Rodent carcinogenicity and toxicity, in vitro mutagenicity, and their physical chemical determinants

Romualdo Benigni, Cristina Andreoli
{"title":"Rodent carcinogenicity and toxicity, in vitro mutagenicity, and their physical chemical determinants","authors":"Romualdo Benigni,&nbsp;Cristina Andreoli","doi":"10.1016/0165-1110(93)90020-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we considered rodent carcinogenicity and toxicity, and four in vitro mutagenicity systems, and we made a global comparison between their different response profiles to a common set of 297 chemicals. This analysis is complemented with a study of the physical chemical properties of active and inactive compounds in the different systems.</p><p>A clearcut separation between the different classes of toxicological end-points (carcinogenicity, in vivo toxicity, in vitro carcinogenicity) was evident. The observed lack of association between carcinogenicity and toxicity supports the validity of the rodent bioassays; this is contrary to the position that the positive results obtained are due mainly to the use of excessive doses that exert cytotoxic effects. We found substantial consistency in the responses of the in vivo toxicity systems (maximum tolerated dose and LD<sub>50</sub>), but we also found that remarkable differences exist between the in vitro mutagenicity assay systems. The study of the structure-activity relationships showed that: (a) the hydrophobic-electronic properties of the chemicals influence rodent carcinogenicity, with the tendency of carcinogens to be more electrophilic and more hydrophobic than non-carcinogens; (b) steric effects are implied in in vitro mutagenicity, bulkier molecules being less mutagenic than smaller molecules; (c) no clear association between in vivo toxicity and physical chemical properties was apparent. The differences between carcinogenicity and in vitro mutagenicity may hypothetically be related to their different experimental procedures. The relatively short treatment of in vitro mutagenicity requires that chemicals penetrate easily into the cells, and are well dissolved into the aqueous medium, size and hydrophilicity thus being critical for the action of the chemicals. The size of the molecules is not critical in the long-term rodent carcinogenicity experiments, where other factors, like bioaccumulation (hydrophobicity) and electronic reactivity, become essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100940,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-1110(93)90020-N","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016511109390020N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this paper, we considered rodent carcinogenicity and toxicity, and four in vitro mutagenicity systems, and we made a global comparison between their different response profiles to a common set of 297 chemicals. This analysis is complemented with a study of the physical chemical properties of active and inactive compounds in the different systems.

A clearcut separation between the different classes of toxicological end-points (carcinogenicity, in vivo toxicity, in vitro carcinogenicity) was evident. The observed lack of association between carcinogenicity and toxicity supports the validity of the rodent bioassays; this is contrary to the position that the positive results obtained are due mainly to the use of excessive doses that exert cytotoxic effects. We found substantial consistency in the responses of the in vivo toxicity systems (maximum tolerated dose and LD50), but we also found that remarkable differences exist between the in vitro mutagenicity assay systems. The study of the structure-activity relationships showed that: (a) the hydrophobic-electronic properties of the chemicals influence rodent carcinogenicity, with the tendency of carcinogens to be more electrophilic and more hydrophobic than non-carcinogens; (b) steric effects are implied in in vitro mutagenicity, bulkier molecules being less mutagenic than smaller molecules; (c) no clear association between in vivo toxicity and physical chemical properties was apparent. The differences between carcinogenicity and in vitro mutagenicity may hypothetically be related to their different experimental procedures. The relatively short treatment of in vitro mutagenicity requires that chemicals penetrate easily into the cells, and are well dissolved into the aqueous medium, size and hydrophilicity thus being critical for the action of the chemicals. The size of the molecules is not critical in the long-term rodent carcinogenicity experiments, where other factors, like bioaccumulation (hydrophobicity) and electronic reactivity, become essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
啮齿动物致癌性和毒性,体外诱变性及其物理化学决定因素
在本文中,我们考虑了啮齿动物的致癌性和毒性,以及四种体外诱变系统,并对它们对一组常见的297种化学物质的不同反应进行了全球比较。这一分析补充了不同体系中活性和非活性化合物的物理化学性质的研究。不同种类的毒理学终点(致癌性、体内毒性、体外致癌性)之间明显存在明显的区别。观察到致癌性和毒性之间没有联系,这支持了啮齿动物生物测定的有效性;这与认为所获得的阳性结果主要是由于使用过量剂量而产生细胞毒性作用的观点相反。我们发现体内毒性系统(最大耐受剂量和LD50)的反应基本一致,但我们也发现体外诱变试验系统之间存在显着差异。构效关系研究表明:(a)化学物质的疏水电子特性影响啮齿动物致癌性,致癌物比非致癌物更亲电、更疏水;(b)空间效应隐含在体外致突变性中,体积较大的分子比小分子的致突变性小;(c)体内毒性与物理化学性质之间没有明显的关联。致癌性和体外诱变性之间的差异可能与它们不同的实验程序有关。相对较短的体外诱变治疗要求化学物质很容易渗透到细胞中,并很好地溶解在水介质中,因此大小和亲水性对化学物质的作用至关重要。在长期的啮齿动物致癌性实验中,分子的大小并不重要,其他因素,如生物蓄积(疏水性)和电子反应性,才是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DNA adducts and chronic degenerative diseases. Pathogenetic relevance and implications in preventive medicine Carbon tetrachloride: Genetic effects and other modes of action Dr. Hans F. Stich, Professor Emeritus of the University of British Columbia, 1927–1995 Product review Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1