{"title":"Radiologic examination in gastric cancer. A retrospective study of 188 patients.","authors":"J O Barentsz, G R Rosenbusch, S P Strijk, S H Yap","doi":"10.1177/028418518602700511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accuracy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was investigated in 188 histologically proven cases, including 12 cases of early gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-five of 167 patients (99%) were recorded radiologically as having a gastric lesion. The initial diagnosis was carcinoma in 144 patients (86%), and benign lesion in 21 cases (13%). In 2 cases (1%) no abnormalities were seen. In 3 out of 9 patients with a partial gastrectomy (33%) an incorrect diagnosis was made. In 11 of 12 patients with early gastric cancer the radiologic examination revealed abnormal findings, but 7 of these were incorrectly interpreted as benign. A retrospective analysis of the radiologic examination in which no malignancies were reported showed that inadequacy of the examination technique and misinterpretation of radiologic signs of malignancy were the main causes of failure in diagnosing of malignancy. The rate of misinterpretation of malignancy as a benign lesion (13%) justifies the endoscopic control of every radiologically detected abnormality. The high sensitivity in detecting a lesion indicates, however, that a biphasic radiologic examination is a safe screening method in gastric cancer. Endoscopy with biopsy showed a lesion in 156 out of 160 patients (98%), but in 11 of these (7%) the initial examination did not yield histologic proof of malignancy. In 4 patients (2%) no abnormalities were observed by endoscopists. One hundred and forty-nine patients were examined with both radiology and endoscopy with biopsy. A malignant lesion with recognition of its malignant character was defined in 144 cases (97%).</p>","PeriodicalId":7142,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","volume":"27 5","pages":"547-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700511","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The accuracy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was investigated in 188 histologically proven cases, including 12 cases of early gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-five of 167 patients (99%) were recorded radiologically as having a gastric lesion. The initial diagnosis was carcinoma in 144 patients (86%), and benign lesion in 21 cases (13%). In 2 cases (1%) no abnormalities were seen. In 3 out of 9 patients with a partial gastrectomy (33%) an incorrect diagnosis was made. In 11 of 12 patients with early gastric cancer the radiologic examination revealed abnormal findings, but 7 of these were incorrectly interpreted as benign. A retrospective analysis of the radiologic examination in which no malignancies were reported showed that inadequacy of the examination technique and misinterpretation of radiologic signs of malignancy were the main causes of failure in diagnosing of malignancy. The rate of misinterpretation of malignancy as a benign lesion (13%) justifies the endoscopic control of every radiologically detected abnormality. The high sensitivity in detecting a lesion indicates, however, that a biphasic radiologic examination is a safe screening method in gastric cancer. Endoscopy with biopsy showed a lesion in 156 out of 160 patients (98%), but in 11 of these (7%) the initial examination did not yield histologic proof of malignancy. In 4 patients (2%) no abnormalities were observed by endoscopists. One hundred and forty-nine patients were examined with both radiology and endoscopy with biopsy. A malignant lesion with recognition of its malignant character was defined in 144 cases (97%).