Protection against pertussis by immunisation.

IF 93.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Medical Journal Pub Date : 1980-12-13 DOI:10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1636-d
E Walker
{"title":"Protection against pertussis by immunisation.","authors":"E Walker","doi":"10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1636-d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"pregnancy. It would, however, be most inappropriate in the context of a sudden increase in blood pressure in the third trimester, particularly if the patient was pregnant for the first time. The reason for this does not lie in the inherent danger of this modest elevation in the blood pressure but the warning it gives of possible impending severe pre-eclampsia. The possibility that this dangerous condition may develop very rapidly justifies a policy of admission in predisposed patients. The alternative policy of outpatient management is only permissible in the case of very reliable patients who have been taught to use Albustix daily. It is stated that diuretics \"do not improve the prognosis of hypertension in pregnancy.\" While this is certainly true, it should be remembered that treatment with methyldopa itself has little or no influence on fetal prognosis.' The most important reason for withholding diuretic treatment in pre-eclampsia is that it may aggravate the hypovolaemia which is characteristic of this condition.2 The first agent mentioned for the parenteral treatment of acutely raised blood pressure is diazoxide. While small doses of this substance have been used without ill effect, the first line of treatment in most hospitals is parenteral hydrallazine.3 Inadequate response to this well-tried agent is extremely rare and, furthermore, it does not have the antidiuretic and tocolytic effects of diazoxide. Infusions of labetolol were recommended and I have found this agent to be safe and effective in lowering acute elevations of blood pressure in pregnancy. The literature contains no reference to its use in obstetrics, though this may well become the drug of first choice in fulminating pre-eclampsia, as it combines considerable potency with more gradual hypotensive effect. This is less likely to jeopardise uteroplacental blood flow. I agree with the authors' statement that longterm use of beta-blockers in pregnancy is controversial.4 However, many authors have failed to confirm reports of an increased perinatal mortality and one author has found an improvement in fetal outcome when oxprenolol was used for hypertension in pregnancy.5","PeriodicalId":9321,"journal":{"name":"British Medical Journal","volume":"281 6255","pages":"1636-7"},"PeriodicalIF":93.6000,"publicationDate":"1980-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1636-d","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.281.6255.1636-d","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

pregnancy. It would, however, be most inappropriate in the context of a sudden increase in blood pressure in the third trimester, particularly if the patient was pregnant for the first time. The reason for this does not lie in the inherent danger of this modest elevation in the blood pressure but the warning it gives of possible impending severe pre-eclampsia. The possibility that this dangerous condition may develop very rapidly justifies a policy of admission in predisposed patients. The alternative policy of outpatient management is only permissible in the case of very reliable patients who have been taught to use Albustix daily. It is stated that diuretics "do not improve the prognosis of hypertension in pregnancy." While this is certainly true, it should be remembered that treatment with methyldopa itself has little or no influence on fetal prognosis.' The most important reason for withholding diuretic treatment in pre-eclampsia is that it may aggravate the hypovolaemia which is characteristic of this condition.2 The first agent mentioned for the parenteral treatment of acutely raised blood pressure is diazoxide. While small doses of this substance have been used without ill effect, the first line of treatment in most hospitals is parenteral hydrallazine.3 Inadequate response to this well-tried agent is extremely rare and, furthermore, it does not have the antidiuretic and tocolytic effects of diazoxide. Infusions of labetolol were recommended and I have found this agent to be safe and effective in lowering acute elevations of blood pressure in pregnancy. The literature contains no reference to its use in obstetrics, though this may well become the drug of first choice in fulminating pre-eclampsia, as it combines considerable potency with more gradual hypotensive effect. This is less likely to jeopardise uteroplacental blood flow. I agree with the authors' statement that longterm use of beta-blockers in pregnancy is controversial.4 However, many authors have failed to confirm reports of an increased perinatal mortality and one author has found an improvement in fetal outcome when oxprenolol was used for hypertension in pregnancy.5
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过免疫接种预防百日咳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Medical Journal
British Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.78
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer reviewed medical journal and a fully “online first” publication. Our publishing model—”continuous publication”— means that all articles appear on bmj.com before being included in an issue of the print journal. The website is updated daily with the BMJ’s latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, as well as podcasts, videos, and blogs.
期刊最新文献
Male procreative superiority index (MPSI): the missing coefficient in African anthropogenetics. Chlorosis, anaemia, and anorexia nervosa. The Hamadryad Hospital Ship for Seamen, 1866-1905. Nature of Samuel Pepys's "wind colic". Unquiet sleep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1