[Treatment of acute peptic gastroduodenal ulcer: omeprazole is superior to ranitidine especially in the early phase of ulcer healing. A prospective controlled randomized serial endoscopy study].

Leber, Magen, Darm Pub Date : 1995-07-01
J Hotz, W Kark, K Plein, F Wiedbrauck, A Guthke, O Otten
{"title":"[Treatment of acute peptic gastroduodenal ulcer: omeprazole is superior to ranitidine especially in the early phase of ulcer healing. A prospective controlled randomized serial endoscopy study].","authors":"J Hotz,&nbsp;W Kark,&nbsp;K Plein,&nbsp;F Wiedbrauck,&nbsp;A Guthke,&nbsp;O Otten","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Omeprazole (OM) has been shown to be superior to H2-Blockers in terms of complete healing rates of gastric (GU) and duodenal ulcers (DU). We investigated in more detail the kinetics of ulcer healing under OM (20 mg mane) compared with ranitidine (RAN 300 mg nocte) in GU (n = 28) and DU (n = 27) by multiple series endoscopy. After endoscopic diagnosis (day 0) patients were allocated to either OM or RAN in a random order. Endoscopic controls were undertaken at day (d) 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 up to complete ulcer healing. The seize of ulcer areas was assessed by independent endocopists estimating the longest and shortest diameter D acc. to the formula A = pi x D1 x D2:4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In GU and DU cumulating healing rates were sign, higher under OM. In GU and DU, the most striking differences in the absolute and percentual reduction of ulcer seize in favour of OM vs RAN were observed mainly during the first week. At d3 under OM the reduction in DU-area was 43% and at d7 75% compared to a distinctly lower rate under RAN with the corresponding figures of 9% and 61% resp. In GU the mean reduction in area was for IM at d3 41%, at d7 82% in contrast to RAN at d3 of 34% and d7 of 49%. The faster healing during the first week was accompanied by sign more rapid reduction in day-and-night-painscore during OM vs RAN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":17969,"journal":{"name":"Leber, Magen, Darm","volume":"25 4","pages":"165-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leber, Magen, Darm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Omeprazole (OM) has been shown to be superior to H2-Blockers in terms of complete healing rates of gastric (GU) and duodenal ulcers (DU). We investigated in more detail the kinetics of ulcer healing under OM (20 mg mane) compared with ranitidine (RAN 300 mg nocte) in GU (n = 28) and DU (n = 27) by multiple series endoscopy. After endoscopic diagnosis (day 0) patients were allocated to either OM or RAN in a random order. Endoscopic controls were undertaken at day (d) 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 up to complete ulcer healing. The seize of ulcer areas was assessed by independent endocopists estimating the longest and shortest diameter D acc. to the formula A = pi x D1 x D2:4.

Results: In GU and DU cumulating healing rates were sign, higher under OM. In GU and DU, the most striking differences in the absolute and percentual reduction of ulcer seize in favour of OM vs RAN were observed mainly during the first week. At d3 under OM the reduction in DU-area was 43% and at d7 75% compared to a distinctly lower rate under RAN with the corresponding figures of 9% and 61% resp. In GU the mean reduction in area was for IM at d3 41%, at d7 82% in contrast to RAN at d3 of 34% and d7 of 49%. The faster healing during the first week was accompanied by sign more rapid reduction in day-and-night-painscore during OM vs RAN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性消化性胃十二指肠溃疡的治疗:奥美拉唑优于雷尼替丁,特别是在溃疡愈合的早期。一项前瞻性对照随机系列内窥镜研究]。
未标记:在胃(GU)和十二指肠溃疡(DU)的完全愈合率方面,奥美拉唑(OM)已被证明优于h2受体阻滞剂。我们通过多系列内窥镜更详细地研究了OM (20 mg)与雷尼替丁(300 mg)在GU (n = 28)和DU (n = 27)中溃疡愈合的动力学。内镜诊断后(第0天),患者被随机分配到OM或RAN组。在第3、7、14、21、28、42天进行内镜控制,直至溃疡完全愈合。由独立内窥镜医师评估溃疡面积的大小,估计最长和最短的直径。得到公式A = x D1 x D2:4。结果:GU组和DU组的累积愈合率均显著高于OM组。在GU和DU中,OM和RAN在绝对和百分比减少溃疡发作方面的最显著差异主要在第一周观察到。在d3时,在OM下,du面积减少43%,在d7时减少75%,而在RAN下,相应的数字为9%和61%,明显较低。在GU中,IM的平均面积减少为d3的41%,d7的82%,而RAN的平均面积减少为d3的34%和d7的49%。与RAN相比,第一周的更快的愈合伴随着更快速的白天和夜间疼痛评分的减少。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Diagnosis and therapy of portal hypertension]. [Diagnosis and therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection. Guidelines of the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases. Working Group of the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases]. [Positive effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver enzymes in autoimmune hepatitis with little activity--a pilot study]. [Aortoduodenal fistula as the cause of gastrointestinal hemorrhage]. [Pseudo-esophagitis in antacid abuse].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1