Comparative toxicity of adriamycin and adriamycin-DNA in rats.

L Giroux, C Smeesters, F Boury, G Jean
{"title":"Comparative toxicity of adriamycin and adriamycin-DNA in rats.","authors":"L Giroux,&nbsp;C Smeesters,&nbsp;F Boury,&nbsp;G Jean","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adriamycin (ADR) can be linked to DNA without loss of its antitumoral activity while reducing the acute toxicity of free ADR (Deprez--DeCampeneere et al., 1979, 1980). However, the potential chronic toxic effects of both forms of ADR are poorly documented. For such a study, it is necessary to establish the sequence of treatment allowing the administration of a sufficient amount of drugs to induce chronic toxicity and a schedule leading to prolonged survival of animals. In this study, 24 Lewis rats were injected twice a week during four weeks with either free or DNA-linked ADR, and three dose levels were tested: 4, 2 and 1 mg/kg. Our results indicated that the total cumulative dose of ADR should not exceed 8 mg/kg over one month, if prolonged survival is desired. The binding of ADR to DNA seemed also to reduce the acute toxic effects induced by free ADR, in rats. However, such a beneficial effect was not observed when the chronic nephrotoxicity was considered since characteristic renal lesions were observed in all long-term survivors, whatever the dose and the form of ADR received.</p>","PeriodicalId":79252,"journal":{"name":"Revue canadienne de biologie experimentale","volume":"42 1","pages":"67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue canadienne de biologie experimentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adriamycin (ADR) can be linked to DNA without loss of its antitumoral activity while reducing the acute toxicity of free ADR (Deprez--DeCampeneere et al., 1979, 1980). However, the potential chronic toxic effects of both forms of ADR are poorly documented. For such a study, it is necessary to establish the sequence of treatment allowing the administration of a sufficient amount of drugs to induce chronic toxicity and a schedule leading to prolonged survival of animals. In this study, 24 Lewis rats were injected twice a week during four weeks with either free or DNA-linked ADR, and three dose levels were tested: 4, 2 and 1 mg/kg. Our results indicated that the total cumulative dose of ADR should not exceed 8 mg/kg over one month, if prolonged survival is desired. The binding of ADR to DNA seemed also to reduce the acute toxic effects induced by free ADR, in rats. However, such a beneficial effect was not observed when the chronic nephrotoxicity was considered since characteristic renal lesions were observed in all long-term survivors, whatever the dose and the form of ADR received.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿霉素与阿霉素- dna对大鼠的毒性比较。
阿霉素(ADR)可以与DNA结合而不丧失其抗肿瘤活性,同时降低游离ADR的急性毒性(Deprez- DeCampeneere等人,1970,1980)。然而,这两种形式的不良反应的潜在慢性毒性作用文献很少。对于这样一项研究,有必要建立一个治疗顺序,允许给予足够数量的药物来诱导慢性毒性,并制定一个延长动物生存时间的时间表。在这项研究中,24只Lewis大鼠在四周内每周注射两次游离或dna相关的ADR,测试了3种剂量水平:4、2和1 mg/kg。我们的研究结果表明,如果希望延长生存期,一个月内不良反应的总累积剂量不应超过8mg /kg。在大鼠中,ADR与DNA的结合似乎也减少了由游离ADR引起的急性毒性作用。然而,当考虑慢性肾毒性时,没有观察到这样的有益效果,因为在所有长期幸存者中观察到特征性肾脏病变,无论剂量和不良反应的形式如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanism of action of the sodium pump in vertebrate photoreceptors. Depopulation of lymphocyte migration sites in the lymph node by irradiation and colloidal carbon. Differentiation of bones and skeletal muscles in chick embryos cultured on albumen. [Biology yesterday, today and tomorrow]. [Abstracts of papers presented at the First Biotechnology Colloquium at the University of Montreal, 25-26 March 1983].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1