Radiologic examination in gastric cancer. A retrospective study of 188 patients.

J O Barentsz, G R Rosenbusch, S P Strijk, S H Yap
{"title":"Radiologic examination in gastric cancer. A retrospective study of 188 patients.","authors":"J O Barentsz,&nbsp;G R Rosenbusch,&nbsp;S P Strijk,&nbsp;S H Yap","doi":"10.1177/028418518602700511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The accuracy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was investigated in 188 histologically proven cases, including 12 cases of early gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-five of 167 patients (99%) were recorded radiologically as having a gastric lesion. The initial diagnosis was carcinoma in 144 patients (86%), and benign lesion in 21 cases (13%). In 2 cases (1%) no abnormalities were seen. In 3 out of 9 patients with a partial gastrectomy (33%) an incorrect diagnosis was made. In 11 of 12 patients with early gastric cancer the radiologic examination revealed abnormal findings, but 7 of these were incorrectly interpreted as benign. A retrospective analysis of the radiologic examination in which no malignancies were reported showed that inadequacy of the examination technique and misinterpretation of radiologic signs of malignancy were the main causes of failure in diagnosing of malignancy. The rate of misinterpretation of malignancy as a benign lesion (13%) justifies the endoscopic control of every radiologically detected abnormality. The high sensitivity in detecting a lesion indicates, however, that a biphasic radiologic examination is a safe screening method in gastric cancer. Endoscopy with biopsy showed a lesion in 156 out of 160 patients (98%), but in 11 of these (7%) the initial examination did not yield histologic proof of malignancy. In 4 patients (2%) no abnormalities were observed by endoscopists. One hundred and forty-nine patients were examined with both radiology and endoscopy with biopsy. A malignant lesion with recognition of its malignant character was defined in 144 cases (97%).</p>","PeriodicalId":7142,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","volume":"27 5","pages":"547-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700511","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The accuracy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was investigated in 188 histologically proven cases, including 12 cases of early gastric cancer. One hundred and sixty-five of 167 patients (99%) were recorded radiologically as having a gastric lesion. The initial diagnosis was carcinoma in 144 patients (86%), and benign lesion in 21 cases (13%). In 2 cases (1%) no abnormalities were seen. In 3 out of 9 patients with a partial gastrectomy (33%) an incorrect diagnosis was made. In 11 of 12 patients with early gastric cancer the radiologic examination revealed abnormal findings, but 7 of these were incorrectly interpreted as benign. A retrospective analysis of the radiologic examination in which no malignancies were reported showed that inadequacy of the examination technique and misinterpretation of radiologic signs of malignancy were the main causes of failure in diagnosing of malignancy. The rate of misinterpretation of malignancy as a benign lesion (13%) justifies the endoscopic control of every radiologically detected abnormality. The high sensitivity in detecting a lesion indicates, however, that a biphasic radiologic examination is a safe screening method in gastric cancer. Endoscopy with biopsy showed a lesion in 156 out of 160 patients (98%), but in 11 of these (7%) the initial examination did not yield histologic proof of malignancy. In 4 patients (2%) no abnormalities were observed by endoscopists. One hundred and forty-nine patients were examined with both radiology and endoscopy with biopsy. A malignant lesion with recognition of its malignant character was defined in 144 cases (97%).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃癌的影像学检查。188例患者的回顾性研究。
本文对188例经组织学证实的胃癌病例(其中12例为早期胃癌)的诊断准确性进行了研究。167例患者中有165例(99%)放射学记录为胃病变。最初诊断为癌144例(86%),良性病变21例(13%)。2例(1%)未见异常。9例胃部分切除术患者中有3例(33%)诊断错误。在12例早期胃癌患者中,11例放射学检查显示异常,但其中7例被错误地解释为良性。回顾性分析无恶性肿瘤报告的放射学检查表明,检查技术的不足和对恶性肿瘤放射学征象的误解是恶性肿瘤诊断失败的主要原因。恶性肿瘤被误读为良性病变的比率(13%)证明内镜下控制每一个放射学检测到的异常是合理的。然而,检测病变的高灵敏度表明,双期放射检查是一种安全的胃癌筛查方法。160例患者中有156例(98%)的活检显示病变,但其中11例(7%)的初步检查未发现恶性肿瘤的组织学证据。4例患者(2%)内镜检查未见异常。149例患者进行了放射学和内镜活检检查。144例(97%)确诊为恶性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Importance Du Volume Irradié Et Notion De Dose Dans Le Traitement Post-Opératoire Des Tumeurs Cérébrales Treatment of Neuroblastoma RADIATION LOAD TO THE GONADS IN DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURES Effect of Cyclophosphamide on Pain in Advanced Carcinoma of the Cervix Cesium 137 Burdens in the Canadian North
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1