Echocardiography in infective endocarditis: reassessment of the diagnostic criteria of vegetation as evaluated from the precordial and transesophageal approach.

American journal of cardiac imaging Pub Date : 1995-07-01
F Chirillo, A Bruni, T Giujusa, O Totis, A Cavarzerani, P Stritoni
{"title":"Echocardiography in infective endocarditis: reassessment of the diagnostic criteria of vegetation as evaluated from the precordial and transesophageal approach.","authors":"F Chirillo,&nbsp;A Bruni,&nbsp;T Giujusa,&nbsp;O Totis,&nbsp;A Cavarzerani,&nbsp;P Stritoni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The echocardiographic characteristics of vegetation used by precordial echocardiography (PE) have been transferred unchanged to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which has different image definition and structural resolution. Twelve diagnostic criteria of vegetation were tested for their accuracy in 52 patients evaluated by PE and TEE for suspected endocarditis (36 men, 16 women; mean age, 62 +/- 18 years; 42 with proven endocarditis). Results of PE and TEE were validated against gross anatomic and histologic findings. Significant differences (P < .05) included the fact that TEE disclosed more vegetations not prolapsing in the subvalvular region and in absence of valvular regurgitation. At TEE vegetations presented motion distinct from the endocardial surface, irregular conformation, and uneven margins. Only chaotic motion was significantly associated with vegetations at PE; size < 0.5 cm and increased echogenicity characterized pseudovegetations at PE. Other features such as shaggy echoes or location out of the annular zone (previously indicated as typical of vegetations) were not significantly associated with infective lesions. Discriminant analysis of TEE characteristics of vegetations disclosed that chaotic motion was the variable most significantly (P = .008) associated with vegetation. Coexistence of this sign with size < 0.5 cm and uneven margins was associated with 93.3% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity. In conclusion, the echocardiographic aspect of vegetations is rather different when examined from the precordial and the transesophageal approach. Learning about pitfalls and normal variants should improve TEE specificity in the assessment of infective lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":79315,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiac imaging","volume":"9 3","pages":"174-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiac imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The echocardiographic characteristics of vegetation used by precordial echocardiography (PE) have been transferred unchanged to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which has different image definition and structural resolution. Twelve diagnostic criteria of vegetation were tested for their accuracy in 52 patients evaluated by PE and TEE for suspected endocarditis (36 men, 16 women; mean age, 62 +/- 18 years; 42 with proven endocarditis). Results of PE and TEE were validated against gross anatomic and histologic findings. Significant differences (P < .05) included the fact that TEE disclosed more vegetations not prolapsing in the subvalvular region and in absence of valvular regurgitation. At TEE vegetations presented motion distinct from the endocardial surface, irregular conformation, and uneven margins. Only chaotic motion was significantly associated with vegetations at PE; size < 0.5 cm and increased echogenicity characterized pseudovegetations at PE. Other features such as shaggy echoes or location out of the annular zone (previously indicated as typical of vegetations) were not significantly associated with infective lesions. Discriminant analysis of TEE characteristics of vegetations disclosed that chaotic motion was the variable most significantly (P = .008) associated with vegetation. Coexistence of this sign with size < 0.5 cm and uneven margins was associated with 93.3% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity. In conclusion, the echocardiographic aspect of vegetations is rather different when examined from the precordial and the transesophageal approach. Learning about pitfalls and normal variants should improve TEE specificity in the assessment of infective lesions.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声心动图在感染性心内膜炎中的诊断:从心前和经食管入路评价植被的诊断标准的重新评估。
在经食管超声心动图(TEE)中,原心前超声心动图(PE)所使用的植被超声心动图特征不变,但具有不同的图像清晰度和结构分辨率。对52例经PE和TEE诊断为疑似心内膜炎的患者(男36例,女16例;平均年龄62 +/- 18岁;42例确诊心内膜炎)。PE和TEE的结果与大体解剖和组织学结果相对照。显著差异(P < 0.05)包括TEE在瓣下区域显示更多非脱垂的植被和没有瓣反流。TEE时,植被表现为不同于心内膜表面的运动,形态不规则,边缘不均匀。只有混沌运动与PE的植被显著相关;大小< 0.5 cm,回声增强,PE处为假植被。其他特征,如粗糙的回声或位于环形区之外(以前被认为是典型的植被),与感染性病变没有显著相关性。植被TEE特征判别分析表明,混沌运动是与植被相关最显著的变量(P = 0.008)。该征同时存在< 0.5 cm及边缘不均匀,敏感性93.3%,特异性83.7%。总之,超声心动图方面的植被是相当不同的检查时,从心前和经食管入路。了解缺陷和正常变异可以提高TEE在感染性病变评估中的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability of a three-layered appearance in intravascular ultrasound coronary images: a comparison of morphometric measurements with four intravascular ultrasound systems. Contrast-enhanced radiographic computed tomographic findings in patients with straight back syndrome. Comparison of 10, 20, and 40 level electron beam computed tomography studies for coronary calcium. Variation of heart rate and electrocardiograph trigger interval during ultrafast computed tomography. Evaluation of reference systems for quantitative wall motion analysis from three-dimensional endocardial surface reconstruction: an echocardiographic study in subjects with and without myocardial infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1