[Study of 2 food poisoning outbreaks in Mora (Toledo) with the same source of infection].

Revista de sanidad e higiene publica Pub Date : 1994-09-01
K Fernández de la Hoz Zeitler, J L Carpintero Redondo, J Puchades Belenguer, C Verde López, C García Colmenero
{"title":"[Study of 2 food poisoning outbreaks in Mora (Toledo) with the same source of infection].","authors":"K Fernández de la Hoz Zeitler,&nbsp;J L Carpintero Redondo,&nbsp;J Puchades Belenguer,&nbsp;C Verde López,&nbsp;C García Colmenero","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The occurrence of an outbreak needs an immediate investigation, because on it depends the necessary measures to control the spread of the epidemic, and it is also the way of knowing the causal factor. We present the results of the investigation of two food poisoning outbreaks (outbreak A and outbreak B) occurred in Mora (Toledo). Both outbreaks were reported at the same time, the source of infection was the same and the total number of exposed people was 620.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study was carried out. A standardised questionnaire for food poisoning outbreaks was used to collect the data. Data were analysed using classic methods and also logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 236 individuals were interviewed (119 for outbreak A and 117 for outbreak B), 146 of them were cases (73 in each outbreak). The mean incubation period was of 26.18 (+/- 12.35) and 25.2 (+/- 19.9) hours respectively. The main symptoms were diarrhoea, fever and abdominal pain. The mean age of the cases was 43.42 (+/- 17.03) years old for outbreak A and 42.4 (+/- 19.9) for outbreak B. The statistical analysis showed a significant association between the intake of cake and the disease (adjusted odds ratio = 25.00; 95% confidence interval = 6,4996.15 for outbreak A and adjusted odds ratio = 64.62; 95% confidence interval = 8.10-515.3 for outbreak B). We also obtained a laboratory confirmation showing the presence of Salmonella Entérica I, Infantis 6.7:r:1.5 in samples of cases, cake and samples of the person who prepared the cake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The logistic regression model, used for the analysis was useful to detect and summarise data in a more efficient manner than simple stratified analysis. The collaboration of the Primary Health Care professionals contributed to the success of the investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76450,"journal":{"name":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","volume":"68 5-6","pages":"589-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The occurrence of an outbreak needs an immediate investigation, because on it depends the necessary measures to control the spread of the epidemic, and it is also the way of knowing the causal factor. We present the results of the investigation of two food poisoning outbreaks (outbreak A and outbreak B) occurred in Mora (Toledo). Both outbreaks were reported at the same time, the source of infection was the same and the total number of exposed people was 620.

Methods: A case-control study was carried out. A standardised questionnaire for food poisoning outbreaks was used to collect the data. Data were analysed using classic methods and also logistic regression models.

Results: A total of 236 individuals were interviewed (119 for outbreak A and 117 for outbreak B), 146 of them were cases (73 in each outbreak). The mean incubation period was of 26.18 (+/- 12.35) and 25.2 (+/- 19.9) hours respectively. The main symptoms were diarrhoea, fever and abdominal pain. The mean age of the cases was 43.42 (+/- 17.03) years old for outbreak A and 42.4 (+/- 19.9) for outbreak B. The statistical analysis showed a significant association between the intake of cake and the disease (adjusted odds ratio = 25.00; 95% confidence interval = 6,4996.15 for outbreak A and adjusted odds ratio = 64.62; 95% confidence interval = 8.10-515.3 for outbreak B). We also obtained a laboratory confirmation showing the presence of Salmonella Entérica I, Infantis 6.7:r:1.5 in samples of cases, cake and samples of the person who prepared the cake.

Conclusions: The logistic regression model, used for the analysis was useful to detect and summarise data in a more efficient manner than simple stratified analysis. The collaboration of the Primary Health Care professionals contributed to the success of the investigation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[莫拉(托莱多)两起感染源相同的食物中毒事件研究]。
背景:疫情的发生需要立即进行调查,因为这取决于控制疫情传播的必要措施,也是了解病因的途径。我们报告了发生在托莱多莫拉市的两起食物中毒事件(A和B)的调查结果。这两次暴发是同时报告的,感染源相同,接触者总数为620人。方法:采用病例-对照研究。采用标准化的食物中毒暴发问卷收集数据。数据分析采用经典方法和逻辑回归模型。结果:共访谈236人(A疫情119人,B疫情117人),其中病例146人(各疫情73人)。平均潜伏期分别为26.18(+/- 12.35)和25.2(+/- 19.9)小时。主要症状为腹泻、发热、腹痛。暴发A的平均年龄为43.42(+/- 17.03)岁,暴发b的平均年龄为42.4(+/- 19.9)岁。统计分析显示,蛋糕摄入量与疾病之间存在显著相关性(校正优势比= 25.00;爆发A的95%置信区间= 6,4996.15,校正优势比= 64.62;95%置信区间= 8.10-515.3(爆发B))。我们还获得实验室确认,在病例样本、蛋糕样本和制作蛋糕的人的样本中存在大肠杆菌I,婴儿6.7:r:1.5。结论:用于分析的逻辑回归模型比简单的分层分析更有效地检测和总结数据。初级保健专业人员的合作促进了调查的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Childhood accidents in primary health care]. [Rational structures in health education models: basics and systematization]. [Comparison of deaths in the case register of AIDS and deaths of AIDS in mortality register: Barcelona 1991-1992]. [Analysis of the efficiency of the screening of anti-HVA IgG antibodies before active or passive immunization]. [A critical analysis of the new Spanish regulation on immunological medications].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1