Ultrasonic aspiration in the surgical treatment of intracranial tumors.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 1981-01-01
V A Fasano, S Zeme, L Frego, R Gunetti
{"title":"Ultrasonic aspiration in the surgical treatment of intracranial tumors.","authors":"V A Fasano,&nbsp;S Zeme,&nbsp;L Frego,&nbsp;R Gunetti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The CUSATM (Cavitron Corporation - Stamford, Conn., USA) has been used for aspiration and ultrasonic fragmentation in 52 cases of intracranial tumors: 24 meningiomas, 20 gliomas, 5 acoustic neurinomas, 1 cerebral metastasis, 1 pinealoma, 1 pituitary adenoma in our Clinic, since January 1979. Several advantages of the CUSA were found as compared to conventional techniques: it provides good visibility of the operating field: pathologic tissue can be removed from the surface to the deep structures and only one instrument is present in the surgical cavity; its use reduces manipulation, traction and thermic effects on nearby tissue; it selectively spares major vessels and has a hemostatic effect on those less than 1 mm in diameter. The rapidity of the action of the CUSA is relative to the consistency of the tissue. Tumors of high consistency are very slowly removed by the CUSA, and its use is not worthwhile. In our cases no damage to the surrounding structures was evident. Preliminary experimental data suggest that the use of the CUSA be avoided near the brain stem or within the spinal cord. However, in a cervical ependymoma of our series, the CUSA provided complete removal of the mass without complications. This result was achieved by using lower vibratory power: we were thus able to remove pathologic soft tissue without clinically evident damage to the surrounding structures. In some particular situations the volume and the shape of the instrument can be a hindrance, and some modifications are suggested: a bayonet shape and longer tip would facilitate the reaching of deep structures and permit its use in transphenoidal surgery; incorporation of a cautery in the tip, so that contemporary hemostasis can be accomplished. Our experience indicates that the use in transphenoidal surgery; incorporation of a cautery in the tip, so that contemporary hemostasis can be accomplished. Our experience indicates that the use of the CUSA is better indicated in deep tumors: meningiomas of the base of the skull, acoustic neurinomas, pinealomas, pituitary adenomas. In gliomas it is very useful in the selective removal of the neoplastic tissue in functionally important areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The CUSATM (Cavitron Corporation - Stamford, Conn., USA) has been used for aspiration and ultrasonic fragmentation in 52 cases of intracranial tumors: 24 meningiomas, 20 gliomas, 5 acoustic neurinomas, 1 cerebral metastasis, 1 pinealoma, 1 pituitary adenoma in our Clinic, since January 1979. Several advantages of the CUSA were found as compared to conventional techniques: it provides good visibility of the operating field: pathologic tissue can be removed from the surface to the deep structures and only one instrument is present in the surgical cavity; its use reduces manipulation, traction and thermic effects on nearby tissue; it selectively spares major vessels and has a hemostatic effect on those less than 1 mm in diameter. The rapidity of the action of the CUSA is relative to the consistency of the tissue. Tumors of high consistency are very slowly removed by the CUSA, and its use is not worthwhile. In our cases no damage to the surrounding structures was evident. Preliminary experimental data suggest that the use of the CUSA be avoided near the brain stem or within the spinal cord. However, in a cervical ependymoma of our series, the CUSA provided complete removal of the mass without complications. This result was achieved by using lower vibratory power: we were thus able to remove pathologic soft tissue without clinically evident damage to the surrounding structures. In some particular situations the volume and the shape of the instrument can be a hindrance, and some modifications are suggested: a bayonet shape and longer tip would facilitate the reaching of deep structures and permit its use in transphenoidal surgery; incorporation of a cautery in the tip, so that contemporary hemostasis can be accomplished. Our experience indicates that the use in transphenoidal surgery; incorporation of a cautery in the tip, so that contemporary hemostasis can be accomplished. Our experience indicates that the use of the CUSA is better indicated in deep tumors: meningiomas of the base of the skull, acoustic neurinomas, pinealomas, pituitary adenomas. In gliomas it is very useful in the selective removal of the neoplastic tissue in functionally important areas.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声抽吸在颅内肿瘤手术治疗中的应用。
CUSATM (Cavitron Corporation - Stamford, Conn, USA)自1979年1月以来,在我们的诊所使用了52例颅内肿瘤:24例脑膜瘤,20例胶质瘤,5例听神经瘤,1例脑转移瘤,1例松果体瘤,1例垂体腺瘤。与传统技术相比,CUSA的几个优点是:它提供了良好的手术视野;病理组织可以从表面去除到深层结构,并且在手术腔中只存在一种仪器;它的使用减少了对附近组织的操纵、牵引和热效应;它选择性地保留主要血管,对直径小于1mm的血管有止血作用。CUSA的作用速度与组织的稠度有关。高稠度的肿瘤用CUSA去除很慢,不值得使用。在我们的案例中,周围的结构没有明显的损坏。初步实验数据表明,应避免在脑干附近或脊髓内使用CUSA。然而,在本系列的宫颈室管膜瘤中,CUSA提供了肿块的完全切除,无并发症。这一结果是通过使用较低的振动功率实现的:我们因此能够去除病理软组织,而不会对周围结构造成明显的临床损伤。在某些特殊情况下,器械的体积和形状可能会成为障碍,建议进行一些修改:卡口形状和较长的尖端将有助于到达深部结构,并允许其在蝶窦手术中使用;尖端烧灼术的结合,使当代止血得以完成。我们的经验表明,在经蝶窦手术中使用;尖端烧灼术的结合,使当代止血得以完成。我们的经验表明,CUSA的使用更适合于深部肿瘤:颅底脑膜瘤、听神经瘤、松果体瘤、垂体腺瘤。在神经胶质瘤中,选择性切除功能重要部位的肿瘤组织是非常有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the performance metrics of two frailty scales in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intracranial complications of sinogenic and otogenic infections in children: single center study in a global increasing trend. Clinical outcomes of ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations in the pediatric population. Artificial intelligence in diagnostic neurosurgery: promising results and need for rigorous validation. Transcranial Doppler in diagnosing and monitoring reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1