Non-use of physicians: Methodological approaches, policy implications, and the utility of decision models

James C. Young✠
{"title":"Non-use of physicians: Methodological approaches, policy implications, and the utility of decision models","authors":"James C. Young✠","doi":"10.1016/0160-7987(81)90024-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper considers ethnographic approaches to the study of health-care choice making in medically pluralistic settings. It focuses on the ways in which different methodological orientations may lead to varying explanations for the non-use of Western-style medical treatment, having dissimilar implications for policies concerning the delivery of health services in such settings. Several approaches are evaluated in terms of their utility for determining the relative effects of endogenous, culturally derived influences, as compared with exogenous, primarily accessibility-related factors, as constraints on the choice of a physician's treatment. Results of the application of a cognitively-oriented decision modeling approach in a rural Mexican community are described, and the comparative advantages of this approach are emphasized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79261,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 499-507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7987(81)90024-7","citationCount":"50","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part B, Medical anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160798781900247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

Abstract

This paper considers ethnographic approaches to the study of health-care choice making in medically pluralistic settings. It focuses on the ways in which different methodological orientations may lead to varying explanations for the non-use of Western-style medical treatment, having dissimilar implications for policies concerning the delivery of health services in such settings. Several approaches are evaluated in terms of their utility for determining the relative effects of endogenous, culturally derived influences, as compared with exogenous, primarily accessibility-related factors, as constraints on the choice of a physician's treatment. Results of the application of a cognitively-oriented decision modeling approach in a rural Mexican community are described, and the comparative advantages of this approach are emphasized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不使用医生:方法方法、政策含义和决策模型的效用
本文考虑了人种学的方法来研究医疗多元化环境下的医疗保健选择。报告着重指出,不同的方法取向可能导致对不使用西式医疗的不同解释,从而对在这种情况下提供保健服务的政策产生不同的影响。对几种方法的效用进行了评估,以确定内源性的、文化衍生的影响与外源性的、主要与可及性相关的因素的相对影响,作为医生选择治疗的制约因素。本文描述了一种面向认知的决策建模方法在墨西哥农村社区的应用结果,并强调了这种方法的比较优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The educational value of participatory evaluation of primary health care programmes: An experience with four indigenous populations in Ecuador ‘Tonic’, ‘fuel’ and ‘food’: Social and symbolic aspects of the long-term use of psychotropic drugs Ripe and unripe: Concepts of health and sickness in ayurvedic medicine Intestinal parasitism in seminomadic pastoralists and subsistence farmers in and around irrigation schemes in the Awash Valley, Ethiopia, with special emphasis on ecological and cultural associations Disease classification in rural Ghana: Framework and implications for health behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1