[Prognostic factors in acute paraquat poisoning. A retrospective study of cases registered by the Poison Control Center of Paris in 1981].

J H Frelon, P Merigot, R Garnier, C Bismuth, M L Efthymiou
{"title":"[Prognostic factors in acute paraquat poisoning. A retrospective study of cases registered by the Poison Control Center of Paris in 1981].","authors":"J H Frelon,&nbsp;P Merigot,&nbsp;R Garnier,&nbsp;C Bismuth,&nbsp;M L Efthymiou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty years after the publication of the first cases, the intoxication with the herbicide Paraquat still has a low prognosis because of no efficient treatment. But many studies have allowed the definition of prognostic factors. Nearly, BISMUTH and als(2) demonstrated that the following criteria are significant: the oral route, the gastric lesions, the organic renal failure, the plasma-Paraquat concentration. Through a series of cases collected in 1981 at the Poison Control Center of Paris, the following prognostic factors have been studied: route of administration, sex of patient, circumstances of the poisoning, ingested volume, concentration of the solution, existence of an emetic in the commercial solution, gastric content, lesions of the upper digestive tract (mouth, oesophagus, stomach), renal impairment, hepatic failure, blood gasometry, lung function tests, plasma and urine paraquat concentrations. Forty-one cases were collected during this period, with thirty-four concerning acute Paraquat poisonings in humans. We studied twenty-seven of them caused by acute oral poisoning, with accidental circumstances in nine cases (two died) and intentional circumstances in eighteen cases (all died) (other cases concerned two ocular projections, four inhalations and one skin projection). The interest of this new investigation is the particularity of our series. Because of our recruitment (larger geographic distribution of patients, larger diversity of circumstances, of routes of administration, of ingested quantities, of treatments...). This series of cases is quite different from others previously published. This study confirms the validity of prognostic factors defined by BISMUTH and als(2). The factors, which look significant, strictly depend on the ingested quantity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":23153,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological European research. Recherche europeenne en toxicologie","volume":"5 4","pages":"163-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological European research. Recherche europeenne en toxicologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty years after the publication of the first cases, the intoxication with the herbicide Paraquat still has a low prognosis because of no efficient treatment. But many studies have allowed the definition of prognostic factors. Nearly, BISMUTH and als(2) demonstrated that the following criteria are significant: the oral route, the gastric lesions, the organic renal failure, the plasma-Paraquat concentration. Through a series of cases collected in 1981 at the Poison Control Center of Paris, the following prognostic factors have been studied: route of administration, sex of patient, circumstances of the poisoning, ingested volume, concentration of the solution, existence of an emetic in the commercial solution, gastric content, lesions of the upper digestive tract (mouth, oesophagus, stomach), renal impairment, hepatic failure, blood gasometry, lung function tests, plasma and urine paraquat concentrations. Forty-one cases were collected during this period, with thirty-four concerning acute Paraquat poisonings in humans. We studied twenty-seven of them caused by acute oral poisoning, with accidental circumstances in nine cases (two died) and intentional circumstances in eighteen cases (all died) (other cases concerned two ocular projections, four inhalations and one skin projection). The interest of this new investigation is the particularity of our series. Because of our recruitment (larger geographic distribution of patients, larger diversity of circumstances, of routes of administration, of ingested quantities, of treatments...). This series of cases is quite different from others previously published. This study confirms the validity of prognostic factors defined by BISMUTH and als(2). The factors, which look significant, strictly depend on the ingested quantity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性百草枯中毒的预后因素。对1981年巴黎毒物控制中心登记的病例进行回顾性研究]。
在第一例病例发表20年后,由于没有有效的治疗方法,百草枯中毒的预后仍然很低。但许多研究允许对预后因素进行定义。近,BISMUTH和als(2)表明以下标准是显著的:口服途径,胃病变,器质性肾功能衰竭,血浆百草枯浓度。通过1981年在巴黎毒物控制中心收集的一系列病例,研究了以下预测因素:给药途径、患者性别、中毒情况、摄入量、溶液浓度、商业溶液中是否存在催吐物、胃内容物、上消化道病变(口腔、食道、胃)、肾功能损害、肝功能衰竭、血气测定、肺功能检查、血浆和尿液百草枯浓度。在此期间收集了41例病例,其中34例涉及人类急性百草枯中毒。我们研究了27例由急性口服中毒引起的病例,其中9例为意外情况(2例死亡),18例为故意情况(全部死亡)(其他病例涉及2例眼部突出,4例吸入和1例皮肤突出)。这项新调查的趣味在于我们这个系列的特殊性。因为我们的招募(患者的地理分布更大,情况更多样化,给药途径,摄入量,治疗……)。这一系列病例与以前发表的其他病例有很大不同。本研究证实了BISMUTH和als定义的预后因素的有效性(2)。这些看起来很重要的因素严格取决于摄入的量。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Medium-term Daphnia test. Evaluation of the toxicity of various trace metals in the presence of humic acids]. [Levels of lead, cadmium and mercury in the hair of inhabitants of the Nantes and Grenoble areas]. [Early pancreatic lesions induced by N-nitroso-bis(2-hydroxypropyl) amine in the golden Syrian hamster]. The effects of EDTA in acute cobalt intoxication in rats. [Toxic pneumopathy following voluntary ingestion of 1 1/2 liters of gas-oil].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1