[Preliminary results of the 2nd multicenter study. Thrombocytapheresis with the Fresenius AS-104 blood cell separator and ring study of cell counting. Section of Therapeutic and Preparative Hemapheresis of the DGTI].

N Müller, V Kretschmer, H J Neumann, T Weisswange
{"title":"[Preliminary results of the 2nd multicenter study. Thrombocytapheresis with the Fresenius AS-104 blood cell separator and ring study of cell counting. Section of Therapeutic and Preparative Hemapheresis of the DGTI].","authors":"N Müller,&nbsp;V Kretschmer,&nbsp;H J Neumann,&nbsp;T Weisswange","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Only multicenter studies on cell separators give valid data to compare different cell separators. The aim of the 2nd multicenter study was to evaluate the separation protocol, software version V 4.61, of the Fresenius AS-104 cell separator for efficiency and deviation from predicted yields. Plateletpheresis data from twelve hemapheresis centers, using identical apheresis protocols and cell counting methods, were registered and statistically analyzed. Additionally, the counting methods of the centers were controlled by a ring study with biweekly external cell count trials. To get a comparison, the apheresis data, which depend on the center effects, were corrected by the values from the ring study. Preliminary results of 380 runs are 45.2 +/- 8.1% for the separation effectivity, 1.95% deviation from the predicted yield, whereby 90% of all runs deviated less than 20% from the predicted yield. 50% of products had a WBC contamination below 6 x 10(6).</p>","PeriodicalId":77034,"journal":{"name":"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie = Contributions to infusion therapy","volume":"31 ","pages":"92-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beitrage zur Infusionstherapie = Contributions to infusion therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Only multicenter studies on cell separators give valid data to compare different cell separators. The aim of the 2nd multicenter study was to evaluate the separation protocol, software version V 4.61, of the Fresenius AS-104 cell separator for efficiency and deviation from predicted yields. Plateletpheresis data from twelve hemapheresis centers, using identical apheresis protocols and cell counting methods, were registered and statistically analyzed. Additionally, the counting methods of the centers were controlled by a ring study with biweekly external cell count trials. To get a comparison, the apheresis data, which depend on the center effects, were corrected by the values from the ring study. Preliminary results of 380 runs are 45.2 +/- 8.1% for the separation effectivity, 1.95% deviation from the predicted yield, whereby 90% of all runs deviated less than 20% from the predicted yield. 50% of products had a WBC contamination below 6 x 10(6).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[第二次多中心研究的初步结果]使用费森尤斯AS-104血细胞分离器进行血小板穿刺和细胞计数环研究。DGTI的治疗性和制备性采血部分]。
只有对细胞分离剂的多中心研究才能提供有效的数据来比较不同的细胞分离剂。第二项多中心研究的目的是评估Fresenius AS-104细胞分离器的分离方案(软件版本v4.61)的效率和与预测产率的偏差。12个采血中心的采血小板数据,采用相同的采血方案和细胞计数方法,进行登记和统计分析。此外,中心的计数方法由两周外细胞计数试验的环形研究控制。为了进行比较,用环研究的值对依赖于中心效应的离心数据进行了校正。380次运行的初步结果表明,分离效率为45.2±8.1%,与预测产率偏差为1.95%,其中90%的运行与预测产率偏差小于20%。50%的产品白细胞污染低于6 × 10(6)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Magnesium Infusion Therapy Opioid Infusion Therapy Dexmedetomidine Infusion Therapy Clonidine Infusion Therapy Lidocaine Infusion Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1