Relationship of CSF shunting and IQ in children with myelomeningocele: a retrospective analysis.

Child's brain Pub Date : 1984-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000120166
T B Mapstone, H L Rekate, F E Nulsen, M S Dixon, N Glaser, M Jaffe
{"title":"Relationship of CSF shunting and IQ in children with myelomeningocele: a retrospective analysis.","authors":"T B Mapstone,&nbsp;H L Rekate,&nbsp;F E Nulsen,&nbsp;M S Dixon,&nbsp;N Glaser,&nbsp;M Jaffe","doi":"10.1159/000120166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reviews 75 infants with myelomeningocele treated either at birth or from an early age at Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, for whom complete records and psychometric testing (IQ) are available (including complete summaries from referring hospitals). Three groups are compared: (1) infants without complications who were shunted for hydrocephalus (n = 41); (2) infants with complications who were shunted (n = 16), and (3) infants who were not shunted (n = 18). Complications were defined as ventriculitis (positive CSF cultures with elevated protein, depressed glucose and inflammatory cells), anoxia, poorly controlled hydrocephalus or other CNS anomalies such as porencephaly. The mean IQ of infants who were not shunted was 104, of those shunted without complications it was 91, and of those shunted who had complications it was 70. These IQ differences were significant at p less than 0.01, and were not explained by differences in spinal lesion levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9836,"journal":{"name":"Child's brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000120166","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's brain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000120166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

This paper reviews 75 infants with myelomeningocele treated either at birth or from an early age at Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, for whom complete records and psychometric testing (IQ) are available (including complete summaries from referring hospitals). Three groups are compared: (1) infants without complications who were shunted for hydrocephalus (n = 41); (2) infants with complications who were shunted (n = 16), and (3) infants who were not shunted (n = 18). Complications were defined as ventriculitis (positive CSF cultures with elevated protein, depressed glucose and inflammatory cells), anoxia, poorly controlled hydrocephalus or other CNS anomalies such as porencephaly. The mean IQ of infants who were not shunted was 104, of those shunted without complications it was 91, and of those shunted who had complications it was 70. These IQ differences were significant at p less than 0.01, and were not explained by differences in spinal lesion levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓脊膜膨出患儿脑脊液分流与智商的关系:回顾性分析。
本文回顾了75名在彩虹婴儿和儿童医院出生或早期治疗的脊髓脊膜膨出婴儿,他们的完整记录和心理测量测试(智商)是可用的(包括转诊医院的完整摘要)。三组比较:(1)无并发症的婴儿因脑积水行分流术(n = 41);(2)合并并发症的分流婴儿(n = 16),(3)未分流婴儿(n = 18)。并发症定义为脑室炎(脑脊液培养阳性,蛋白升高,葡萄糖和炎症细胞下降),缺氧,控制不佳的脑积水或其他中枢神经系统异常,如脑孔畸形。没有分流的婴儿的平均智商是104,分流没有并发症的是91,分流有并发症的是70。这些智商差异在p < 0.01时具有显著性,并且不能用脊髓损伤程度的差异来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence for late developmental deficit in very low birth weight infants surviving intraventricular hemorrhage. Shunt nephritis: a report on five children. Cystoperitoneal shunting for congenital arachnoid cysts. Dorsal cyst malformations. Part I. Clinical study and critical review on the definition of holoprosencephaly. High-dose 1-(4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)-methyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)-3-nitro sou rea hydrochloride (ACNU) with autologous bone marrow rescue for patients with brain stem tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1