Two years clinical experience with continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in acute renal failure.

D T Domoto
{"title":"Two years clinical experience with continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in acute renal failure.","authors":"D T Domoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clotting of hemofilters is the most frequent single cause of filter failure. These filters frequently clot in spite of acceptable hemodynamic and anticoagulation parameters. Sixty percent of filters which eventually clotted never filtered above 200 ml/hr. In our experience maximum ultrafiltration rates of 500 ml/hr to over 1000 ml/hr are rarely achieved in routine clinical usage. Finally, a disproportionate number of filters accessed to the lower leg either clotted or were discontinued for subsequent dialysis. Thus, we conclude that lower leg accesses should be avoided if possible. Further, to prevent clotting, in addition to maintaining adequate anticoagulation and cardiac output, maximum ultrafiltration rates should be sought. To achieve maximum ultrafiltration rates, a good vascular access is primary. Also, a vacuum system may be needed and perhaps routinely used to obtain filtration rates near 500 ml/hr. These high filtration rates will also reduce the need for hemodialysis, the second most common reason for filter discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23160,"journal":{"name":"Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs","volume":"31 ","pages":"581-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clotting of hemofilters is the most frequent single cause of filter failure. These filters frequently clot in spite of acceptable hemodynamic and anticoagulation parameters. Sixty percent of filters which eventually clotted never filtered above 200 ml/hr. In our experience maximum ultrafiltration rates of 500 ml/hr to over 1000 ml/hr are rarely achieved in routine clinical usage. Finally, a disproportionate number of filters accessed to the lower leg either clotted or were discontinued for subsequent dialysis. Thus, we conclude that lower leg accesses should be avoided if possible. Further, to prevent clotting, in addition to maintaining adequate anticoagulation and cardiac output, maximum ultrafiltration rates should be sought. To achieve maximum ultrafiltration rates, a good vascular access is primary. Also, a vacuum system may be needed and perhaps routinely used to obtain filtration rates near 500 ml/hr. These high filtration rates will also reduce the need for hemodialysis, the second most common reason for filter discontinuation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二年持续动静脉血液滤过治疗急性肾功能衰竭的临床经验。
血液滤过器凝血是滤过器失效最常见的单一原因。尽管血液动力学和抗凝参数是可以接受的,但这些过滤器经常会凝结。60%最终凝结的过滤器从未过滤超过200毫升/小时。根据我们的经验,在常规临床使用中,500毫升/小时至1000毫升/小时以上的最大超滤速率很少实现。最后,进入下肢的滤过器数量不成比例地凝结或停止进行后续透析。因此,我们的结论是,如果可能的话,应避免下肢通路。此外,为了防止凝血,除了维持足够的抗凝和心输出量外,还应寻求最大的超滤率。为了达到最大的超滤率,良好的血管通道是首要的。此外,可能需要真空系统,并且可能常规使用以获得接近500ml /hr的过滤速率。这些高滤过率也将减少对血液透析的需求,这是过滤器停止使用的第二大常见原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of occlusive inlet pannus formation: comparison of conduit designs. Automatic priming, blood flow control, and rinsing during single access hemodialysis: the BioLogic-HD. Reduction in peritonitis frequency by the Dupont Sterile Connection Device. Zirconium does not produce osteomalacia in rats with chronic renal failure. Pathologic findings and their implications in patients managed with temporary ventricular assist.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1