Mechanistic aspects of initiation and promotion in C3H/10T1/2 cells.

C J Boreiko
{"title":"Mechanistic aspects of initiation and promotion in C3H/10T1/2 cells.","authors":"C J Boreiko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transformation of C3H/10T1/2 cells can be made to proceed through discrete stages of initiation and promotion. Studies of the effect of cell density upon focus formation in cultures treated with MNNG and TPA suggest that initiation by MNNG is due to a relatively infrequent, irreversible event induced by a single carcinogen treatment. In contrast, promotion appears to be a reversible process requiring multiple treatments with TPA over a protracted period of time. Some evidence suggests that promotion may entail the induction of phenotypic changes which impart a growth advantage to phenotypically unstable \"initiated\" cell populations. The actual cellular mechanism(s) for most of the phenomena observed in C3H/10T1/2 cultures have eluded precise definition and widely divergent hypotheses have been advanced to explain transformation, initiation, and promotion. Conceivably there are multiple mechanisms responsible for each of these phenomenon. Some agents may transform by a multistage mechanism whereas others may exert their effects in a more direct fashion. Some of the foci produced by promotion may be the result of simple selective processes, others the product of more complex inductive events. Variations would thus be expected between laboratories working with different protocols and agents. As demonstrated by the possible involvement of an MCA residue in transformation, it is also apparent that fundamental technical aspects of this conceptually simple cell transformation system are poorly understood. While it is natural to develop mechanistic models based on quantitative observations of transformation, a limited understanding of the basic cell culture variables which modulate both the induction and expression of transformation dictate that caution be exercised in extrapolating the significance of such models to in vivo carcinogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":77688,"journal":{"name":"Carcinogenesis; a comprehensive survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carcinogenesis; a comprehensive survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transformation of C3H/10T1/2 cells can be made to proceed through discrete stages of initiation and promotion. Studies of the effect of cell density upon focus formation in cultures treated with MNNG and TPA suggest that initiation by MNNG is due to a relatively infrequent, irreversible event induced by a single carcinogen treatment. In contrast, promotion appears to be a reversible process requiring multiple treatments with TPA over a protracted period of time. Some evidence suggests that promotion may entail the induction of phenotypic changes which impart a growth advantage to phenotypically unstable "initiated" cell populations. The actual cellular mechanism(s) for most of the phenomena observed in C3H/10T1/2 cultures have eluded precise definition and widely divergent hypotheses have been advanced to explain transformation, initiation, and promotion. Conceivably there are multiple mechanisms responsible for each of these phenomenon. Some agents may transform by a multistage mechanism whereas others may exert their effects in a more direct fashion. Some of the foci produced by promotion may be the result of simple selective processes, others the product of more complex inductive events. Variations would thus be expected between laboratories working with different protocols and agents. As demonstrated by the possible involvement of an MCA residue in transformation, it is also apparent that fundamental technical aspects of this conceptually simple cell transformation system are poorly understood. While it is natural to develop mechanistic models based on quantitative observations of transformation, a limited understanding of the basic cell culture variables which modulate both the induction and expression of transformation dictate that caution be exercised in extrapolating the significance of such models to in vivo carcinogenesis.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C3H/10T1/2细胞起始和促进的机制方面。
C3H/10T1/2细胞的转化可以通过起始和促进的离散阶段进行。在MNNG和TPA处理的培养物中,细胞密度对病灶形成的影响的研究表明,MNNG的起始是由于单一致癌物治疗诱导的相对罕见的、不可逆的事件。相反,促进似乎是一个可逆的过程,需要在很长一段时间内用TPA进行多次治疗。一些证据表明,促进可能需要诱导表型变化,从而赋予表型不稳定的“初始”细胞群体生长优势。在C3H/10T1/2培养中观察到的大多数现象的实际细胞机制尚未得到精确的定义,并且提出了广泛不同的假设来解释转化,起始和促进。可以想象,每种现象都有多种机制。有些药剂可能通过多阶段机制转化,而另一些药剂可能以更直接的方式发挥作用。一些由促进产生的焦点可能是简单的选择过程的结果,另一些则是更复杂的归纳事件的产物。因此,在使用不同方案和药剂的实验室之间,预计会有差异。正如MCA残基可能参与转化所证明的那样,很明显,这种概念上简单的细胞转化系统的基本技术方面理解得很差。虽然建立基于转化定量观察的机制模型是很自然的,但对调节转化诱导和表达的基本细胞培养变量的有限理解表明,在推断这些模型对体内癌变的意义时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The premalignant nature of mouse skin papillomas: histopathologic, cytogenetic, and biochemical evidence. Keratin expression in mouse epidermal tumors. Genetic background and development of skin tumors. Development of murine skin neoplasia studied with enzymes used as cell markers. The action of oncogenes and growth factors in tumour initiation and promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1