Analysis of total microcystins and nodularins by oxidative cleavage of their ADMAdda, DMAdda, and Adda moieties

IF 2.5 Q1 Chemistry Analytica Chimica Acta: X Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060
Amanda J. Foss , Christopher O. Miles , Alistair L. Wilkins , Frode Rise , Kristian W. Trovik , Kamil Cieslik , Mark T. Aubel
{"title":"Analysis of total microcystins and nodularins by oxidative cleavage of their ADMAdda, DMAdda, and Adda moieties","authors":"Amanda J. Foss ,&nbsp;Christopher O. Miles ,&nbsp;Alistair L. Wilkins ,&nbsp;Frode Rise ,&nbsp;Kristian W. Trovik ,&nbsp;Kamil Cieslik ,&nbsp;Mark T. Aubel","doi":"10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microcystins (MCs) and nodularins (NODs) exhibit high structural variability, including modifications of the Adda (3<em>S</em>-amino-9<em>S</em>-methoxy-2<em>S</em>,6,8<em>S</em>-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4<em>E</em>,6<em>E</em>-dienoic acid) moiety. Variations include 9-<em>O</em>-desmethylAdda (DMAdda) and 9-<em>O</em>-acetylDMAdda (ADMAdda) which, unless targeted, may go undetected. Therefore, reference standards were prepared of [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs and [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MCs, which were analyzed using multiple approaches. The cross-reactivities of the [DMAdda<sup>5</sup>]- and [ADMAdda<sup>5</sup>]MC standards were similar to that of MC-LR when analyzed with a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition assay, but were &lt;0.25% when analyzed with an Adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oxidative cleavage experiments identified compounds that could be used in the analysis of total MCs/NODs in a similar fashion to the 2<em>R</em>-methyl-3<em>S</em>-methoxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MMPB) technique. Products from oxidative cleavage of both the 4,5- and 6,7-ene of Adda, DMAdda and ADMAdda were observed, and three oxidation products, one from each Adda variant, were chosen for analysis and applied to three field samples and a <em>Nostoc</em> culture. Results from the oxidative cleavage method for total Adda, DMAdda, and ADMAdda were similar to those from the Adda-ELISA, PP2A inhibition, and LC-MS/MS analyses, except for the <em>Nostoc</em> culture where the Adda-ELISA greatly underestimated microcystin levels. This oxidative cleavage method can be used for routine analysis of field samples and to assess the presence of the rarely reported, but toxic, DMAdda/ADMAdda-containing MCs and NODs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":241,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta: X","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100060","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590134620300220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Microcystins (MCs) and nodularins (NODs) exhibit high structural variability, including modifications of the Adda (3S-amino-9S-methoxy-2S,6,8S-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4E,6E-dienoic acid) moiety. Variations include 9-O-desmethylAdda (DMAdda) and 9-O-acetylDMAdda (ADMAdda) which, unless targeted, may go undetected. Therefore, reference standards were prepared of [ADMAdda5]MCs and [DMAdda5]MCs, which were analyzed using multiple approaches. The cross-reactivities of the [DMAdda5]- and [ADMAdda5]MC standards were similar to that of MC-LR when analyzed with a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibition assay, but were <0.25% when analyzed with an Adda enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Oxidative cleavage experiments identified compounds that could be used in the analysis of total MCs/NODs in a similar fashion to the 2R-methyl-3S-methoxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MMPB) technique. Products from oxidative cleavage of both the 4,5- and 6,7-ene of Adda, DMAdda and ADMAdda were observed, and three oxidation products, one from each Adda variant, were chosen for analysis and applied to three field samples and a Nostoc culture. Results from the oxidative cleavage method for total Adda, DMAdda, and ADMAdda were similar to those from the Adda-ELISA, PP2A inhibition, and LC-MS/MS analyses, except for the Nostoc culture where the Adda-ELISA greatly underestimated microcystin levels. This oxidative cleavage method can be used for routine analysis of field samples and to assess the presence of the rarely reported, but toxic, DMAdda/ADMAdda-containing MCs and NODs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氧化裂解ADMAdda、dadda和Adda片段分析总微囊藻毒素和结核素
微囊藻毒素(MCs)和结节蛋白(NODs)具有高度的结构变变性,包括Adda (3s -氨基- 9s -甲氧基- 2s, 6,8s -三甲基-10-苯基十二- 4e, 6e -二烯酸)片段的修饰。变异包括9- o -去甲基adda (DMAdda)和9- o -乙酰基DMAdda (ADMAdda),除非靶向,否则可能无法检测到。为此,制备了[adadda5]和[DMAdda5]MCs的参比标准,并采用多种方法对其进行分析。用蛋白磷酸酶2A (PP2A)抑制试验分析,[DMAdda5]-和[adadda5]MC标准物的交叉反应性与MC- lr相似,但用Adda酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)分析时,交叉反应性为<0.25%。氧化裂解实验确定了可用于总MCs/NODs分析的化合物,类似于2r -甲基- 3s -甲氧基-4-苯基丁酸(MMPB)技术。对Adda、DMAdda和ADMAdda的4,5-和6,7-烯氧化裂解产物进行了观察,并从每个Adda变体中选择了三个氧化产物进行分析,并应用于三个现场样品和Nostoc培养。氧化裂解法测定总Adda、DMAdda和ADMAdda的结果与Adda- elisa、PP2A抑制和LC-MS/MS分析的结果相似,除了在Nostoc培养中,Adda- elisa大大低估了微囊藻毒素的水平。这种氧化裂解方法可以用于野外样品的常规分析,并评估很少报道但有毒的含有DMAdda/ adadda的mc和nod的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta: X
Analytica Chimica Acta: X Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Outside Front Cover Reconciling the pHe measurements of bioethanol: pHabs measurements of buffered 50-50 wt% water-ethanol mixtures Outside Front Cover Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1