Thermography in the assessment of peripheral joint inflammation--a re-evaluation.

C Rajapakse, D M Grennan, C Jones, L Wilkinson, M Jayson
{"title":"Thermography in the assessment of peripheral joint inflammation--a re-evaluation.","authors":"C Rajapakse,&nbsp;D M Grennan,&nbsp;C Jones,&nbsp;L Wilkinson,&nbsp;M Jayson","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/20.2.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reproducibility and sensitivity of quantitative infra-red thermography as a measure of peripheral joint inflammation was reassessed. Experiments were carried out in a temperature-controlled room at 20 degrees C. Initial stabilization experiments showed that in normal, medium sized, joints, there was an initial rapid cooling phase followed by a slower cooling phase which lasted longer than two hours. In the knees the differences between normal and active rheumatoid joints increased the longer patients remained in the room but for practical reasons a 30-minute stabilization period was subsequently chosen. In views of hands and fingers, rebound increases in skin temperature after entering the room, together with lesser differences between inflamed and non-inflamed joints, were found. The results suggested that the thermographic technique examined was adequate for detecting inflammatory changes in knee, ankles and elbows but unsatisfactory for quantification of inflammation in the small joints of the hands.</p>","PeriodicalId":76486,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","volume":"20 2","pages":"81-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/20.2.81","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/20.2.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

The reproducibility and sensitivity of quantitative infra-red thermography as a measure of peripheral joint inflammation was reassessed. Experiments were carried out in a temperature-controlled room at 20 degrees C. Initial stabilization experiments showed that in normal, medium sized, joints, there was an initial rapid cooling phase followed by a slower cooling phase which lasted longer than two hours. In the knees the differences between normal and active rheumatoid joints increased the longer patients remained in the room but for practical reasons a 30-minute stabilization period was subsequently chosen. In views of hands and fingers, rebound increases in skin temperature after entering the room, together with lesser differences between inflamed and non-inflamed joints, were found. The results suggested that the thermographic technique examined was adequate for detecting inflammatory changes in knee, ankles and elbows but unsatisfactory for quantification of inflammation in the small joints of the hands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
热成像评估外周关节炎症——再评价。
定量红外热成像作为外周关节炎症测量的再现性和敏感性被重新评估。实验是在温度控制在20摄氏度的房间里进行的。初步的稳定实验表明,在正常的、中等大小的关节中,有一个最初的快速冷却阶段,然后是一个缓慢的冷却阶段,持续时间超过两个小时。在膝关节上,正常和活动的类风湿关节之间的差异随着患者留在房间的时间延长而增加,但出于实际原因,随后选择了30分钟的稳定期。从手和手指的角度来看,进入房间后皮肤温度反弹增加,同时炎症和非炎症关节之间的差异较小。结果表明,热成像技术用于检测膝关节、脚踝和肘部的炎症变化是足够的,但对于手部小关节的炎症量化却不满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of three ways of measuring pain. A double-blind comparative study of metronidazole and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Evaluation of a single daily dose of naproxen in osteoarthritis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient treated with gold salts and benoxaprofen. A pharmacist's audit of antirheumatic drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1