[What about partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy or Zarate's operation? Review of the literature].

M Manouana, P Vouillaume, P N Mbanzulu
{"title":"[What about partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy or Zarate's operation? Review of the literature].","authors":"M Manouana,&nbsp;P Vouillaume,&nbsp;P N Mbanzulu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is a review of the literature on Zarate's partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy. Unfortunately, this operation is now forgotten since many obstetricians in western countries and even those of developing countries feel that symphysiotomy is an obsolete obstetric procedure. Partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy is an operation intended to widen the maternal pelvis in order to enable vaginal delivery in the presence of moderate feto-pelvic disproportion. The procedure, which requires only a urinary catheter, a scalpel and local anesthesia, consists of division of the anterior ligament of the public symphysis and part of the inferior ligament (arcuate ligament of the pelvis), while leaving intact the superior ligament or \"anatomo-surgical restraint\" of Zarate, ensuring limitation of pelvic spread. Symphysiotomy has currently been abandoned by all or almost all teams because of its alleged maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. We feel, however, that in certain rural areas of third world countries, often ill-equipped and with poor medical services, this procedure can still be very useful in certain exceptional situations in dystocia by moderate feto-pelvic disproportion, in circumstances in which cesarean section is impossible. The experience of the rare teams still using symphysiotomy shows that a degree of disdain is legitimate in face of the ominous reservations expressed as to the possible complications of this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is a review of the literature on Zarate's partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy. Unfortunately, this operation is now forgotten since many obstetricians in western countries and even those of developing countries feel that symphysiotomy is an obsolete obstetric procedure. Partial subcutaneous symphysiotomy is an operation intended to widen the maternal pelvis in order to enable vaginal delivery in the presence of moderate feto-pelvic disproportion. The procedure, which requires only a urinary catheter, a scalpel and local anesthesia, consists of division of the anterior ligament of the public symphysis and part of the inferior ligament (arcuate ligament of the pelvis), while leaving intact the superior ligament or "anatomo-surgical restraint" of Zarate, ensuring limitation of pelvic spread. Symphysiotomy has currently been abandoned by all or almost all teams because of its alleged maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. We feel, however, that in certain rural areas of third world countries, often ill-equipped and with poor medical services, this procedure can still be very useful in certain exceptional situations in dystocia by moderate feto-pelvic disproportion, in circumstances in which cesarean section is impossible. The experience of the rare teams still using symphysiotomy shows that a degree of disdain is legitimate in face of the ominous reservations expressed as to the possible complications of this procedure.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮下联合切开术或Zarate手术怎么样?文献综述]。
本研究是对Zarate的部分皮下联合切开术的文献回顾。不幸的是,由于西方国家甚至发展中国家的许多产科医生认为联合骨切开术是一种过时的产科手术,这种手术现在被遗忘了。部分皮下联合切开术是一种旨在扩大产妇骨盆的手术,以便在存在中度胎儿-骨盆比例失调的情况下阴道分娩。该手术只需要导尿管、手术刀和局部麻醉,包括切开耻骨联合前韧带和部分下韧带(骨盆弓形韧带),同时保留上韧带或Zarate的“解剖-外科约束”,以确保限制骨盆扩散。联合节切开术目前已被所有或几乎所有的团队放弃,因为它所谓的产妇和胎儿的发病率和死亡率。然而,我们认为,在第三世界国家的某些农村地区,往往设备落后,医疗服务差,这种手术在某些特殊情况下仍然是非常有用的,这些情况是由于中度胎盆比例失调造成的难产,在不可能进行剖宫产的情况下。仍然使用联合切开术的少数团队的经验表明,面对对该手术可能出现的并发症所表达的不祥保留意见,一定程度的蔑视是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Granulomatous endometritis]. [Vaginal sacral-spinal fixation or Richter's procedure. Experience of a surgical team with 54 cases]. [Granulomatous mastitis]. [Pregnancy after transposition and repositioning of the ovaries in a patient with clear-cell adenocarcinoma]. [Struma ovarii. A case report].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1