[Comparison of the effects of Rocgel and anti-H2 on the symptomatology of gastroesophageal reflux without esophagitis].

P Houcke, C Maffioli, J Corallo, A Bouxin-Sauzet, A L Martin
{"title":"[Comparison of the effects of Rocgel and anti-H2 on the symptomatology of gastroesophageal reflux without esophagitis].","authors":"P Houcke,&nbsp;C Maffioli,&nbsp;J Corallo,&nbsp;A Bouxin-Sauzet,&nbsp;A L Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy of boehmite (Rocgel) and of ranitidine was compared in a randomized, double-blind 4-week trial in patients with symptomatic, endoscopically free macroscopic reflux oesophagitis. Of the 64 patients who completed the study 33 received boehmite and 31 ranitidine. Significant symptomatic improvement occurred in both treatment groups (global clinical score and self evaluation by patients) (p < 0.001). Disappearance of heartburn was 52 per cent (15/29) with boehmite and 53 per cent (16/30) with ranitidine. Disappearance of regurgitation was 48 per cent (10/21) with both treatments. 33% of the patients became totally symptom-free. Our results indicate that boehmite seems to be at least as effective as ranitidine in relieving symptoms. Cost of treatment with boehmite, on the other hand is cheaper than ranitidine. As a safe, locally active mucosal protecting agent and antacid, boehmite is an effective drug for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis without macroscopic lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7918,"journal":{"name":"Annales de gastroenterologie et d'hepatologie","volume":"31 4","pages":"264-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de gastroenterologie et d'hepatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy of boehmite (Rocgel) and of ranitidine was compared in a randomized, double-blind 4-week trial in patients with symptomatic, endoscopically free macroscopic reflux oesophagitis. Of the 64 patients who completed the study 33 received boehmite and 31 ranitidine. Significant symptomatic improvement occurred in both treatment groups (global clinical score and self evaluation by patients) (p < 0.001). Disappearance of heartburn was 52 per cent (15/29) with boehmite and 53 per cent (16/30) with ranitidine. Disappearance of regurgitation was 48 per cent (10/21) with both treatments. 33% of the patients became totally symptom-free. Our results indicate that boehmite seems to be at least as effective as ranitidine in relieving symptoms. Cost of treatment with boehmite, on the other hand is cheaper than ranitidine. As a safe, locally active mucosal protecting agent and antacid, boehmite is an effective drug for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis without macroscopic lesions.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Rocgel与抗h2对无食管炎胃食管反流症状的影响比较]。
在一项随机、双盲、为期4周的试验中,对有症状的、无内窥镜的宏观反流性食管炎患者使用薄水石(Rocgel)和雷尼替丁的疗效进行了比较。在64名完成研究的患者中,33名接受勃米特治疗,31名接受雷尼替丁治疗。两个治疗组的症状均有显著改善(总体临床评分和患者自我评价)(p < 0.001)。勃赫米特组和雷尼替丁组胃灼热消失率分别为52%(15/29)和53%(16/30)。两种治疗方法的反流消失率为48%(10/21)。33%的患者症状完全消失。我们的研究结果表明薄水铝石在缓解症状方面至少和雷尼替丁一样有效。另一方面,用薄铝石治疗的费用比雷尼替丁便宜。薄水铝石是一种安全、局部有效的粘膜保护剂和抗酸剂,是治疗无宏观病变的反流性食管炎的有效药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Collagenous colitis]. [Liver abscess: diagnosis and treatment. Study of a series of 22 cases]. [Takayasu disease in Crohn disease: an exceptional association]. [Ménétrier disease associated with a gastric adenocarcinoma. Apropos of 2 cases]. [An abnormality of the biliopancreatic junction associated with an ectopic anastomosis of the common bile duct into the 3rd section of the duodenum].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1