[Comparative study, using 3 methods, of the sensitivity to metronidazole and ornidazole of anaerobic or related bacteria].

Annales de microbiologie Pub Date : 1983-09-01
A Gallusser
{"title":"[Comparative study, using 3 methods, of the sensitivity to metronidazole and ornidazole of anaerobic or related bacteria].","authors":"A Gallusser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comparative study of the sensitivity to metronidazole and ornidazole of 127 anaerobic or microaerophilic strains isolated from various clinical samples showed that the activity of both products was similar: the distribution of sensitive and resistant strains was identical. However, the in vitro activity level of metronidazole was slightly higher. This difference, though statistically significant, had no incidence on therapeutic indications. The determination of sensitivity towards the two nitroimidazoles was carried out by three methods: broth dilution and agar diffusion for metronidazole; and broth dilution and disk-broth for ornidazole. Two of these methods, broth dilution and disk-broth, gave concordant results. Conversely, the limits of the agar diffusion technique were shown to be related to independent biological factors such as bacterial motility and slow growth rate. The poor accuracy of this method limits its use in detecting total resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7904,"journal":{"name":"Annales de microbiologie","volume":"134B 2","pages":"307-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de microbiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative study of the sensitivity to metronidazole and ornidazole of 127 anaerobic or microaerophilic strains isolated from various clinical samples showed that the activity of both products was similar: the distribution of sensitive and resistant strains was identical. However, the in vitro activity level of metronidazole was slightly higher. This difference, though statistically significant, had no incidence on therapeutic indications. The determination of sensitivity towards the two nitroimidazoles was carried out by three methods: broth dilution and agar diffusion for metronidazole; and broth dilution and disk-broth for ornidazole. Two of these methods, broth dilution and disk-broth, gave concordant results. Conversely, the limits of the agar diffusion technique were shown to be related to independent biological factors such as bacterial motility and slow growth rate. The poor accuracy of this method limits its use in detecting total resistance.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[3种方法对厌氧菌及相关菌对甲硝唑和奥硝唑敏感性的比较研究]。
从不同临床样品中分离的127株厌氧或嗜微氧菌株对甲硝唑和奥硝唑的敏感性比较研究表明,两种产物的活性相似,敏感和耐药菌株的分布相同。而甲硝唑的体外活性水平略高。这一差异虽然具有统计学意义,但在治疗指征上没有发生率。采用肉汤稀释法和琼脂扩散法测定甲硝唑对两种硝基咪唑的敏感性;还有奥硝唑的汤汁稀释和碟状汤汁。两种方法,肉汤稀释法和碟肉汤法,结果一致。相反,琼脂扩散技术的限制被证明与独立的生物因素有关,如细菌的运动性和缓慢的生长速度。这种方法精度差,限制了它在总电阻检测中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Production of heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin in a synthetic medium and its assay on a culture of Vero cells]. [Method for the detection and determination of heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin by an immunoenzyme technic on a new polystyrene support adapted for a test kit]. [Antibiotic sensitivity of 139 strains of Listeria serotyped by the National Reference Center in 1983]. [Attempted characterization of microorganisms by their metallic profiles]. [New bacteriophages of Staphylococcus epidermidis: evaluation of their epidemiological value].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1