Examination of the effects of pimozide on two conditional discrimination problems differing in levels of task complexity

Carolyn Szostak, Tom N. Tombaugh, Jo Tombaugh
{"title":"Examination of the effects of pimozide on two conditional discrimination problems differing in levels of task complexity","authors":"Carolyn Szostak,&nbsp;Tom N. Tombaugh,&nbsp;Jo Tombaugh","doi":"10.1016/0364-7722(81)90058-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. Two levels of task complexity were used to determine the degree to which pimozide, a DA receptor blocker, influenced performance on a conditional discrimination task.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. Pigeons were trained on a simultaneous matching-to-sample task. On behalf the trials they were required to peck the side key that was the same color as the center key (identity matching). For the remaining trials subjects were presented with a symbolic matching procedure—red was correct when the sample was a vertical line and green was correct for a horizontal line. When performance was stable all subjects received four doses of pimozide i.m. (vehicle, 0.05, 0.15 and 0.45 mg/kg) according to a Latin Square sequence.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. Pimozide increased response latencies and decreased rates of responding. Accuracy of responding on identity trials was not altered by pimozide while it was decreased on symbolic matching trials.</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>4. It was concluded that (a) highly complex tasks are more sensitive to the effects of pimozide than are simple tasks, and (b) dopaminergic systems may be involved in the maintenance of complex learned behavior.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":20801,"journal":{"name":"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0364-7722(81)90058-8","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0364772281900588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

  • 1.

    1. Two levels of task complexity were used to determine the degree to which pimozide, a DA receptor blocker, influenced performance on a conditional discrimination task.

  • 2.

    2. Pigeons were trained on a simultaneous matching-to-sample task. On behalf the trials they were required to peck the side key that was the same color as the center key (identity matching). For the remaining trials subjects were presented with a symbolic matching procedure—red was correct when the sample was a vertical line and green was correct for a horizontal line. When performance was stable all subjects received four doses of pimozide i.m. (vehicle, 0.05, 0.15 and 0.45 mg/kg) according to a Latin Square sequence.

  • 3.

    3. Pimozide increased response latencies and decreased rates of responding. Accuracy of responding on identity trials was not altered by pimozide while it was decreased on symbolic matching trials.

  • 4.

    4. It was concluded that (a) highly complex tasks are more sensitive to the effects of pimozide than are simple tasks, and (b) dopaminergic systems may be involved in the maintenance of complex learned behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验匹莫齐特对两个任务复杂程度不同的条件歧视问题的影响
1.1. 使用两个级别的任务复杂性来确定pimozide(一种DA受体阻滞剂)在多大程度上影响条件辨别任务的表现。鸽子接受了同时匹配样本任务的训练。代表试验,他们被要求啄与中心键相同颜色的侧键(身份匹配)。在剩下的试验中,受试者被展示了一个符号匹配程序,当样本是垂直线时,绿色是正确的,当样本是水平线时,绿色是正确的。当表现稳定时,所有受试者按拉丁方顺序给予四剂量吡莫齐(对照,0.05,0.15和0.45 mg/kg)。吡莫齐特增加了反应延迟,降低了反应率。4.4.匹莫齐特不改变认同试验的反应准确性,但降低了符号匹配试验的反应准确性。结论是:(a)高度复杂的任务比简单的任务对匹莫齐特的影响更敏感;(b)多巴胺能系统可能参与复杂学习行为的维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction Author index Introduction Editorial Board Drug induced dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1