Low back pain and its treatment by spinal manipulation: measures of flexibility and asymmetry.

F K Hoehler, J S Tobis
{"title":"Low back pain and its treatment by spinal manipulation: measures of flexibility and asymmetry.","authors":"F K Hoehler,&nbsp;J S Tobis","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/21.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nineteen low back pain patients and eight patients not suffering from low back pain were given several tests of flexibility and asymmetry by two different examiners. Three criteria of reliability and validity were used: (1) significant agreement between independent observers, (2) significantly different scores in the groups with and without low back pain, and (3) significant improvement following a successful spinal manipulation. Tests of anterior flexion and asymmetry of foot eversion met only the first and second criteria while tests of hamstring tightness and asymmetry of voluntary straight leg raising met only the first and third criteria. Passive and voluntary straight leg raising tests were the only measures that met all three criteria. Therefore, of the objective tests investigated here, only passive or voluntary straight leg raising can be strongly recommended for use in the evaluation of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":76486,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","volume":"21 1","pages":"21-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/21.1.21","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/21.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Nineteen low back pain patients and eight patients not suffering from low back pain were given several tests of flexibility and asymmetry by two different examiners. Three criteria of reliability and validity were used: (1) significant agreement between independent observers, (2) significantly different scores in the groups with and without low back pain, and (3) significant improvement following a successful spinal manipulation. Tests of anterior flexion and asymmetry of foot eversion met only the first and second criteria while tests of hamstring tightness and asymmetry of voluntary straight leg raising met only the first and third criteria. Passive and voluntary straight leg raising tests were the only measures that met all three criteria. Therefore, of the objective tests investigated here, only passive or voluntary straight leg raising can be strongly recommended for use in the evaluation of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰痛及其脊柱操作治疗:灵活性和不对称性的测量。
19名腰痛患者和8名非腰痛患者由两名不同的审查员进行了几项灵活性和不对称性测试。使用了三个信度和效度标准:(1)独立观察者之间的显著一致性;(2)有和没有腰痛的组的得分显著不同;(3)脊柱操作成功后的显著改善。前屈和足外翻不对称测试仅满足第一和第二标准,而腘绳肌紧绷和自主直腿抬高不对称测试仅满足第一和第三标准。被动和自愿直腿抬高试验是唯一满足所有三个标准的措施。因此,在本文调查的客观试验中,只有被动或自愿直腿抬高才能被强烈推荐用于评估脊柱手法治疗腰痛的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of three ways of measuring pain. A double-blind comparative study of metronidazole and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Evaluation of a single daily dose of naproxen in osteoarthritis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient treated with gold salts and benoxaprofen. A pharmacist's audit of antirheumatic drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1