was also superior to diazepam as measured by its effect on the depression sub-scales, anxiety, agitated depression, retarded depression and melancholia. Both drugs were well tolerated, although diazepam-treated patients showed a moderate increase in side-effects scores initially, while the scores in patients treated with flupenthixol decreased consistently over all 4 weeks of the trial. It is concluded from this study that flupenthixol has an important place in the management of patients with psychosomatic illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 9","pages":"561-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 192 patients suffering from mild to moderate depression, with or without anxiety, accompanied by one or more specific somatic symptoms, was entered into a double-blind, multi-centre trial to compare flupenthixol and diazepam as treatments for psychosomatic syndromes in general practice. Each patient was treated for 4 weeks and assessed after 1, 2 and 4 weeks on the Hamilton Depression Scale, with visual analogue scales of depression and somatic symptoms, by global assessments (psychological and somatic symptoms) and on a side-effects scale. The principal somatic symptoms were tension headache (69 patients), epigastric discomfort (59 patients), chest pain (39 patients) and backache (25 patients). There were 9 drop-outs (2 on flupenthixol and 7 on diazepam), of whom 5 (2 on flupenthixol and 3 on diazepam) who were treated for at least 2 weeks were included in the analysis of results. All patients received 1 tablet a day (0.5 mg flupenthixol or 2.5 mg diazepam) for the first week. Thereafter, all except 5 patients (3 on flupenthixol and 2 on diazepam) had their dose doubled for the remaining 3 weeks of study. Both drugs were effective in producing consistent improvement in all four somatic symptom groups in terms of both depression and somatic symptoms over the 4 weeks of study. There was a trend throughout in favour of flupenthixol as the more therapeutically effective. Flupenthixol was significantly more effective in relieving depressive symptoms and somatic symptoms in all four somatic symptom groups considered together. It was also superior to diazepam as measured by its effect on the depression sub-scales, anxiety, agitated depression, retarded depression and melancholia. Both drugs were well tolerated, although diazepam-treated patients showed a moderate increase in side-effects scores initially, while the scores in patients treated with flupenthixol decreased consistently over all 4 weeks of the trial. It is concluded from this study that flupenthixol has an important place in the management of patients with psychosomatic illness.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有躯体症状的神经性抑郁:氟哌噻醇和地西泮在一般实践中的双盲比较。
共有192名患有轻度至中度抑郁症、伴有或不伴有一种或多种特定躯体症状的患者参加了一项双盲、多中心试验,以比较氟哌噻醇和地西泮在一般实践中作为心身综合征的治疗方法。每位患者治疗4周,并在1周、2周和4周后用汉密尔顿抑郁量表、抑郁和躯体症状视觉模拟量表、整体评估(心理和躯体症状)和副作用量表进行评估。主要躯体症状为紧张性头痛(69例)、上腹部不适(59例)、胸痛(39例)和背痛(25例)。有9例退出组(氟哌辛醇组2例,地西泮组7例),其中治疗至少2周的5例(氟哌辛醇组2例,地西泮组3例)纳入结果分析。所有患者在第一周每天服用1片(0.5 mg氟哌辛醇或2.5 mg地西泮)。此后,除5名患者(3名氟哌噻醇组和2名地西泮组)外,其余3周的研究均加倍剂量。在4周的研究中,这两种药物对所有4个躯体症状组的抑郁和躯体症状都有持续的改善。在整个过程中,有一种倾向,认为氟苯噻醇在治疗上更有效。氟哌啶醇在缓解抑郁症状和躯体症状方面明显更有效,在所有四个躯体症状组一起考虑。在抑郁分量表、焦虑、躁动性抑郁、迟滞性抑郁和忧郁症的效果上也优于地西泮。两种药物的耐受性都很好,尽管地西泮治疗的患者最初的副作用评分适度增加,而氟苯硫醇治疗的患者的副作用评分在整个4周的试验中持续下降。本研究表明氟哌噻醇在心身疾病患者的治疗中具有重要的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flupenthixol and fluvoxamine in mild to moderate depression: a comparison in general practice. Treatment of chronic occlusive arterial disease with pentoxifylline: changes in clinical and haemodynamic parameters. Effects of penbutolol on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and antidiuretic hormone levels before and after exercise: a double-blind comparison against placebo. Absence of interaction between ramipril, a new ACE-inhibitor, and phenprocoumon, an anticoagulant agent. Zuclopenthixol and haloperidol/levomepromazine in the treatment of elderly patients with symptoms of aggressiveness and agitation: a double-blind, multi-centre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1