Use and misuse of the tape-measure as a means of assessing muscle strength and power.

H Cooper, W N Dodds, I D Adams, F T DeDombal, V A Steele
{"title":"Use and misuse of the tape-measure as a means of assessing muscle strength and power.","authors":"H Cooper,&nbsp;W N Dodds,&nbsp;I D Adams,&nbsp;F T DeDombal,&nbsp;V A Steele","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/20.4.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The tape-measure is frequently used by the medical profession to assess muscle function following injury. It is assumed that increasing limb girth is reflected by increasing muscle power and strength; but this assumption is empirical and may not in practice be justified. The relationship between thigh circumference and muscle strength and power, measured as the torque produced on an isokinetic dynamometer, was assessed in 64 subjects--24 non-injured sportsmen and 40 injured sportsmen. The correlation between the torque produced at the knee by the knee extensors and flexors and the thigh circumference at three levels was not significant in either group. Comparison of the injured with the non-injured limb also failed to show any correlation. By contrast, in eight subjects, repeated measurements over a six to eight month period showed a significant relationship between change in thigh circumference and change in quadriceps power. It is concluded that a single measurement of circumference at the same point in both thighs of a subject with unilateral injury should not be used as an assessment of muscle function. Serial measurements, however, at the 4 and 10 cm levels may be of value as an index of quadriceps power. Reasons for this are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76486,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","volume":"20 4","pages":"211-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/20.4.211","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/20.4.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The tape-measure is frequently used by the medical profession to assess muscle function following injury. It is assumed that increasing limb girth is reflected by increasing muscle power and strength; but this assumption is empirical and may not in practice be justified. The relationship between thigh circumference and muscle strength and power, measured as the torque produced on an isokinetic dynamometer, was assessed in 64 subjects--24 non-injured sportsmen and 40 injured sportsmen. The correlation between the torque produced at the knee by the knee extensors and flexors and the thigh circumference at three levels was not significant in either group. Comparison of the injured with the non-injured limb also failed to show any correlation. By contrast, in eight subjects, repeated measurements over a six to eight month period showed a significant relationship between change in thigh circumference and change in quadriceps power. It is concluded that a single measurement of circumference at the same point in both thighs of a subject with unilateral injury should not be used as an assessment of muscle function. Serial measurements, however, at the 4 and 10 cm levels may be of value as an index of quadriceps power. Reasons for this are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用和误用卷尺作为评估肌肉力量和力量的手段。
医学界经常使用卷尺来评估受伤后的肌肉功能。假设肢体周长的增加反映在肌肉力量和力量的增加上;但这种假设是经验性的,在实践中可能不成立。大腿围与肌肉力量和力量之间的关系,通过等速测功机产生的扭矩来测量,在64名受试者中进行了评估——24名未受伤的运动员和40名受伤的运动员。在两组中,膝关节伸屈肌产生的扭矩与三个水平的大腿围度之间的相关性均不显著。损伤肢体与非损伤肢体的比较也没有显示出任何相关性。相比之下,在8名受试者中,在6到8个月的时间里反复测量显示大腿围的变化和股四头肌力量的变化之间存在显著的关系。结论是,单侧损伤受试者的双大腿同一点圆周的单一测量不应作为肌肉功能的评估。然而,在4和10厘米水平的连续测量可能作为股四头肌力量的指标有价值。对其原因进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of three ways of measuring pain. A double-blind comparative study of metronidazole and placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. Evaluation of a single daily dose of naproxen in osteoarthritis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient treated with gold salts and benoxaprofen. A pharmacist's audit of antirheumatic drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1