How (Un-)Healthy are Austrian school food environments? Evidence from focus groups and citizen science

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Appetite Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2023.106636
Sascha Gell, Emina Pejkovic, Raffael Heiss
{"title":"How (Un-)Healthy are Austrian school food environments? Evidence from focus groups and citizen science","authors":"Sascha Gell,&nbsp;Emina Pejkovic,&nbsp;Raffael Heiss","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2023.106636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adolescents face high-choice school food environments that offer plenty of highly processed foods. Processed food producers target young people in their marketing, but there is limited data on the actual food supply inside and in the vicinity of Austrian schools and its impact on adolescent food choices. This study employs an innovative mixed-methods approach to explore adolescents' food choices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In Study 1, we conducted a citizen science study, with students as volunteer scientists. The students examined the food supply in and around their schools according to the Austrian food pyramid and categorized 953 food items in 144 food suppliers using photographs and descriptions. In Study 2, we explored students' food preferences in focus groups. We conducted four focus groups at four different schools in Tyrol, with 25 students (11 male, 14 female) between the ages of 12 and 15. We then linked the findings on individual preferences with the documented supply.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study 1 found that the food supply in the investigated schools was predominantly categorized as unhealthy. The students categorized 46% as “unhealthy”, 32% as “intermediate”, and only 22% as “healthy”. Study 2 identified three influential factors in students' food choices: 1) individual factors (such as taste and preferences), 2) social factors (such as mingling with peers), and 3) structural factors (such as physical environment and accessibility).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study shows that unhealthy products cater to unhealthy preferences among adolescents and dominate current school food environments. Policies need to address unhealthy school food environments to tackle this issue. Food supplies should be presented in an attractive ways, in fun places where students can mingle and express their identities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 106636"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666323006992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adolescents face high-choice school food environments that offer plenty of highly processed foods. Processed food producers target young people in their marketing, but there is limited data on the actual food supply inside and in the vicinity of Austrian schools and its impact on adolescent food choices. This study employs an innovative mixed-methods approach to explore adolescents' food choices.

Methods

In Study 1, we conducted a citizen science study, with students as volunteer scientists. The students examined the food supply in and around their schools according to the Austrian food pyramid and categorized 953 food items in 144 food suppliers using photographs and descriptions. In Study 2, we explored students' food preferences in focus groups. We conducted four focus groups at four different schools in Tyrol, with 25 students (11 male, 14 female) between the ages of 12 and 15. We then linked the findings on individual preferences with the documented supply.

Results

Study 1 found that the food supply in the investigated schools was predominantly categorized as unhealthy. The students categorized 46% as “unhealthy”, 32% as “intermediate”, and only 22% as “healthy”. Study 2 identified three influential factors in students' food choices: 1) individual factors (such as taste and preferences), 2) social factors (such as mingling with peers), and 3) structural factors (such as physical environment and accessibility).

Conclusion

The study shows that unhealthy products cater to unhealthy preferences among adolescents and dominate current school food environments. Policies need to address unhealthy school food environments to tackle this issue. Food supplies should be presented in an attractive ways, in fun places where students can mingle and express their identities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥地利学校的饮食环境有多(不)健康?来自焦点小组和公民科学的证据
青少年面临着提供大量高度加工食品的高选择学校食品环境。加工食品生产商的营销目标是年轻人,但关于奥地利学校内部和附近的实际食品供应及其对青少年食品选择的影响的数据有限。本研究采用一种创新的混合方法来探讨青少年的食物选择。在研究1中,我们进行了一项公民科学研究,学生作为志愿者科学家。学生们根据奥地利食物金字塔检查了学校内部和周围的食物供应,并使用照片和描述对144家食物供应商的953种食物进行了分类。在研究2中,我们在焦点小组中探讨了学生的食物偏好。我们在蒂罗尔的四所不同的学校进行了四个焦点小组,有25名年龄在12至15岁之间的学生(11名男性,14名女性)。然后,我们将个人偏好的发现与记录的供应联系起来。结果研究1发现,被调查学校的食品供应以不健康食品为主。学生们将46%归为“不健康”,32%归为“中等”,只有22%归为“健康”。研究2确定了影响学生食物选择的三个因素:1)个人因素(如口味和偏好),2)社会因素(如与同龄人的交往),3)结构因素(如物理环境和可及性)。结论不健康食品迎合了青少年的不健康偏好,主导了当前的学校食品环境。政策需要解决不健康的学校食品环境,以解决这一问题。食品供应应该以一种吸引人的方式呈现,在有趣的地方,学生可以交流和表达他们的身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
期刊最新文献
Does Rejection of Inequality Encourage Green Consumption? The Effect of Power Distance Belief on Organic Food Consumption. "Flavor, fun, and vitamins"? Consumers' Lay Beliefs About Child-Oriented Food Products. Food rejection is associated with tactile sensitivity and tactile appreciation in three-year-old children. The effect of Position and Availability interventions on adolescents' food choice: An online experimental study. Association of Maternal Immigration Status with Emotional Eating in Taiwanese Children: The Mediating Roles of Health Literacy and Feeding Practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1