Neuropharmacology of earthworm giant fibers

James E.P. Toman, Hector C. Sabelli
{"title":"Neuropharmacology of earthworm giant fibers","authors":"James E.P. Toman,&nbsp;Hector C. Sabelli","doi":"10.1016/0028-3908(68)90066-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of a variety of neurotropic drugs on excitability and action potential form of the giant nerve fibers of the earthworm ventral cord were studied with external electrodes.</p><p>Earthworm giant fibers were like frog sciatic myelinated fibers in the types of changes induced by most drugs tested, the worm fibers being generally more sensitive. Many centrally active drugs, such as chlordiazepoxide, LSD and methamphetamine, resembled local anesthetics in causing conduction block by increased threshold; unlike procaine, the threshold elevation caused by the above drugs could not be restored transiently toward normal by repetitive maximal stimulation. With most imipraminics, phenothiazines and related agents the mechanism of conduction block did not seem to depend on threshold increase.</p><p>Earthworm fibers differed from frog sciatic in several respects: they were not made hyper-excitable by calcium depletion; they showed repetitive firing with high concentration of calcium (the repetitive firing could be antagonized by barbital and trimethadione, not by bromide or diphenylhydantoin); they showed transient lowering of threshold by cholinesterase inhibitors; catelectrotonic repetitive firing could be blocked byd-tubocurarine. Some of the above findings suggest that N-cholinergic receptors may function in earthworm but not in frog myelinated fibers.</p><p>The following relationships held true over a wide range of variation of nerve properties by drugs and physiological maneuvers. The ratio of spike voltage when at maximum rate of activation to the maximum spike voltage itself remained relatively constant (0·7 approximately): spike amplitude was modifiable independently of threshold or maximum rate of activation; usually there was an inverse relation between threshold and maximum rate of activation, the only notable exception being initial threshold-lowering action of typical depolarizing monovalent cations (K, Rb, Cs).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14111,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neuropharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0028-3908(68)90066-X","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002839086890066X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The effects of a variety of neurotropic drugs on excitability and action potential form of the giant nerve fibers of the earthworm ventral cord were studied with external electrodes.

Earthworm giant fibers were like frog sciatic myelinated fibers in the types of changes induced by most drugs tested, the worm fibers being generally more sensitive. Many centrally active drugs, such as chlordiazepoxide, LSD and methamphetamine, resembled local anesthetics in causing conduction block by increased threshold; unlike procaine, the threshold elevation caused by the above drugs could not be restored transiently toward normal by repetitive maximal stimulation. With most imipraminics, phenothiazines and related agents the mechanism of conduction block did not seem to depend on threshold increase.

Earthworm fibers differed from frog sciatic in several respects: they were not made hyper-excitable by calcium depletion; they showed repetitive firing with high concentration of calcium (the repetitive firing could be antagonized by barbital and trimethadione, not by bromide or diphenylhydantoin); they showed transient lowering of threshold by cholinesterase inhibitors; catelectrotonic repetitive firing could be blocked byd-tubocurarine. Some of the above findings suggest that N-cholinergic receptors may function in earthworm but not in frog myelinated fibers.

The following relationships held true over a wide range of variation of nerve properties by drugs and physiological maneuvers. The ratio of spike voltage when at maximum rate of activation to the maximum spike voltage itself remained relatively constant (0·7 approximately): spike amplitude was modifiable independently of threshold or maximum rate of activation; usually there was an inverse relation between threshold and maximum rate of activation, the only notable exception being initial threshold-lowering action of typical depolarizing monovalent cations (K, Rb, Cs).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚯蚓巨纤维的神经药理学
采用外电极法研究了多种促神经药物对蚯蚓腹索巨神经纤维兴奋性和动作电位形态的影响。蚯蚓的巨纤维与蛙的坐骨髓鞘纤维在大多数药物引起的变化类型相似,蚯蚓纤维一般更敏感。许多中枢活性药物,如氯二氮环氧化物、LSD和甲基苯丙胺,通过提高阈值引起传导阻滞,类似于局麻药;与普鲁卡因不同,上述药物引起的阈值升高不能通过反复的最大刺激暂时恢复到正常水平。对于大多数丙咪嗪类药物,吩噻嗪类药物和相关药物,传导阻滞的机制似乎不依赖于阈值的增加。蚯蚓的纤维在几个方面与青蛙的坐骨神经不同:它们不会因钙缺乏而过度兴奋;它们在高浓度钙的作用下表现为重复放电(这种重复放电可以被巴比妥和三甲美二酮拮抗,而不能被溴化剂或二苯基氢妥英拮抗);胆碱酯酶抑制剂可短暂降低阈值;Catelectrotonic重复性放电可被管碱阻断。上述一些发现表明,n -胆碱能受体可能在蚯蚓中起作用,而在青蛙的髓鞘纤维中不起作用。以下关系适用于药物和生理操作引起的神经特性的大范围变化。在最大激活率下的峰值电压与峰值电压本身的比值保持相对恒定(约为0.7):峰值振幅的改变与阈值或最大激活率无关;通常阈值与最大激活率呈反比关系,唯一值得注意的例外是典型的去极化单价阳离子(K, Rb, Cs)的初始阈值降低作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental alteration of tryptophan metabolism by methionine: Neuropharmacologic implications Noradrenaline sensitive cells in cat cerebral cortex Alteration of centrally mediated cardiovascular manifestations by intraventricular pronethalol and phentolamine Evidence for biogenic amine receptors in toad sciatic nerves Comparative study of the actions of nicotine and succinylcholine on the monosynaptic reflex and spindle afferent activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1