Review of clinical results of fast neutron therapy in the USA.

Strahlentherapie Pub Date : 1985-12-01
L J Peters, M H Maor, G E Laramore, T W Griffin, F R Hendrickson
{"title":"Review of clinical results of fast neutron therapy in the USA.","authors":"L J Peters,&nbsp;M H Maor,&nbsp;G E Laramore,&nbsp;T W Griffin,&nbsp;F R Hendrickson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fast neutron radiotherapy in the United States is entering a new era in which dedicated hospital-based generators with isocentric beam capability are replacing treatment facilities based on fixed beams extracted from physics accelerators. All available clinical data, however, come from the older facilities. The majority of randomized trials conducted in the U.S. have used neutrons in a mixed schedule with photons, in which the aim was to deliver two-fifths of the total dose with neutrons; the neutron dose per fraction was set as the estimated equivalent of 2 Gy photons in terms of late normal tissue injury. Overall treatment time was held constant compared with the control photon therapy regimens (usually six to eight weeks). Random studies of this type showed no evidence of a therapeutic gain in the treatment of advanced primary carcinomas of the head and neck, lung, uterine cervix, or pancreas. A statistically significant benefit in favor of the mixed schedule is presently apparent for local control and survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer, and for clearance of neck nodes in patients with advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Based on encouraging results in a pilot study of mixed scheduled irradiation preoperatively for bladder cancer, a random study was begun in 1981, but too few cases have been accrued for analysis. Other randomized trials comparing protracted neutron only regimens with photon therapy have been conducted. These were negative for lung and pancreatic cancer, but a suggestion of a therapeutic gain (with small patient numbers) has been observed for treatment of inoperable salivary gland tumors and advanced squamous carcinomas of the head and neck. Two large randomized studies of various neutron doses delivered as a boost to high grade astrocytomas after or concurrently with photon irradiation have failed to define any therapeutic window between tumor destruction and brain necrosis. Based on a reassessment of all the available clinical and radiobiological data, and taking advantage of the greater technical flexibility offered by hospital-based facilities, the strategy of fast neutron therapy for future trials has been changed. In these trials neutrons are being used in a twelve fraction, four week regimen to treat gross disease, with elective therapy being given wherever possible using low LET irradiation. Concomitantly, research is proceeding to define predictors of tumor response to high LET radiations in order to better select patients for fast neutron radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21981,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie","volume":"161 12","pages":"731-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fast neutron radiotherapy in the United States is entering a new era in which dedicated hospital-based generators with isocentric beam capability are replacing treatment facilities based on fixed beams extracted from physics accelerators. All available clinical data, however, come from the older facilities. The majority of randomized trials conducted in the U.S. have used neutrons in a mixed schedule with photons, in which the aim was to deliver two-fifths of the total dose with neutrons; the neutron dose per fraction was set as the estimated equivalent of 2 Gy photons in terms of late normal tissue injury. Overall treatment time was held constant compared with the control photon therapy regimens (usually six to eight weeks). Random studies of this type showed no evidence of a therapeutic gain in the treatment of advanced primary carcinomas of the head and neck, lung, uterine cervix, or pancreas. A statistically significant benefit in favor of the mixed schedule is presently apparent for local control and survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer, and for clearance of neck nodes in patients with advanced squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Based on encouraging results in a pilot study of mixed scheduled irradiation preoperatively for bladder cancer, a random study was begun in 1981, but too few cases have been accrued for analysis. Other randomized trials comparing protracted neutron only regimens with photon therapy have been conducted. These were negative for lung and pancreatic cancer, but a suggestion of a therapeutic gain (with small patient numbers) has been observed for treatment of inoperable salivary gland tumors and advanced squamous carcinomas of the head and neck. Two large randomized studies of various neutron doses delivered as a boost to high grade astrocytomas after or concurrently with photon irradiation have failed to define any therapeutic window between tumor destruction and brain necrosis. Based on a reassessment of all the available clinical and radiobiological data, and taking advantage of the greater technical flexibility offered by hospital-based facilities, the strategy of fast neutron therapy for future trials has been changed. In these trials neutrons are being used in a twelve fraction, four week regimen to treat gross disease, with elective therapy being given wherever possible using low LET irradiation. Concomitantly, research is proceeding to define predictors of tumor response to high LET radiations in order to better select patients for fast neutron radiotherapy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国快中子治疗的临床结果综述。
美国的快中子放射治疗正在进入一个新的时代,在这个时代,具有等心束能力的专用医院发生器正在取代基于从物理加速器提取的固定光束的治疗设施。然而,所有可用的临床数据都来自较老的机构。在美国进行的大多数随机试验都将中子与光子混合使用,目的是用中子提供总剂量的五分之二;每个分数的中子剂量设为正常组织损伤晚期2 Gy光子的估计当量。与对照光子治疗方案(通常为6至8周)相比,总体治疗时间保持不变。这种类型的随机研究显示,在头颈部、肺部、子宫颈或胰腺的晚期原发性癌的治疗中,没有证据表明有治疗增益。目前,对于晚期前列腺癌患者的局部控制和生存,以及晚期头颈部鳞状癌患者的颈部淋巴结清除,混合方案的统计学显著益处是显而易见的。基于膀胱癌术前混合计划照射的初步研究的令人鼓舞的结果,1981年开始了一项随机研究,但积累的病例太少,无法进行分析。其他随机试验也比较了光子治疗和长期中子治疗方案。对肺癌和胰腺癌均阴性,但对不能手术的唾液腺肿瘤和晚期头颈部鳞状癌的治疗(患者数量较少)有治疗效果。两项大型随机研究在光子照射后或同时给予不同剂量的中子以促进高级别星形细胞瘤,但未能确定肿瘤破坏和脑坏死之间的任何治疗窗口。基于对所有现有临床和放射生物学数据的重新评估,并利用医院设施提供的更大的技术灵活性,对未来试验的快中子治疗策略进行了改变。在这些试验中,中子被用于12分,4周的治疗方案,以治疗严重疾病,并在可能的情况下使用低LET照射进行选择性治疗。同时,研究正在进行中,以确定肿瘤对高LET辐射反应的预测因素,以便更好地选择患者进行快中子放疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proton therapy at Harvard. Proton radiotherapy with the Uppsala cyclotron. Experience and plans. Neutron radiobiology and clinical consequences. Review and evolution of clinical results in the EORTC Heavy-Particle Therapy Group. Results of curative pion therapy at SIN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1