A comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex, Zimmer, and Zimmer low viscosity bone cements.

S C Weber, W L Bargar
{"title":"A comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex, Zimmer, and Zimmer low viscosity bone cements.","authors":"S C Weber,&nbsp;W L Bargar","doi":"10.3109/10731198309118789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many different methods have been used to compare polymethylmethacrylate bone cements. In this paper the three currently available cements were compared in regard to dough and set times, heat of polymerization, compressive, tensile, 3 and 4 point bending strengths, fracture toughness, flexural modulus, void density distribution, and viscosity. Methods used were ASTM designated for bone cement or plastics in general whenever possible. Significant differences in set and dough times and heat of polymerization were noted. All cements were equal in compressive, tensile, and fracture toughness testing; Zimmer Regular Cement was significantly weaker (p less than 0.001) in flexural testing and had a significantly (p less than 0.001) decreased modulus of elasticity when compared to LVC and Simplex Cements. Void density distributions were not significantly different. Viscosity was shown to vary between these cements as well. This data was analysed both to determine differences between various brands of cement and to assess the relevance to clinical use and failure modes in vivo of these different means of testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":75597,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs","volume":"11 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10731198309118789","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10731198309118789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Many different methods have been used to compare polymethylmethacrylate bone cements. In this paper the three currently available cements were compared in regard to dough and set times, heat of polymerization, compressive, tensile, 3 and 4 point bending strengths, fracture toughness, flexural modulus, void density distribution, and viscosity. Methods used were ASTM designated for bone cement or plastics in general whenever possible. Significant differences in set and dough times and heat of polymerization were noted. All cements were equal in compressive, tensile, and fracture toughness testing; Zimmer Regular Cement was significantly weaker (p less than 0.001) in flexural testing and had a significantly (p less than 0.001) decreased modulus of elasticity when compared to LVC and Simplex Cements. Void density distributions were not significantly different. Viscosity was shown to vary between these cements as well. This data was analysed both to determine differences between various brands of cement and to assess the relevance to clinical use and failure modes in vivo of these different means of testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simplex、Zimmer和Zimmer低粘度骨水泥力学性能的比较。
许多不同的方法被用来比较聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥。在本文中,比较了三种目前可用的水泥的面团和凝固时间,聚合热,压缩,拉伸,3和4点弯曲强度,断裂韧性,弯曲模量,空隙密度分布和粘度。所使用的方法是ASTM指定的骨水泥或塑料一般只要可能。在凝固时间和面团时间以及聚合热方面存在显著差异。所有水泥在压缩、拉伸和断裂韧性测试中均相同;与LVC和Simplex水泥相比,Zimmer Regular水泥在弯曲测试中明显较弱(p < 0.001),并且弹性模量显著降低(p < 0.001)。空隙密度分布差异不显著。黏度在这些胶结物之间也有所不同。对这些数据进行分析,以确定不同品牌水泥之间的差异,并评估这些不同测试方法与临床使用和体内失效模式的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vitro C5a generation by synthetic vascular prostheses: implications for graft incorporation in vivo. Particulate aluminum oxide as a bone graft material. Abstracts. Fifth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference. Shreveport, October 20-21, 1986. Custom-made vaginal balloons for strengthening circumvaginal musculature. Electrical conduction in bone in frequency range 0.4-1.3 GHz.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1