[Evaluation and improvement of quality during practical training in primary health care at health centers of Murcia].

Revista de sanidad e higiene publica Pub Date : 1994-03-01
J F Menárguez Puche, P J Saturno Hernández, D Gómez-Calcerrada Berrocal, J A Sánchez Sánchez, J Saura Llamas
{"title":"[Evaluation and improvement of quality during practical training in primary health care at health centers of Murcia].","authors":"J F Menárguez Puche,&nbsp;P J Saturno Hernández,&nbsp;D Gómez-Calcerrada Berrocal,&nbsp;J A Sánchez Sánchez,&nbsp;J Saura Llamas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe the Public Health in Primary Health Care practice for medical students Program objectives, quality of training evaluation method, and implementation results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>6 learning objectives were designed and training implemented in 3 Health Centers in the 90-91 academic course. Evaluation included the objectives level of difficulty, and homogeneity in achievement rates between objectives, within Centres and between Centres. Evaluation results were analyzed and used to design changes to increase homogeneity and achievement rates. Same evaluation was performed in the 91-92 academic course to document improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first evaluation there were highly significant differences in overall (p. < 0.00005) and by objectives (p. > 0.01) achievement rates between centers. Within centres between objectives difficulty was not homogeneous either (p. > 0.001). After implementing remedial actions, differences in difficulty and achievement rates within and between centres decreased. Increased homogeneity affected mostly to two previously less homogeneous objectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quality assurance methods can be successfully applied to improve training of clearly defined and quantified Primary Health Care learning objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":76450,"journal":{"name":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","volume":"68 2","pages":"279-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To describe the Public Health in Primary Health Care practice for medical students Program objectives, quality of training evaluation method, and implementation results.

Methods: 6 learning objectives were designed and training implemented in 3 Health Centers in the 90-91 academic course. Evaluation included the objectives level of difficulty, and homogeneity in achievement rates between objectives, within Centres and between Centres. Evaluation results were analyzed and used to design changes to increase homogeneity and achievement rates. Same evaluation was performed in the 91-92 academic course to document improvement.

Results: In the first evaluation there were highly significant differences in overall (p. < 0.00005) and by objectives (p. > 0.01) achievement rates between centers. Within centres between objectives difficulty was not homogeneous either (p. > 0.001). After implementing remedial actions, differences in difficulty and achievement rates within and between centres decreased. Increased homogeneity affected mostly to two previously less homogeneous objectives.

Conclusions: Quality assurance methods can be successfully applied to improve training of clearly defined and quantified Primary Health Care learning objectives.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[穆尔西亚保健中心初级保健实践培训质量的评价和改进]。
背景:描述公共卫生在初级卫生保健实习医学生项目的目标、培训质量评价方法和实施效果。方法:设计6个学习目标,在3个卫生院实施90-91学年度课程培训。评价包括目标的难度程度,以及目标之间、中心内部和中心之间的成功率的同质性。对评价结果进行分析并用于设计变更以提高均一性和成品率。在91-92年的学术课程中进行了同样的评估,以记录改善。结果:在第一次评估中,各中心在总体完成率(p < 0.00005)和目标完成率(p > 0.01)上有极显著差异。在目标之间的中心,难度也不均匀(p > 0.001)。在实施补救行动后,中心内部和中心之间的难度和成就差异减小了。同质性的增加主要影响到两个以前不太同质的目标。结论:质量保证方法可以成功地应用于明确定义和量化的初级卫生保健学习目标的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Childhood accidents in primary health care]. [Rational structures in health education models: basics and systematization]. [Comparison of deaths in the case register of AIDS and deaths of AIDS in mortality register: Barcelona 1991-1992]. [Analysis of the efficiency of the screening of anti-HVA IgG antibodies before active or passive immunization]. [A critical analysis of the new Spanish regulation on immunological medications].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1