[Fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus and other species of coagulase-negative staphylococci].

Annales de microbiologie Pub Date : 1984-03-01
J Loulergue, G Pinon, P Laudat, A Audurier
{"title":"[Fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus and other species of coagulase-negative staphylococci].","authors":"J Loulergue,&nbsp;G Pinon,&nbsp;P Laudat,&nbsp;A Audurier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Susceptibility of 121 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci to two antimicrobial agents, novobiocin and fosfomycin, was determined using the agar dilution method. Isolates included 45 strains of Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 26 strains of S. cohnii and S. xylosus, 24 strains of S. epidermidis and 26 strains of S. hominis, S. capitis, S. warneri and S. auricularis . The minimal inhibitory concentration average of fosfomycin for S. saprophyticus differed (p less than 0.001) from that other for novobiocin-resistant staphylococci (S. cohnii and S. xylosus) and for S. epidermidis (p less than 0.001). Out of 45 isolates of S. saprophyticus, 42 were resistant to fosfomycin. The results were very heterogeneous with regard to fosfomycin for all of the other coagulase-negative staphylococci. Resistance to fosfomycin, like resistance to novobiocin, could be used as a presumptive test for the identification of S. saprophyticus.</p>","PeriodicalId":7904,"journal":{"name":"Annales de microbiologie","volume":"135A 2","pages":"239-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de microbiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Susceptibility of 121 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci to two antimicrobial agents, novobiocin and fosfomycin, was determined using the agar dilution method. Isolates included 45 strains of Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 26 strains of S. cohnii and S. xylosus, 24 strains of S. epidermidis and 26 strains of S. hominis, S. capitis, S. warneri and S. auricularis . The minimal inhibitory concentration average of fosfomycin for S. saprophyticus differed (p less than 0.001) from that other for novobiocin-resistant staphylococci (S. cohnii and S. xylosus) and for S. epidermidis (p less than 0.001). Out of 45 isolates of S. saprophyticus, 42 were resistant to fosfomycin. The results were very heterogeneous with regard to fosfomycin for all of the other coagulase-negative staphylococci. Resistance to fosfomycin, like resistance to novobiocin, could be used as a presumptive test for the identification of S. saprophyticus.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腐生葡萄球菌和其他凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对磷霉素的耐药性。
采用琼脂稀释法测定121株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌对新生物素和磷霉素两种抗菌药物的敏感性。其中腐生葡萄球菌45株,柯氏葡萄球菌和木糖葡萄球菌26株,表皮葡萄球菌24株,人型葡萄球菌、头型葡萄球菌、瓦尔纳氏葡萄球菌和耳型葡萄球菌26株。磷霉素对腐生葡萄球菌的最小平均抑制浓度与对新生物素耐药葡萄球菌(柯氏葡萄球菌和木糖葡萄球菌)和表皮葡萄球菌的最小平均抑制浓度差异(p < 0.001)。45株腐生葡萄球菌中有42株对磷霉素耐药。对于所有其他凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,磷霉素的结果是非常不均匀的。对磷霉素的耐药性与对新生物素的耐药性一样,可以作为腐生葡萄球菌鉴定的推定标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Production of heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin in a synthetic medium and its assay on a culture of Vero cells]. [Method for the detection and determination of heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin by an immunoenzyme technic on a new polystyrene support adapted for a test kit]. [Antibiotic sensitivity of 139 strains of Listeria serotyped by the National Reference Center in 1983]. [Attempted characterization of microorganisms by their metallic profiles]. [New bacteriophages of Staphylococcus epidermidis: evaluation of their epidemiological value].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1